Is Sugar the Most Toxic Substance in Our Diet?
ASPEN, Colo. — Dr. Robert Lustig, the physician and YouTube sensation who once wrote that sugar should be regulated like alcohol, is on a new crusade to kill the sweetener.
In a packed, standing-room-only discussion at the Aspen Ideas Festival Friday, Lustig called sugar an addictive substance that has no place in consumers' diets. He also hinted that he's ready to step up his fight to push for legislation to cut sugar consumption.
"We have to do something about our diets," he said. "We have to get control."
Lustig recently completed his law degree at the University of California's Hastings College of the Law, and says he plans to "coerce" Washington policy makers to take a tougher stance on sugar. He did not provide specifics about such a plan, but said his appearance at the influential ideas conference was the first step in his effort to raise awareness about the issue.
Lustig's basic argument is simple: Calories are not created equal. He posits that the calories from a can of sugary soda are not the same as those that come from eating a bag of almonds. That's because "sugar calories" affect the body differently, he says.
The brain is biologically programmed to become dependent on sugar, Lustig says, wanting more and more of it over time. That excess sugar can lead to diabetes, obesity, heart disease and a host of other illnesses.
Not all physicians agree with this thinking, of course; some say a calorie burned is a calorie burned. But few critics have a platform like Lustig's. He is omnipresent in the media, making frequent appearances on radio programs and TV shows. His 90-minute anti-sugar lecture, "Sugar: The Bitter Truth," has been viewed more than three million times on YouTube.
And he's working on a cookbook, due out next year, that follows the publication of his bestseller, "Fat Chance," released in late 2012.
On Friday, he aimed much of his scorn at food manufacturers, which he says have "hijacked our taste buds" and contributed to a tripling in American sugar consumption over the past 30 years.
"They knew when they added more sugar, we bought more of their products because of the addiction phenomenon," he said. "What if you had an unscrupulous cereal manufacturer who laced your Cheerios with morphine? Would that be OK? This is the legal equivalent."
The average adult ingests 22 teaspoons of sugar a day, according to the American Heart Association. The organization recommends that be cut to just six teaspoons for women and nine for men.
Solving the problem gets tricky, though. Consumers need to do their part to eat more healthy "real foods" and less pre-packaged items. But Lustig acknowledges that may not be possible for people with low budgets or limited access to more nutritious food.
Government efforts to limit substances have also had mixed results. A 2010 recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration to reduce the amount of salt in processed foods has largely been ignored by food manufacturers. The Center for Science in the Public Interest reported earlier this month that sodium levels in many foods remain higher today than in 2005.
Then there's the issue of taste: Consumers crave sweets. Lustig's own wife is an avid baker, yet she's managed to cut sugar by a third in all of her recipes. Lustig says pastries are better that way — it's easier to distinguish the oats, raisins and other ingredients.
In the past, Lustig has advocated for taxes and age limits to prevent people from buying sugary products. He said Friday he considered regulation "a last resort," but "unfortunately, we're at that last resort."
"Medicare will be broke by 2026 if we do nothing," he said. "You know what? I want my freaking Medicare."
Nutrition experts are quick to point out that Lustig's singular focus on sugar can be problematic. Yes, sugar is worrisome in large quantities, but so is excess sodium, meat or dietary fats, said Dr. David Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center. He cautions against thinking that sugar is the only problem that needs to be addressed.
"The reality of course is that sugar is not ‘the’ thing wrong with our diet, it is just ‘a’ thing wrong with our diet," Dr. Katz says.
Still, in Aspen, the audience embraced much of Lustig's message. During a rapid-fire question-and-answer session, so many hands went up that the interviewer, The Atlantic's Corby Kummer, had to take questions in batches.
Among them: How do you detox from sugar? (Exercise to work it out.) Are artificial sweeteners like Equal safe? (It's unclear.) Is juicing a good idea? (It's fine for vegetables, but not recommended for fruits, because juicing removes fiber, making it easier for the body to absorb fructose, the main sugar in fruit.)
Lustig's final piece of advice? When shopping for pre-packaged foods, never buy anything labeled "light" or fat free.
"That is truly poison," he said.
Read more coverage of the Aspen Ideas Festival:
- Don Peppers: Coming Soon -- A Car That Lives in the 'Cloud'
- Mark Mobius: What the Stock Market Is Telling Us About the Economy
- Chip Cutter: A Harvard Economist's Surprisingly Simple Productivity Secret
- Heather Hiles: Will a Common Curriculum Change Our Schools?
- Charles Best: How Crowdfunding Could Save the Arts
- Chester Elton: The Stealth Ways to Network at Conferences
Copyright ? 2013 LinkedIn Corp. All Rights Reserved
Owner and Principal Massage Therapist at Mindful-Massage
10 年FRUCTOSE and High Fructose Corn Syrup are worse than SUGAR since Fructose IS a slow, chronic poison, attached to Galactose in Sucrose (Table Sugar). Fructose is the poison in Table Sugar. It is only metabolized by the liver like all poisons. It turns on all the fat production pathways. It creates the very dense type of LDL that invades the endothelial linings of coronary arteries. It is not converted to glycogen. It laces all food products as a political choice for its cheap price. But I think FLUORIDE is the worse toxin because it lowers our pH and our Voltage so we're all HYPOTHYROID and now cannot regerate new cells everywhere, which istthe true cause of ALL Chronic Diseases.
Collage Artist/Illustrator, Blogger, Author
11 年It may be hard to swallow but once upon a time sugar was not the unhealthy villain it is viewed today but an "essential" nutrient. Through the first half of the 20th century sugar was deemed essential to health-good tasting and good for you. In fact it was sanctioned by Uncle Sam as part of the 7 essential food groups of WWII. No one fanned the sugar flame more than Corn Products Refining Co. producers of dextrose sugar whose ads encouraged "By all means. let em' eat cake...and candy too! Dextrose was the wonder nutrient. For a look at a collection of vintage Dextrose ads whose messages seem as quaint as the images themselves https://envisioningtheamericandream.com/2013/03/11/stay-as-sweet-as-you-are/
Freelance Dietitian
11 年Find this a fascinating subject hence my dissertation on the subject
Communications. Strategy. Storytelling.
11 年Love the Cheerios-morphine comparison. Totally never thought about sugar like that.
WOODRUFF HIGGINS & COMPANY
11 年This is Divine Truth and when "Sugar" is banned there will not be a need for a Health System as there will be 99,9 % Dis-Ease, Tradional Natural Medicine will Prevail, when the Truth come's out and is the Accepted Norm of Civilization, It Need to stop at the Money and Needs to go to the Caring of Each Human on this Globe. Period Eric G Hof Toronto Canada Believer in the "Old Ways" and Truths,, NOT GREED, and Domination of the Masses ...July 5.2013