Are Your Policies Working AGAINST you?
Colonel Dr James N Phillips Jr., LT, SC, USN Ret
Founder - Remember Veteran Grave Markers, Inc., Navy Veteran, Kentucky Colonel, The Contracting Guy, Chevalier SMOTJ, Brand Ambassador, Son of Confederate Veteran, Son of American Revolution, Social Media Influencer
Recently I was with my wife and her 87 year old mother at a small diner in Toledo, OH. We coming to the end of our meal and commenting on the meal. My wife's mother commented on how her toast was not toasted enough. The server came by and passed the bill to us. I commented on the toast that my wife's mother had. The waitress looked at the plate and said that since more the half was consumed, she couldn't do anything about it. I asked why is that, she said it was the policy.
The policy, what policy? It was not written in the menu! After having flashbacks about a toast exchange at a diner between Peter Fonda and a waitress in Easy Rider, I returned to the diner.
We have been there to this place multiple times, this was the first time I have heard of such a policy. How does one ascertain what constitutes over 50% consumption. She didn't take the fragments and do a post mortem.
Heck, she wasn't even asking to remake the toast, just commenting! So rather than saying, "Sorry to hear that, is there anything I can do to make you feel better?" to her, the server just said, "It is our policy."
Incensed about the matter of fact lack of empathy, we then asked the server's supervisor, to which her reply was, "It is management's policy." So for two slices of bread, perhaps be valued at $0.10 (not counting labor and processing) the wait staff had effectively alienated a customer.
Perhaps if they would have said something like, "I understand, I am sorry you found the toast to not meet your expectations. Is there anything I can do to make you feel better about this?" This would have shifted off the decision to the customer to which the customer might say, "No" or "Yes", preserving the friendly relationship.
In my experience above we would have ordered a couple slices of pie which would have brought the bill to $30. With Good service a 20% tip is warranted ($6.00); with Great service 30% or greater ($9.00 +). However in this case due to the blaming of the policy, the tip was less than 10% ($2.00).
Assuming good service a service fee of $6.00 was warranted we would paid $6.00 service fee. After being confronted by the policy (value of the bread $0.10), it dropped the service fee from $6.00 to $2.00, a loss of $4.00. When the looking at the cost of the bread ($0.10) and the delta between what they would have received from what they did receive, they took a $4 dollar hit over a $0.10 piece of toast.
The problem as I see it is that the policy provided the server, the one on the front line, no flexibility to make customer service decisions impacting the quality of the experience of the guest. At this establishment it was my way of the highway, or the veritable Soup Nazi, "No soup for you!" Perhaps one day they will grant to the server the discretion to make positive customer services changes.
And so here is MY policy. Whenever service is superior, I will reward that service with a premium service fee of 30% or greater over the pretax total; where service is good but not exceptional, I will award it with 20% service fee over the pretax total; however, where service is substandard (or there is a stupid policy), I will award it with less than 20% of pretax total.
Cutting through red tape, streamlining processes, and making common sense prevail in contracting.
4 年It's great how you quantified this - although it's a simplified version of what happens in the business world, it's extremely relevant.? If you can break the policy without breaking the machine, then break it and move on.? If there is an authority that needs to break it for you, then make that happen!
Contracting Officer / ELE Trainer
4 年Sir, These days, adaptability is much more important than efficiency. From a minor incident, we have a decent lesson for those policy makers -- the world demands flexibility and quality.
Founder - Remember Veteran Grave Markers, Inc., Navy Veteran, Kentucky Colonel, The Contracting Guy, Chevalier SMOTJ, Brand Ambassador, Son of Confederate Veteran, Son of American Revolution, Social Media Influencer
4 年Thank you Mr. Pham. Appreciate your comment. As I thought about this I pondered the numerous policies that restrict or inhibit the ability of a server (or anyone) to exercise discretion. I recently read an article on LinkedIn that addressed self sabotaging systems, and can’t help to think of how we try to inoculate ourselves from risk, only to open up another vulnerability. Thanks Mr. Pham!
Contracting Officer / ELE Trainer
4 年In the world of hospitality, Policies are made to be broken simply because that industry functions and survives by the perception of its customers. I stayed in it for over 17 years before joining DoD. One time, I was a manager for a popular and successful brand. But I recalled that they made 2 silly policies. One, managers can spend maximally 2 minutes at each table. I disagreed. Some tables won't even need a manager if everything goes well; other tables might require the managers attention, especially when a severe mistake happens such as pouring red wine on a white shirt by accident. Two, no tables combining. To promote couples, the management tries to discourage groups, so they came up with this. Each of these dining rooms, by design, has only 2 tables accomodating six. How can we handle parties of 5 or more, if we cannot put two square 4 tops together. Mr. Phillips, I would agree with you. In the bad toast scenario, a well-trained server would have done something for the guest, right 30 seconds after she brought the food out, not when presenting the bill.