Jurimatic - Verdicts and Settlements的封面图片
Jurimatic - Verdicts and Settlements

Jurimatic - Verdicts and Settlements

信息服务

New York City,New York 554 位关注者

Reporting jury verdicts and settlements in personal injury and medical malpractice cases.

关于我们

A jury verdict and settlements reporting platform.

网站
https://jurimatic.com
所属行业
信息服务
规模
51-200 人
总部
New York City,New York
类型
私人持股
创立
2023
领域
Jury Verdicts、Legal Publishing、Medical Malpractice、Personal Injury、Products Liability、Premises Liability、Slip and Fall和Nursing Home Negligence

动态

  • Premises Liability Lawsuit: Save Smart Found Liable for $8M While Chasing Shoplifter On August 7, 2020, Ida Galo filed a premises liability lawsuit in the Essex County Superior Court after a shoplifter fleeing from Save Smart in Newark collided with her. Galo was knocked to the ground, causing a head injury, including a subdural hematoma and mild traumatic brain injury. She sued Save Smart, its manager Daljit Singh, and the property owner, Ironbound Plaza Urban Renewal, claiming negligence and premises liability for failing to ensure pedestrian safety and proper employee training. Galo suffered significant physical, cognitive, and emotional distress from the injuries, leading to substantial medical expenses. The defense argued that her preexisting strokes, not the incident, contributed to her condition and that the employees acted reasonably. On January 27, 2025, the jury found Save Smart liable for negligence and awarded Galo $8 million in damages, rejecting the defense's arguments about her preexisting conditions. Winning Counsel: Barry Eichen | Dean Maglione Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #PremisesLiability #PersonalInjury #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Defense Jury Verdict in Civil Rights Lawsuit: Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Cleared Against Nissan On October 13, 2023, OnSite Fleet, LLC filed a civil rights lawsuit against Nissan North America, alleging discrimination and retaliation against its employees. The lawsuit stemmed from Nissan's actions in 2021, when it revoked access to several OnSite employees—McGlory, Mullins, Battle, and Edmondson—based on unfounded complaints and later terminated the Corporate Vehicle Lease Program (CV Program), resulting in the employees' layoffs. OnSite claimed Nissan's actions were racially motivated and retaliatory, causing significant financial damages and loss of business. The lawsuit included claims of discrimination under Section 1981, breach of contract, and tortious interference with employment relationships. Nissan denied the allegations, asserting that its decisions were based on legitimate business reasons and not racial discrimination. It argued that OnSite had breached the Professional Services Agreement and raised several defenses, including a counterclaim for damages due to OnSite’s alleged contract violations. After a trial, on January 22, 2025, the jury ruled in favor of Nissan, finding no evidence of unlawful retaliation or breach of contract by the company. OnSite failed to prove that Nissan’s actions caused harm, and Nissan also did not prove that OnSite’s actions harmed the company. Winning Counsel: Brigid M.Carpenter | Nelson Suarez | Charles K. Grant Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #WorkplaceDiscrimination #RacialDiscrimination #Nissan? #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Police Shooting of Schizophrenic Man Results in $50,000 Settlement in Oklahoma On January 12, 2013, Jeannie McClaine filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Officer Daniel Lopez and the City of Oklahoma City following the fatal shooting of her son, Daniel Hobbs, on May 11, 2021. Hobbs, a 34-year-old man with schizophrenia, was visiting his grandparents when Lopez responded to a disturbance call. The situation escalated when Lopez, attempting to handcuff Hobbs, was involved in a physical struggle with him. During the altercation, Lopez’s body camera footage turned off, and police later claimed that Hobbs gained control of Lopez's Taser. A neighbor filmed the moment Lopez shot Hobbs while they were on the ground, and Hobbs later died in the hospital. In the lawsuit, McClaine accused Lopez of using excessive force and escalating the situation without justification, emphasizing Hobbs' mental health struggles. The City of Oklahoma City denied the allegations, asserting that Lopez acted within the law, and argued that McClaine had not properly complied with legal requirements. After legal proceedings, the case was settled on February 2, 2025, with the City agreeing to pay McClaine $50,000, resolving her claims of excessive force in the fatal shooting. Winning Counsel: Jeffrey Box Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #Schizophrenia #WrongfulDeath #ExcessiveForce #PoliceAccountability #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Miami Homeowner Wins $184,740 After Tow Truck Hit-and-Run Damages House Lorraine Slack-Davidson filed a lawsuit against Vice Towing, Inc. after a hit-and-run incident on April 5, 2024, when a tow truck from the company caused significant damage to her home. The driver was attempting to back the truck into a location at 1330 NW 183rd Street in Miami Gardens, Florida, when the vehicle struck the east corner of her house, causing structural damage. Instead of stopping to provide assistance, the driver fled the scene. However, Slack-Davidson was able to capture the truck’s license plate number, which led to the identification of Vice Towing as the responsible party. Unable to resolve the issue directly, she filed a premises liability lawsuit against the company in Miami-Dade County court. The collision caused an estimated $5,000 in repair costs for the damage to her home, and Slack-Davidson also suffered emotional distress from the suddenness of the crash and the driver’s failure to take responsibility. In the lawsuit, she claimed that Vice Towing was negligent, alleging that the company had failed to train and supervise the driver properly, and that the company’s actions demonstrated a reckless disregard for safety. Vice Towing did not respond to the lawsuit, leading the court to issue a default order on October 8, 2024. This default allowed the case to proceed to trial to determine compensation. At trial, expert witness Benjamin J. Sens, a Certified General Contractor, provided testimony on the damage to the home and the necessary repairs. He explained the reconstruction process and confirmed the repair costs, ensuring that the work would meet local building codes. On February 4, 2025, the jury awarded Slack-Davidson $184,740 in damages, finding Vice Towing fully responsible for the incident due to their failure to take precautions and respond to the legal proceedings. Winning Counsel: Layla Samman, Esq. Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #HitAndRun #PremisesLiability #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Breach of Contract Lawsuit: Flight School Prevails in $91K Training Dispute On August 30, 2023, Donavan Lobello sued Blue Line Aviation for breach of contract in Wake County Superior Court, North Carolina, claiming the school failed to provide the promised flight training. Lobello had enrolled in the school’s Career Pilot Program in June 2022, paying $91,575 for comprehensive flight training. However, he encountered issues soon after beginning his training, including multiple class cancellations, inadequate instruction, and incorrect training hours logged by the school. Despite raising concerns, Lobello withdrew after two weeks of unresolved complaints. He sought compensation for over $25,000 in financial damages, including penalties for breaking his lease and continued loan payments. He also claimed Blue Line Aviation engaged in deceptive trade practices. Blue Line Aviation denied breaching the contract, arguing that class cancellations were due to health and safety precautions, and claimed the contract’s terms were followed. The company further contended that flight instruction was exempt from claims under North Carolina’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. On January 29, 2025, the jury ruled in favor of Blue Line Aviation, determining that the company did not breach its contract with Lobello. Winning Counsel: Matthew C. Burke | Robert C. DeRosset Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #BreachOfContract #FlightTraining? #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem India | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Miami Strip Club Lawsuit Verdict: Tootsie’s Prevails as Jury Rejects Employee Status Claim In a lawsuit filed on September 12, 2023, Jane Doe accused Tootsie’s Cabaret in Miami of workplace discrimination and harassment, claiming she was coerced into unwanted sexual activities and subjected to a hostile work environment. Doe argued that the strip club’s management failed to intervene and address the misconduct, resulting in severe emotional and physical harm, including anxiety, depression, and trauma. She sought compensation for lost wages, emotional distress, medical expenses, and punitive damages. The defense, represented by Tootsie’s Cabaret, contended that Doe was not an employee but an independent contractor, which invalidated her claims. They also argued that the strip club had taken reasonable steps to prevent misconduct and that third parties caused any harm she suffered. On February 3, 2025, the jury sided with Tootsie’s Cabaret, ruling that Doe was not an employee of the club and that there was no negligence on the part of the club that directly caused her injuries. The jury's decision led to the dismissal of the