A to Z of Karnataka Microfinance Ordinance
Karnataka Chief Minster Karnataka Siddaramaiah. Photo courtesy: Mint

A to Z of Karnataka Microfinance Ordinance

Finally, the Karnataka Micro Loan and Small Loan (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025 is in place. It was promulgated by the Governor of Karnataka on 12 February.

Earlier, on February 7, Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot had sent it back to the state government, saying: “Instead of bringing the Ordinance in a hurry, I advise the state to deliberate this issue in details and bring in effective enactment in the interest of the affected people and to protect their rights.” He has pointed out that the Ordinance would benefit the borrowers but affect the lenders and both sections are part of the same society.”

But the state seems to be in a hurry. It did go back to the governor quickly. Now, the Ordinance is in place.

Let’s take a close look at the key issues that the Ordinance has dealt with.

This is an Ordinance to protect and relieve the economically vulnerable groups and individuals, especially farmers, women and women’s self- help groups from the undue hardship of usurious interest rates and coercive means of recovery by Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) or Money Lending Agencies or Organizations operating in the southern state.

# It comes into force at once.

# Nothing in this Ordinance is applicable to any banking or non banking financial company (NBFC) registered with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

All MFIs or money lending agencies or organisations or lenders operating in the State as on the date of the commencement of this Ordinance, will apply for registration before the registering ?authority of the district/villages/towns where they have been operating or propose to operate , within 30 days.

While seeking registration, they need to mention the following:

# The rate of interest being charged

# The system of conducting due diligence and system of effecting recovery

# The list of authorised persons to conduct the activity of lending or recovery of money which has been lent

# The name and address of the borrower

# The total principal amount lent to the borrower

# The amount already recovered from the borrower and the balance amount yet to be recovered

# And, a written undertaking that it shall always act in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance.

No MFI or money lending agencies or organizations or lender operating or intending to start the business of lending money after the commencement of this Ordinance shall grant any loans or recover any loans without obtaining registration under this Ordinance from the registering authority.

The registering authority may, at any time, either suo-motu or upon receipt of complaint by a borrower cancel or recommend to cancel the registration of an MFI or money lending agencies after hearing and assigning sufficient reasons in writing for such cancellation.

No order of cancellation of the registration shall be passed without issuing notice to the MFI or money lending agencies. The lenders will be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard against such a notice.

What about the lending norms?

The government may, by notification, specify the lending norms, collection and recovery practices.

There must be transparency in rates of interest charged. The lenders must mention

# the effective rate of interest charged

# and, all other terms and conditions attached to the loan.

Finally, all communications to the borrowers shall be in the kannada.

The MFIs or the money lenders cannot not use any coercive action either by itself or by its agents for recovery of money from the borrower. For any form of coercive recovery they will be liable for punishment under the provisions of this Ordinance. Of course, the registering authority can suspend or cancel the registration of such lenders.

Finally, the PENALTY for violating the norms.

# Any entity which violates the norms will be tried and punished by a First Class Judicial Magistrate.

# There could be imprisonment – up to 10 years.

# Maximum fine is Rs 5 lakh.

And, the offences under this Ordinance are cognizable and non-bailable.

Let me end this with a question to the Karnataka State Government. Since nothing in this Ordinance is applicable to ?RBI-regulated banks and NBFCs, why does it need such an Ordinance? If it wants to control/punish those money lenders who have been masquerading as MFIs, it makes senses for the state to closely supervise them. For that, instead of brining in a new legislation, the Money Lenders’ Act can be strengthened. Doesn’t that make sense?

The writer is a Consulting Editor with Business Standard and Senior Advisor of Jana Small Finance Bank.

Writes Banker's Trust every Monday in Business Standard.

Latest book?Roller Coaster: An Affair with Banking?

