Are your job interviews a conversation between two liars?
Andre Muscat
Platform Business Leader | Scaling SaaS | M&A | AI | Customer-Centric PLG | Operational Excellence & Strategic Alignment
In an interview by R. Sukmar with Claudio-Fernandex-Araoz , a veteran in the recruitment industry who interviewed 20,000 executives across 40 countries, Claudio observes how traditional interviews often involve critical-point insincerity between the parties. The hirer positions the organisation as a paradise to work within. The candidate over-represents experiences and capabilities, often leaving both sides wondering the extent of the “truth” behind the words.?
As I researched this position, the scale of the problem struck me. A report by Workforce and another by Forbes find 70% to 85% of employers have caught applicants lying, and Resume Builder finds 40% of hiring managers admit to intentionally lying.
This is dreadful! We recognise both sides feel immense pressure to please, as the organisation needs to fill a capacity/strategic need, and the candidate needs a salary. Both face significant risk when dishonesty lies at the core of the initial stages of their relationship and strongly suggests a mutually anxious and horrible hiring experience before, during and after placement, especially if either side entered into this conversation with a desperate state of mind.?
This initial platform of distrust and hope ultimately harms everyone involved, making the hiring process less efficient and effectively undermines the potential for successful, lasting employment relationships.
There must be a better way!
You need to build interviews as genuinely deep conversations that shout-out trust at its core. Otherwise said, you need to de-risk the need of the individual to lie, or be less truthful.?
As a Candidate, how can you de-risk?
It is critical for you to research the organisation and their leadership on:
Try and find information that promotes working at that particular organisation and detractors. It will give you talking points to explore in your interview. Prepare to ask questions around:?
If a company dodges replying to these questions, consider these red flags in your decision making process.?
领英推荐
You can also reach out to an ethical professional recruiter whose sole purpose is to help you frame your needs and connect you with great workplaces that fit your capabilities, risk appetite and style.?
As a Hirer how can you de-risk?
Here, it is critical for you to present a balanced state-of-your business including:?
Ask candidates a mix of behavioural, situational and career development questions that explore how they handled past situations involving problem solving, career development and future goals such as:?
Engage in reference check practices. You may very well learn many things from the people that worked with the candidate, even if they were references suggested by the candidate themselves.?
When word gets out that your hiring practices are centred around honesty, your employer brand receives a significant boost. Potential candidates will see your company as trustworthy and transparent, which increases the value of options within your applicant pool.? A strong employer brand also minimises the need for expensive marketing tactics to fill roles. This translates into a direct positive impact on your HR department's ROI.
Also, to further de-risk, you can engage a professional ethical recruiter that is experienced in hiring within your industry. This both significantly de-risks the hiring process for both you and the candidate , offering a better return on investment (that goes beyond access to the recruiter database of candidates).??
Parting thoughts
The traditional interview approach is flawed, and while ditching them entirely is not practical, a shift in focus is needed. Interviews should prioritize genuine conversations, tangible evidence, and specificity rather than superficial charm. It's crucial to move away from the idea that "perfect" on paper equates to real-life perfection. Hard conversations can not only build trust but also demonstrate competency.
If you're not sure what to do, you can always ask for help from experienced and trustworthy recruiters. They can save you a lot of time and aggravation. But let's be real, they're not cheap. So, you might not be able to hire them for every job opening. But hear me out, their job isn't just to fill positions. They want to help you figure out what you really need and find candidates who are a great fit for your company. They don't want to send candidates to bad jobs because it would hurt their reputation both for future hirers, and candidate pipelines!. Leverage their years of experience, to help you spot inconsistencies, and figure out what you really want and need.?
Whichever path you choose to follow - solo or supported - I strongly suggest sticking to the hard truth - in all of your conversations, including what works and what works less well. You may be surprised on how deep that initial truth-based conversation can evolve into a valuable longer-term journey together, built on a solid foundation of continuous trust.
Talent Acquisition & Management | People & Culture | HR Project Management
7 个月While it may appear to be an easy fix for both parties in the short term, in the long run its a terrible choice putting the business and someones career at risk. I suppose the talent shortage and turbulent market needs kinda put both parties in a wierd place. Competency based interviews and psychometric tests are often powerful tools in such cases.
Client Care Executive / Creature of love
7 个月I'm usually overly honest and I get many surprised expressions which lead to very long and transparent conversations...then again, I always say I'm from a different planet. I also like to interview my potential future employer so question intensity is both ways. It is ridiculous to start off an employment journey on a basis of untruths. That can definitely not lead to anything positive.