lawsuit. Winning Counsel: Gary Scott Edinger | Avery Larson | BENJAMIN ALLEN LLP Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #WorkplaceSafety #LaborLaw #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Louisiana Jury Awards $18.4M in Damages For Rear-End Collision Robert Marionneaux filed an auto negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision on July 30, 2020, in Baton Rouge. Marionneaux, a law student and law clerk, was rear-ended by Wilson Alexander, a reporter for The Advocate, while both were on the Perkins Road entrance ramp to I-10. Marionneaux suffered severe disc injuries, requiring epidural steroid injections and the recommendation for surgery. He sought damages for his medical bills, totaling $82,347, and additional future medical expenses. Marionneaux initially sued Alexander, who had a $50,000 insurance policy, and pursued underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage from his insurer, Farm Bureau, with a $2.5 million policy limit. Farm Bureau settled partially, paying $500,000, but later argued The Advocate should also be liable, claiming Alexander was acting within the scope of his employment during the incident. Marionneaux amended his lawsuit to include The Advocate. The defense argued that Alexander wasn't working at the time, but the court found him solely at fault. The jury also concluded that Alexander was acting within the scope of his employment, making The Advocate liable. In the January 2025 trial, Marionneaux was awarded a total of $18,422,935, including $82,793 for past medical expenses, $340,141 for future medical care, and $16 million in non-economic damages (pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life). Winning Counsel: Michael Fruge | Tony Clayton | Keondra Riley Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #TheAdvocate #autonegligence #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem India | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Jury Awards Worker $12.1M in Unsafe Construction Premises Liability Lawsuit Luis P. Guayara filed a premises liability lawsuit after falling 18 feet from an unsecured ladder while working at a construction site in Croton-on-Hudson, New York, on March 30, 2017. He suffered severe spinal injuries and required multiple surgeries. Guayara sued the property owners (John P. and Eileen M. Davis) and the construction companies (Honey Do Men, LLC and Honey Do Men Gutters, Inc.), claiming they failed to provide a safe work environment and proper safety equipment, violating New York Labor Laws. The defendants denied liability, with some filing cross-claims against each other for indemnity and breach of contract. In 2025, a Westchester County jury found Honey Do Men Gutters, Inc. fully liable and awarded Guayara $12,170,294.11 in damages, covering past and future pain and suffering, medical expenses, and lost income. Winning Counsel: Daniel G. Ecker Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #PremisesLiability #ConstructionInjury #WorkplaceSafety #LaborLaw #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Underage DUI Tragedy: Jury Clears Co-Defendant in Teen Wrongful Death Case On November 7, 2022, a wrongful death lawsuit was filed by Ami Fid Bissette, on behalf of Johnathan Pooley's estate, after Pooley died in a car crash on November 14, 2021, in Wake County, North Carolina. Pooley was a passenger in a car driven by Katherine Ann Deis, who had been drinking alcohol and lost control of the vehicle, causing it to crash and eject Pooley, who was pronounced dead at the scene. The lawsuit was filed against several Defendants, including Deis, Apex Eagles (the store that sold alcohol to minors), and Deis’s friends who helped obtain the alcohol. The Plaintiff argued that Apex Eagles was negligent for selling alcohol to minors and that Deis's drunk driving directly caused Pooley's death. Civil conspiracy claims were also brought against Deis’s friends for helping illegally obtain alcohol. The Defendants denied liability, claiming Pooley contributed to his death by attending the party and getting into a car with an intoxicated driver. They also raised third-party involvement and procedural issues. The Defendants contested the claim for punitive damages. On February 7, 2025, the jury found that Mary German, one of the Defendants, was not liable for Pooley's death, ruling that her negligence did not directly cause the fatal accident. Winning Counsel:? ?Owen C. Jr. Tierney | Erin Katelyn Taylor Berry | John T. Jeffries | Stephanie Watson Anderson | Keith William Carney | Robert Cratch | Robert G.Lewis | Jesse Andrew Schaefer | Amanda M.Wells Click the link in the comments below to read the full article ?? #WrongfulDeath #DUIAccident #UnderageDrinking #JuryVerdict CC: Exlitem | Expert Witness Profiler [EWP] | Ashish Arun

    • 该图片无替代文字

关联主页

相似主页