Twitter: TamalBandyo

Website:?https://bankerstrust.in

Robin Mathew

Head - Business Development Strategy @ Asirvad Microfinance Ltd | PGDRM from IRMA | Sales Management | 22 years of experience in Rural and Retail Financial sector | Financial Inclusion

2 天前

As you explained in last paragraph, the purpose of this ordinance may get defeated when it creates confusion. One side it excludes RBI regulated entities while in many instances usage of term "MFI" seen towards compliance of certain actionables. There is no definition of the term MFI seen in the Ordinance. If the purpose is to curtail unhealthy practices by non regulated entities, an amendment of existing Moneylender Act would suffice. Ultimately genuine MFIs and customers only would suffer

回复
Vijay Bhasker Majeti

SVP - Legal at Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited

1 周

I echo with the views of Mr. Bandopadhyay. The Ordinance explicitly barred on applicability to the institutions registered and regulated by Reserve Bank of India. As rightly said, to regulate other players an amendment to prevailing legislation(s) would served the purpose. Given the clear position of Hon’ble Supreme Court on non-application of State money lending legislations to the entities registered with RBI, promulgating such ordinances laterally may not create legal challenges but operational hurdles can be faced by the institutions at ground in interpreting it.

Sachin Pawar Patil

Officer @ Punjab National Bank | Banking Operations, Risk Management | CAIIB

2 周

Indeed Good Decision. If implemented with honesty and without any favor or partiality and corruption

回复
Venkatesh Bijoor

Chief Strategy Officer at Fx First Basis Risk Consulting LLP.

2 周

I think it is a good step by Karnataka State Government. I am sure even NBFC and Bank 's are charging higher intrest rates as well harassment of borrowers for recovery. The retail borrowing outstanding is huge and Mr Tamal should do a research , so that RBI may take timely action. Fintech company are under RBI supervision need to be audited.

回复
THANKA KUMAR P

Operations Head- Micro Finance

2 周

Why NBFC-MFIs alone targeted in this ordinance?, why SFBs, NBFCs,Banks excluded?.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tamal Bandyopadhyay的更多文章

  • Tough Time Ahead For Banking Sector

    Tough Time Ahead For Banking Sector

    What do City Union Bank Ltd, Karnataka Bank Ltd, Bandhan Bank Ltd, South Indian Bank Ltd, DCB Bank Ltd, and Punjab &…

    6 条评论
  • Do We Need Regional Rural Banks?

    Do We Need Regional Rural Banks?

    The government is preparing a notification to implement its one state, one RRB (regional rural bank) plan. Since Goa…

    21 条评论
  • The Phoenix Of India’s Financial System

    The Phoenix Of India’s Financial System

    The mythical phoenix cyclically regenerates itself, combusting to be born again out of its ashes. Some legends say it…

    2 条评论
  • New Flexible RBI, Aware of Cost of Regulations

    New Flexible RBI, Aware of Cost of Regulations

    What Indonesia's central bank had done in January, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) did on Friday — a policy rate cut…

    11 条评论
  • 50:50 Chance Of A RATE CUT

    50:50 Chance Of A RATE CUT

    A fiscally prudent, consumption-oriented Union Budget is behind us. That was the first act of a two-act drama typically…

    10 条评论
  • Money In People’s Hands, And More

    Money In People’s Hands, And More

    Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s eighth Budget speech, her shortest to date (just one hour and 14 minutes), ticked…

    4 条评论
  • A Budget Beyond Popcorn

    A Budget Beyond Popcorn

    In the Indian economy’s calendar, the two most important events are the Union Budget and the monetary policy of the…

    6 条评论
  • Greed to Fear, Changing Faces of Cyber Fraud

    Greed to Fear, Changing Faces of Cyber Fraud

    Retired schoolteacher Eloise Parker has a lonely life but shares a warm friendship with Adam Clay, who lives in her…

    6 条评论
  • What Lies Ahead In The Year Of The Snake?

    What Lies Ahead In The Year Of The Snake?

    Going by the Chinese zodiac, 2025 is the Year of the Snake. The Chinese calendar, which is over 2,000 years old, is…

    8 条评论
  • LOOKING BACK AT 2024...

    LOOKING BACK AT 2024...

    As 2024 comes to a close, let’s look back at how it has been for India’s financial sector. The policy rate remained…

    3 条评论

其他会员也浏览了