Your Organization is Damned. What Would You Bet to Save It?
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe by Stiehler, 1828, Pubic Domain

Your Organization is Damned. What Would You Bet to Save It?

I have said that there is no such thing as a business process that isn’t delivered through technology for years. How is it then that organizations cling to models for promotion and compensation that damn not only the organization, but also the people who deliver that technology?

Damned might seem like a strong word.

But who hasn’t struggled with the global talent shortage? The pandemic of disengaged and overburdened staff? Retaining talented people? These are problems leaders in organizations face every day. How can we build the teams who deliver the technology, products, and services our customers need without the people who deliver them? It took me over a year to recruit my team to full strength. Today, the nightmare that wakes me up in the middle of the night is the one where one of them has left…

And I’m the lucky one!

Several of my colleagues still struggle to recruit the technology talent they need. In the past few weeks I’ve only seen my colleague Carlos as he staggered from interview to interview like a zombie. Aaron had two key people poached and won’t be in next week as he heads onsite to ensure we deliver on our commitments to our members.

It might not feel that way right now, but my colleagues are lucky too!

Info-Tech is one of those rare companies that offers the people who deliver their products and services the same opportunity for advancement and compensation as the management team. Top people on my team not only have the opportunity to make more than I do. They actually do! Sooner or later, Carlos and Aaron’s teams will be back up to strength and humming along. Talent attracts talent, and our model gives them room to do what they love to do. Does yours?

Organizations are offering the wrong bargain.

Faust and Mephistopheles, Kaulbach, ~1900, Public Domain

Jeff Watkins is a colleague at AND Digital in the UK and contributor to our research. AND is organized around similar principles to Info-Tech. That shared context created an novel insight in our conversation this morning. I proposed that most organizations offer their best technology people a modern day version of Faust’s Bargain. If you’re not familiar with it, the Bargain goes like this. “You can have wealth, position, and fame… as long as you give up your soul.” Their soul, in this case, is delivery of exceptional, innovative technology, products, and services. In return they get to manage people, sit in a boardroom, and have some extra zeros on their pay stub. It’s a bad bargain for them.

The bargain is worse for their organizations.

When we pull our best and brightest out of delivery we’re damned seven ways from Sunday. We create a vacuum in the teams that actually deliver the technology. It takes time to backfill. Delays ensue. Bolman and Deal also found we also create disruption, conflict, and often burn out both the teams and the newly minted “leader.” We also create waste as the precious knowledge in their heads is now only available in dribs and drabs. It’s a bad bet all around.

There is a better bet.

Blaise Pascal, Unknown, ~1700, Public Domain

Jeff proposed we replace our Faustian Bargain with a new take on Pascal’s Wager. “Technology and the people who deliver it are the soul of a modern, digital, organization. We need to break the damnable bargain that forces our best and brightest technology people to give up what they love best in return for the paltry rewards of position.” If we’re going to save the soul of the digital age, we need to be ready to bet everything on the people who deliver that technology.


What do you need to do to make this happen?

nuno borges

Organizational Systems Designer / Coherence miner with Blockchain / Anthro-complexity student / Blogger / Periodic speaker

5 年

Nice article. This dialog is definitely essential. I would start with the critical premise "we need to stabilize the craft to save the soul of the digital age". Consider how self-organizing systems thrive on the edge of criticality (edge of chaos), where they are precariously perched between order and chaos. If we have too many attractors (strong profession), we may lose all adaptive capacity in a digital age that thirsts for innovation to fuel moore's law. If we have too many attractors, we risk the digital chaos of a technically driven anarchy. Although my heart says we should 'Organize' and 'Elevate!' our craft, my rational self understands the danger of reducing our adaptive capacity to a crawl, especially at a time in our history when innovation is desperately needed to stay abreast of science. For example, climate and sustainability tech is not an issue with bad technology gone awry - it is an issue of science rapidly outpacing our ability to understand and control it through technology. My chosen research paradigm is heavily based on complexity, which forces me to strip most ethical concerns from an a priori examination of a system, and instead, to relegate it to an emergent attribute. I guess that makes me a filthy postmodernist. :)

Alex Ciraco

PAL? PSM? Principal Advisory Director at Infotech Research Group

5 年

Thanks for the insightful thoughts on how organizational behavior and structure need to change (like so many other things) to keep up with the digital revolution (and I'm happy to be along for the ride).

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Cole Cioran的更多文章

  • How to Walk on the Broken Glass of Organizational Life

    How to Walk on the Broken Glass of Organizational Life

    “I love the work, it’s the organization that’s killing me..

    11 条评论
  • How to Survive and Thrive as a Writer in the Age of Creation

    How to Survive and Thrive as a Writer in the Age of Creation

    Our daughter, Aija, was nine when her teacher, Ms. Cohen, said she needed to speak to us after school.

  • How to Make the Case for Artificial Intelligence

    How to Make the Case for Artificial Intelligence

    “ChatGPT turned the work of days into the work of minutes.” This wasn’t a marketing pitch; it was a gushing review from…

  • Much Ado About Facial Recognition

    Much Ado About Facial Recognition

    The tug-of-war between individual liberties and the common good played out in the news this past week. If you missed…

  • The Price of Policing in Canada

    The Price of Policing in Canada

    Crime, Violent Crime, and Statistics Toronto the Good has seemed to be in the grip of a wave of violent crime this past…

    4 条评论
  • What is Excellence in the Age of Generative AI?

    What is Excellence in the Age of Generative AI?

    It’s the fifth anniversary of my father, Nick’s, death. Facebook popped up the memory first thing this morning.

    8 条评论
  • Should Bots Pay Taxes?

    Should Bots Pay Taxes?

    Canadians went into the 2023 Canada Day Long weekend with the headlines decrying price gouging by big Canadian grocers.…

    10 条评论
  • The Devil is in the Definitions

    The Devil is in the Definitions

    My wife, Suzy, often tells people that most of what I do seems to be asking people to define their terms. There is a…

    1 条评论
  • How to Find a Little Grace Amidst the Pandemic

    How to Find a Little Grace Amidst the Pandemic

    I yelled at an old man in a wheelchair today. I had just come around the corner.

    8 条评论
  • Nine! Amazing Virtual Playdates for the Pandemic

    Nine! Amazing Virtual Playdates for the Pandemic

    Seven Amazing Virtual Playdates for the Pandemic I’ll bet the pandemic means I’m not the only parent faced with several…

    9 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了