Is your transformation system documented and understand by leaders?
The threat is real

Is your transformation system documented and understand by leaders?

80% of CEOs believe their business models at risk. They are right; they are at risk.? Several examples will explain why they should be concerned. CivicaRX is a different business model that is eroding the generic drug bad actors' business models! An age-old model disrupted by a new business model. The medicine is the same; the business model is the difference and reason for winning. In the "virtual visit" world we are seeing United allocate $5 billion to enable free virtual visits for its members. That is a major change in the definition of what is considered “revenue” for the business model and will absolutely hurt other “virtual care” companies.? Amazon is weaving together virtual, medications, and a referral path to remove friction in access; they are changing the business model. Costco, by offering $29.00 virtual visits to its members, just changed a key piece of the business model to enable a better option for consumers. And remember, Costco has a robust pharmacy business! UBER, at its pure core, is no different than a taxi, a scooter, a train; they simply move people. They renovated a business model by being the largest transportation company in the world that doesn't own a car; that is just one key change. Nestle changed the business model of coffee with Nespresso. So what in the world are these companies doing that the ones they are beating aren’t?

A few examples may help. P & G once had a consumer is boss effort that became their Superiority Strategy https://us.pg.com/blogs/superiority-innovation-products-you-love/. In 2007, Intuit started its Design for Delight program, which eventually became its Customer Obsession system. Amazon has customer obsession at its core and makes it come alive through its Customer Back program. IKEA has Life at Home as its consumer-driven system. Each of these companies had great leaders but the leaders didn't have the answers; the leaders worked closely with those around them and designed systems that would continually refresh their value propositions and business models. These are companies that have figured out what Rita McGrath effectively described as Transient Advantage. From my perspective these organizations never thought they were building a sustainable competitive advantage; they were implementing systems that would ensure that their advantages never eroded to the point that their customers would leave. In addition, these companies track their consumers' measures of progress. A consumer’s behavior is the ultimate measure; what is causing them to choose or not choose the product or service. ?

Organizations need to determine their measures of transformation. We hear phrases such as we are going to transform the company! What does that mean? What will it look like when it is transformed? What will the new consumer measures be to prove we are transforming what the consumer wants us to transform? If we haven’t done the deep consumer/customer homework to understand what transforming would look like and be in their lives, then we aren't designing our organizations to transform.? We will not have a system that can give our organizations the ability remain in lock step with changing consumer preferences.

I propose that a documented and clear transformation system driven by deep consumer insights, market trends, etc. must be clear and understood by leaders. Deming once said "if you can't describe what you are doing as a process, you don't know what you're doing". If you are a CEO or C-Suite member and one of the 80% worried about your business model and don’t have a documented transformation system, you have a right to be concerned. However, a system can be designed and scaled across your company. Would enjoy learning how others are thinking about this.

Janet Guptill, FACHE, CPHIMS

President & CEO, Scottsdale Institute

1 年

In healthcare we need to celebrate low-cost high-value transformational changes that reduce total cost of care and restore health to the communities we serve - that's the long game we need to be playing in healthcare!

回复
Rita McGrath

C-Suite Strategist | Thinkers 50 Top 10 | Best-selling author | Columbia University Business School Professor

1 年

This is so true, Todd Dunn. Innovation should be a systemic process, not the result of heroics. And people certainly shouldn't think in capitalist systems that it isn't an #innovation arms race!

Ann-Somers Hogg

Health care innovator | Speaker | Podcast host | Author | Research leader making work and life better for moms

1 年

Todd Dunn - yes, a systematic approach to transformation is critical. Leaders must also ensure they are pursuing an appropriate business model change for their circumstance. This includes articulating their mission, vision and beliefs about the future; assessing their business model’s current and future viability; and understanding their tolerance for risk. Then they can determine the right business model strategy for their organization. I share a strategy guide and decision tool for how to go about this in a recent report: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/doh-improve-transform/ And as you note, it must all be grounded upon the progress the customer is seeking to achieve.

Igor Gorlatov

Founder at Traction5 & Advisory5 | Senior Consultant & Executive Coach at Groove Management | Health Tech Innovation Advocate

1 年

Todd Dunn, your article on the necessity of a documented transformation system for business models is both timely and insightful. However, I think it's crucial to consider another dimension to this issue. As Clayton M. Christensen, Thomas Bartman, and Derek van Bever point out in their article "The Hard Truth About Business Model Innovation", "it's not the attributes of the innovator that principally drive success or failure, but rather the nature of the innovation being attempted." They argue that business models evolve through predictable stages, and understanding these stages is key to successful transformation. This perspective could add depth to your argument for a documented transformation system. It's not just about having a system; it's about understanding the evolutionary nuances of the business model you're trying to transform. Would love to hear your thoughts on this additional layer of thinking. Link to the article: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-hard-truth-about-business-model-innovation/

Vikas Khosla

Digital Health Growth Strategist | 3x Founder | 6x Entrepreneur | Strategy | Innovation Acceleration | Durable Market Leadership | Strategic Growth Framework | GTM | Market Intelligence as an Asset | Partnerships

1 年

Todd Dunn very much in agreement with your perspective. We can see the benefits of embracing a transient advantage strategy play out in today's healthcare marketplace. The need to evolve and re-invent periodically will be required as the pace of innovation and competition increases going forward. On a related note, I believe a key part of any transformation system should be to identify what Gino Wickman in his book "Traction" calls your "three uniques". One or even two of them can be shared by competitors but all three together must create a differentiated advantage in the marketplace and should be a part of your consumer/customer homework. Sub-systems to measure, refine, protect or re-invent your "three uniques" will lead to other needed changes required to keep the business in a durable leadership position. Thanks again for another insightful article.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了