Is your true video performance lost in the data-jungle of vanity metrics?
Robert Alexander Johnson
Partner, Director Insights and Activation at IIH Nordic | Leadership, Change Management
Play, View, and Time are three words that should be set as the standard for all video performance reporting.
Understanding the definition of these three words when working with video marketing can mean the difference between success or fiasco.
These three words are most often used to justify the cost of a video marketing campaign as well as the metrics used to post-evaluate performance. In 2018, advertisers in America used 28 billion dollars on video marketing – a quarter of all ad spend. With high expectations, a lack of critical knowledge and no standards in place for evaluating effect, the promise of Plays and Views were delivered without questioning the aspect of “Time.” This vanity of video marketing is similar to the early days of commercial broadcasting where advertisers believed the more “spots” they received on a tv station, the better. We know better today.
The combination of Play, View and Time is vital. The more you understand these words, the better you can avoid a waste of marketing investments, unnecessary use of resources, loss of value and effect.
Vanity metrics are inflated at the expense of Quality
Consider the words Play and View and what the words mean to you. Now consider these definitions:
Most media who offer video distribution define the word Play as “the film has started playing.” A “Play” can be any time length, as little as 1 second. Furthermore, technically seen, a Play can occur without a person viewing any content. In summary, a Play has no value unless the amount of time and viewability are included in the evaluation.
The word “View” is defined by most digital media as the percentage of viewability in-screen. An official “View” is often counted with as little as 1% of the content visible in-screen on a device. Low visibility does not build recognition of content therefore a view has no value unless it is defining the % in-screen and length of time of exposure.
Welcome to the Data Jungle
Here are 3 scenarios to illustrate the possible outcome of a video marketing campaign. Which scenario do you feel will produce the greatest memory recall and engagement?
1. An advertiser receives 100,000 Plays of a video where 1% of the video was visible in screen for each Play.
2. An advertiser receives 100,000 Plays of a video where each Play lasted for 1 second.
3. An advertiser receives 10,000 Plays of a video where 10.000 people saw 30 seconds of the video in full screen view.
The following diagram illustrates how differently each social video platform defines Plays and Views.
The top line shows the length of time for a Play to be counted. Below the line shows the in-screen rate required to count as a view.
In summary, consider this advice: Always ask for Play, View, and Time when you evaluate video performance.
Business Development & Integration Specialist at ADEPTUS
5 年Interesting point. I would consider adding play quality/bandwidht/latency to the equation as well, as most modern video services auto-scale the stream to a point where the video quality at the end user - even when playing for 10, 20 or 30 seconds is so low that you can barely make out what is on the screen. I see this as a major problem on mobile devices on congested networks.
CEO at Moving Image, CFO at We Fight Fraud
5 年Thanks Robert Alexander Johnson. I do hope this approach alerts more comms professionals to vanity metrics in video measurement.?
Direkt?r | CEO | Commercial Director | CCO | Board Member | Business transformation | Turn-around | Scale-up | Strategy Development | ESG management | People Development | Bringing out the best
5 年Thank you for bringing attention to this important topic Robert. Well written and very valuable insights!