Join the AESG on December 10th for an in-person event corresponding to the launch of our 2024 annual policy volume, "Strengthening America’s Economic Dynamism." The morning will feature discussions with economists and policymakers about the most important topics in US economic policy today – including the future of US trade and industrial policy and the growing federal debt. The event will include a panel discussion on post-election economic policies, featuring Jason Furman, Aetna Professor of the Practice of Economic Policy at Harvard University, Michael Strain, Director of Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, and Allison Schrager, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, in conversation with AESG Director Melissa Kearney. Register now:?https://lnkd.in/gKPqEXq6
Aspen Economic Strategy Group
非盈利组织
Washington,DC 511 位关注者
The Aspen Economic Strategy Group promotes evidence-based solutions to significant U.S. economic challenges.
关于我们
The Aspen Economic Strategy Group (AESG), a non-profit program of the Aspen Institute, is composed of a diverse, bipartisan group of distinguished leaders and thinkers with the goal of promoting evidence-based solutions to significant U.S. economic challenges. Co-chaired by former U.S. treasury secretaries Henry M. Paulson, Jr. and Timothy F. Geithner, the AESG fosters the exchange of economic policy ideas and seeks to clarify the lines of debate on emerging economic issues while promoting bipartisan relationship-building among current and future generations of policy leaders in Washington.
- 网站
-
https://www.economicstrategygroup.org/
Aspen Economic Strategy Group的外部链接
- 所属行业
- 非盈利组织
- 规模
- 2-10 人
- 总部
- Washington,DC
动态
-
From David Deming, Christopher Ong, and Lawrence H. Summers' paper in our 2024 annual policy volume. Read it here: https://lnkd.in/ew8z-Y2t
Love this chart from: https://lnkd.in/gTZnfrFv
-
Today, the AESG released a new paper, “The Surprising Resilience of Globalization: An Examination of Claims of Economic Fragmentation,” by Brad Setser. In the paper, Setser evaluates the current landscape of global economic integration. He first observes that — despite growing bipartisan skepticism about the value of liberal trade — globalization is not in retreat. The immediate risk facing the global economy, in Setser's view, is better described as unhealthy integration rather than fragmentation. He then identifies a set of three policy reforms to support healthier forms of global integration. Read the complete paper here: https://lnkd.in/gB_439Wu This paper is part of our 2024 annual policy volume, "Strengthening America's Economic Dynamism," which will be released across the remainder of this year. The volume discusses topics including US trade and industrial policy, fiscal and state capacity, AI and the labor market, and the economics of crime. Read this year’s introduction on our website: https://lnkd.in/gukaKd7f
The Surprising Resilience of Globalization: An Examination of Claims of Economic Fragmentation ? The Aspen Institute Economic Strategy Group
https://www.economicstrategygroup.org
-
Aspen Economic Strategy Group转发了
#MRCBG affiliate Christopher Ong, #MRCBG Director Lawrence H. Summers and Harvard Kennedy School's David Deming discuss how past episodes of tech disruption can shed light on the potential impact of AI on the U.S. labor market in this recent Aspen Economic Strategy Group Paper. Read it here - https://lnkd.in/ew8z-Y2t
Technological Disruption in the US Labor Market ? The Aspen Institute Economic Strategy Group
https://www.economicstrategygroup.org
-
Aspen Economic Strategy Group转发了
Why should the U.S. wish our economic policy to be more like China’s? China’s central planning will not be remembered as a long-term success. The U.S is a global manufacturing powerhouse. And the American Dream is not dead. By me, in National Review. Link: https://lnkd.in/dRWsGEJE Cc: American Enterprise Institute, Aspen Economic Strategy Group, The Aspen Institute.
