If you’re asking yourself whether or not direct mail is dead, then you’re asking the wrong question

If you’re asking yourself whether or not direct mail is dead, then you’re asking the wrong question

There’s too much talk about whether or not direct mail is dead.

Of course it is NOT dead! I get direct mail delivered to me every day. 

The question shouldn’t be about whether it is dead or not. Rather, the question should be about why BAD direct mail is still alive at all.

BAD direct mail should be killed— dead. Good direct mail should be kept alive.

So what about your direct mail efforts? Are they good or bad?

Are they cost effective and efficient?

Are they targeting the right people at the right time? Or, are they splattering a lot of “suspects”?

Are they environmentally friendly?

Are they highly personalized and relevant?

Are they timely?

Are they donor-centric? Emotional?

Have they been tested and optimized?

Have you compared the results of your direct mail efforts with the results attained from other channels?

What do your donors think of them? Have you sought their permission to send them direct mail? Do they merely tolerate them? Do you have any idea how many people got pissed off because of them (swearing they’d never give you a single penny ever again)?

Are you on your organization’s list? You should be! You should see what it feels like to get your direct mail.

 

These are the questions you should be asking. Not whether direct mail is dead or not.

 

MORE CRANKY BLOG POSTS LIKE THIS CAN BE FOUND HERE.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gregory Warner的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了