Zelensky the Clown, Trump the Bully, and Biden the Gaslighter: The Battle Between Power, Perception, and Reality

Some wars are fought with guns. Others are fought with words. And then there is a third kind—the kind that unfolds in front of cameras, where leaders do not just fight battles but craft narratives, where perception is as important as reality, and where power is measured not only in weapons but in attention, leverage, and the ability to dictate the tempo.

The Ukraine war has been all three. It is a brutal, relentless conflict that has devastated a country, drained economies, and reshaped global politics. But it is also a stage, a place where world leaders maneuver for control—not just of territory, but of the story itself.

And in that game, three men stand at the center.

• A president who convinced Ukraine that the West would never abandon it, only to watch the support fade when the tide turned.
• A wartime leader who won the world’s sympathy but mistook applause for strategy.
• A dealmaker who views war not as a cause, but as a transaction, and who refuses to invest in something that does not benefit him.

But there is another piece to this puzzle—one that Western media does not like to talk about.

It is easy to hate Vladimir Putin. It is easy because the West controls the dominant media narrative. It is easy because there is a pre-written script in which he is always the villain, never the strategist, never the leader making decisions based on national security, only the aggressor who acts without reason.

The reality is more complicated.

It is worth asking—if the U.S. felt threatened by a hostile military alliance moving into Mexico or Canada, would it simply stand by?

Of course not. It would act.

Putin had a right to defend his borders. Ukraine’s NATO ambitions were always a red line, something Russia made clear for decades. That red line was ignored. And once the war began, the coverage was one-sided. Every Ukrainian missile strike was called “heroic.” Every Russian attack was labeled “barbaric.”

Does Russia bear responsibility for the war? Yes. But to act as if the West was merely an innocent bystander, as if NATO was not expanding ever closer to Russia’s doorstep, as if Ukraine was not used as a pawn in a geopolitical game much bigger than itself—that is dishonest.

And the same applies to Donald Trump.

It is easy to hate him because mainstream media does. It is easy to dismiss him because every major outlet outside of alternative media paints him as reckless, unhinged, dangerous.

But the media is not neutral. It never was.

Trump is not liked because he does not play by Washington’s rules. He does not speak the language of diplomats, he does not follow the script, and he does not pretend to care about causes that do not benefit him or his country.

Is he ruthless? Yes. Is he blunt? Absolutely. But he is not wrong about everything.

And that is what brings us to his showdown with Zelensky.

Biden: The Gaslighter Who Built Ukraine’s False Sense of Security

Long before Zelensky’s tense meeting with Trump, before Ukraine realized just how fragile its alliances were, there was a promise.

Not an explicit, written-in-stone guarantee, but a promise wrapped in rhetoric, implied in actions, reinforced by every round of aid and every speech about “standing with Ukraine.”

Joe Biden did not just encourage Ukraine to fight. He convinced it that the West would never let it lose.

• He told Ukraine that NATO membership was within reach, even when it was not.
• He sent weapons and aid but never enough to actually secure victory.
• He reassured Ukraine that America would stand “for as long as it takes” but never defined what that actually meant.

And for a time, Ukraine believed it.

But the reality was far more complicated.

• More than 500,000 soldiers on both sides had been killed or wounded, yet Western leaders hesitated to push for negotiations.
• Ukraine still lost 20% of its territory, despite the billions in weapons it had received.
• Aid packages became harder to secure, each one turning into a political battle in Washington and Brussels.

Then, as 2024 came to a close and the U.S. election loomed, the promises softened, the urgency faded, and suddenly, the narrative shifted.

Biden had built an illusion. And when it collapsed, Ukraine was left scrambling.

Zelensky: The Wartime Leader Who Overplayed the Media Game

There is no doubt that Volodymyr Zelensky loves his country. He did not choose this war, but when it arrived, he did something no Ukrainian leader before him had managed—he rallied the world.

He became the symbol of defiance, the leader who would not flee, the man standing in the rubble of Kyiv while missiles rained down, refusing to bow.

And for a time, it worked.

The world listened. The money flowed. The weapons came in.

But war is not won with speeches. Sympathy does not secure battlefields.

And what did Zelensky do as his people suffered?

• He marched through war zones in military garb, ensuring the cameras were rolling.
• He delivered emotional speeches at award shows, making Ukraine’s struggle a Hollywood talking point.
• He demanded billions from the U.S. Congress, speaking as if American taxpayers owed him their wallets.
• He lashed out at world leaders who did not prioritize Ukraine over their own people.

At first, the world responded. But over time, the cracks appeared.

This was the moment to shift gears, to recognize that the world’s patience was running out, to work behind closed doors and secure Ukraine’s future through negotiation.

Instead, Zelensky kept playing for the audience.

And nowhere was that miscalculation clearer than in his meeting with Trump.

Trump: The Bully Who Had No Patience for the Show

Donald Trump does not do diplomacy the way others do.

Where others use carefully measured words, he bluntly states his position. Where others play the long game, he looks for immediate returns. Where others treat war as a global concern, he treats it as a financial burden.

And when Zelensky arrived at the White House on February 28, 2025, expecting a challenge but hoping to turn the moment into another rallying cry, he found himself face to face with a leader who did not care about the optics.

• Trump accused him of being “disrespectful” and of “gambling with World War III.”
• Vice President JD Vance openly questioned why America was still sending billions.
• Zelensky pushed back, hoping public pressure would force Trump’s hand. Instead, Trump cut off a critical minerals deal Ukraine desperately needed.

Zelensky believed that if he took the battle public, he would win support.

But Trump does not play by those rules. He does not respond to pressure. He retaliates against it.

And here is where both men failed.

Zelensky should have never made the meeting about public perception. He should have handled it privately, away from the cameras, negotiating where it actually mattered.

Trump, for all his strategic thinking, should have been more diplomatic in his approach. He should have given Zelensky the space to recalibrate, to understand the new dynamics without humiliation.

Instead, both men left the meeting worse off.

Zelensky, weakened, exposed, without a new commitment. Trump, portrayed as cold, dismissive, indifferent to Ukraine’s struggle.

It was a battle neither needed to have, and both lost in their own way.

What Happens Now?

The war has not been won. The world is moving on. And Ukraine is running out of time.

• The enthusiasm that once defined the international response is fading.
• The once-unlimited aid is now a subject of heated political debate.
• The hard reality of war is catching up to those who thought it could be willed away.

This war should have never reached this point. It should have never become a performance, a battle for media attention rather than a battle for actual survival.

But the past cannot be changed. The only question now is whether Ukraine will recognize the new reality before it is too late.

Because survival is not about speeches. It is about strategy.

• Diplomacy is no longer optional; it is a necessity.
• The time for grandstanding is over.
• The time for quiet, serious negotiations has arrived.

Zelensky must step away from the cameras and step into the rooms where real decisions are made.

Trump must recognize that blunt force diplomacy does not always lead to the best outcomes.

And the world must decide whether it is willing to let this war drag on—or finally push for a way to end it.

Because war does not care about who was right or wrong. It only cares about who is still standing when the dust settles.

?