-
Aspen Economic Strategy Group转发了
The conversation around the U.S. strategic competition with China often seems to assume that the United States is “lagging” China, and that the U.S. must “catch up” to Chinese manufacturing using protectionist measures.?But why should the U.S. wish our economic policy to be more like China’s? China’s central planning will not be remembered as a long-term success. It has led to overinvestment in many sectors, a deeply imbalanced economy with too little consumption spending, a growth model struggling to transition away from exports, massive overbuilding of real estate, and an inadequate safety net. State policies have led to demographic problems that will have enormous economic ramifications.?Moreover, to the limited extent that China’s model is working, it only works because their economy is embedded in an authoritarian state with a compliant industrial sector.?Rather than uniting our allies, the protectionist policies of the Trump and Biden administrations have antagonized allies and called into question whether the U.S. is a reliable partner. Rather than pursuing narrow and clear objectives, the U.S.’s goals are broad, muddled, and in conflict with each other.?A better approach would clearly acknowledge that China is a bad actor while taking a judicious approach, targeting a narrow set of practices, products, and technologies that clearly warrant intervention on economic security grounds, and pursuing that intervention in concert with as broad a coalition of allies as possible. It would not conflate economic security goals with domestic economic considerations, like trends in manufacturing employment. It would involve strengthening — and certainly not continuing to weaken — international institutions like the World Trade Organization.?Finally, it would proceed with confidence in the American system of democratic capitalism.?Check out my new paper, "Protectionism is Failing and Wrongheaded: An Evaluation of the Post-2017 Shift toward Trade Wars and Industrial Policy." Link: https://lnkd.in/ee58BBwQ Cc: American Enterprise Institute, Aspen Economic Strategy Group, The Aspen Institute.
-
How will recent advances in #ArtificialIntelligence (AI) impact the job market? That question is top of mind for just about anyone thinking about the economy right now, and with the current pace of progress, the answer seems to be changing by the day. A new paper released this morning by the AESG takes a step back, putting these developments into historical perspective. In “Technological Disruption in the US Labor Market,” authors David Deming, Christopher Ong, and Lawrence H. Summers assess the potential long-term impact of AI on the labor market by looking at more than 140 years of labor market data. They examine how the structure of jobs across the economy changed after the introduction of “general-purpose technologies” (GPTs), like steam power, electricity, and IT tools. The authors then look for early signs of such disruption from AI in the labor market today. One sign they see: the rapid rise of STEM jobs across the economy. Since 2010, the share of employment in STEM jobs has increased by more than 50%, fueled by growth in software and computer-related occupations. On the other hand, growth in most low-paid service-sector jobs have all but stalled out, falling back recently to levels seen 20 years ago. Read the full paper here: https://lnkd.in/ew8z-Y2t
-
Today, the AESG released a new paper, "Protectionism is Failing and Wrongheaded: An Evaluation of the Post-2017 Shift toward Trade Wars and Industrial Policy," written by Michael Strain. The paper is part of the AESG's 2024 annual policy volume, "Strengthening America's Economic Dynamism", which will be released across the remainder of this year. The paper evaluates the shift towards increasingly protectionist and nationalist policies carried out by the past two presidential administrations. In the paper, Strain argues that the turn to such economic policies has not only been ineffective by its own standards, failing to raise employment and reduce America’s reliance on China, but also is more fundamentally misguided. Strain concludes that, while free trade has been disruptive, populist policies adopted in response will hurt workers, not help them. Instead, he writes that economic policymakers should focus on connecting workers to opportunities created from open trade, rather than enacting protectionist policies and attempting to recreate jobs of the past. Read the complete paper here: https://lnkd.in/gBPT8R7s
Protectionism is Failing and Wrongheaded: An Evaluation of the Post-2017 Shift toward Trade Wars and Industrial Policy ? The Aspen Institute Economic Strategy Group
https://www.economicstrategygroup.org
-
HAPPENING NOW: Stream “Strengthening America’s Economic Dynamism” LIVE from Aspen. Watch here: https://lnkd.in/gf9t_xSt
Strengthening America’s Economic Dynamism
https://www.youtube.com/
-
TODAY 3:30PM ET/1:30PM MT | Tune into the Aspen Economic Strategy Group's event, "Strengthening America's Economic Dynamism," LIVE from Aspen. Americans are facing an era of economic reconfiguration driven by rising global tensions, technological change, and a populist backlash to the economic status quo. Leaders on both sides of the political aisle are increasingly turning away from free-market principles and endorsing protectionist trade policies and government industrial policy. This shift threatens to end an era characterized by international economic cooperation and broad-based global growth. What does this trend mean for America’s economic dynamism? What steps should US policy and business leaders take to advance innovation, growth, and widespread economic prosperity? Featuring AESG Director Melissa S. Kearney, in conversation with Lawrence H. Summers and Robert B. Zoellick. Livestream: https://lnkd.in/g7vzAsuc Event Webpage: https://lnkd.in/gJx_nJU6
Strengthening America's Economic Dynamism ? The Aspen Institute Economic Strategy Group
https://www.economicstrategygroup.org