Your Job Architecture Is Holding You Back: It’s Time to Build a Smarter System for Skills
Janice Robinson Burns
Transformative Human Capital Expert: Driving Business and Personal Success to New Heights!
This year kicked off with a bang for me and my colleagues at Skill Collective. Last year, the buzz was all about skills-powered talent strategies. Everyone wanted to know how to develop one. But this year? The questions have changed. Clients are coming to us with a new realization: their job architecture just isn’t cutting it in this age of skills. They’ve got the foundation, but they’re finding out the hard way that a foundation alone doesn’t make a building—let alone a smart, adaptable one.
So, why the sudden scramble to upgrade? Because job architecture, in its traditional form, was never designed to support the dynamic world we’re in now. It’s like trying to turn a flip phone into a smartphone. Sure, the basics work—but good luck streaming Netflix or navigating with GPS. If you want to build a smart, dynamic building for managing talent, you need more than a static framework; you need one enriched with real-time data on skills and work. Let’s dive in.
Traditional Job Architecture: The Foundation of a Building
Picture a building—a solid foundation is the first step. That’s your traditional job architecture.
In other words, traditional job architecture is a great starting point, but if you’re relying on it to fuel your skills strategy, you’re already behind.
Dynamic Job Architecture: The Smart Building on the Foundation
Now let’s upgrade that foundation. Imagine a smart building—one that’s intelligent, adaptable, and future-ready. That’s dynamic job architecture in action. It takes the traditional framework and brings it to life with skills data, flexibility, and adaptability.
With a dynamic architecture, you’re not just organizing jobs; you’re building a system that aligns talent, skills, and business goals seamlessly.
From Bones to Nervous System: The Big Picture
Here’s the deal:
领英推荐
You need both. The foundation gives you structure, but the nervous system gives you agility and relevance. Without the latter, you’re stuck managing roles in a world where skills are the currency of success.
Making the Shift: How to Build a Skills-Powered Job Architecture
Transitioning to a skills-powered framework isn’t just a nice-to-have—it’s a must. But let’s not sugarcoat it: it’s not as easy as slapping on a skills layer and calling it a day. Here’s how you start:
The Reality Check
Let’s be real: evolving your job architecture is hard work. It takes time, expertise, and a willingness to rethink how you’ve been doing things for decades. You’ll need the right tools, data, and mindset to make it happen. And you might need some help along the way—because turning a static foundation into a smart building that lasts isn’t a DIY project.
But here’s the upside: when you get it right, you’re not just building a structure; you’re creating a system that empowers your workforce, aligns with your business goals, and sets you up to thrive in an unpredictable future.
Final Thought
A job architecture without skills data is like a skeleton without muscles—functional but lifeless. To truly support skills-powered talent practices, you need more. It’s time to upgrade to a hybrid approach that combines the stability of traditional frameworks with the dynamism of skills.
Ready to transform your foundation into a smart building? Let’s talk. ??
Global Leader of Human Capital Workforce Transformation | Thought Leader | Board Member | Executive Coach | Retired Managing Director, Deloitte Consulting
1 个月Great to see what you are doing!
Learning Functional Manager en Dyson
2 个月Janice Robinson Burns, great one, it is exactly the problem that we are facing now. The lack of granularity in the Roles makes it hard to map skills to them (i.e.: an Engineer role to cover all engineering specialties such a Electronic Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Software Engineer is useless). Instead aligning tasks to roles would justify increasing the number of roles ?? to map skills to, but as you said, the traditionally job architecture offering stability ?? also seems to make organizations afraid to touch them, maybe they don't have standard processes to touch them, so every time you have to do it feels like a major project. It also pushes HR to work hand to hand with the "business" or whomever should provide HR with the tasks and it feels like the business is waiting for a "ready to use" solution from HR without participating. What would you all suggest to help organizations not to think of changes in Job Architectures with terror?
Chief Learning Scientist | Skills Nerd | Org Psych | Business Transformation | “Training” Hater | NYSE:EPAM
2 个月Janice Robinson Burns Love #1 tip for getting started! I’d also add that leveraging technology (#2) is app licable to task data, too. AI allows for real time labor market intelligence on the tasks companies are associating with specific roles, as well as the degree to which each task is susceptible to automation or AI. It’s amazing what today’s technologies can do to support the dynamic job architecture you’re describing.
Helping Companies Future-Proof Workforce Skills | CEO at Simply Get Results | Strategic Advisor on Workforce Planning & Human Capital | Speaker on Data-Informed Skills Transformation
2 个月JRB has a real flair for metaphor and analogy, expertly demonstrated here! From my time as a practitioner, the job architecture was always a backbone for HR, but often felt like the things that made it necessary and great (structure, consistency, completeness, external comparability etc) were also its biggest flaws. Performance management? Career paths? Job design? Comp? Can't change anything without hitting the job architecture sooner or later! In the last few years it has become possible to work with a more dynamic job architecture, or at the very least to take the pain out of keeping it up to date and communicating what's changed. Applying internal and market data to inform job architecture, and the skills infrastructure alongside it, can be done cost effectively and simply (pun intended, sorry not sorry...). That said, job architectures - or the content of them that matters to people such as the title structures, grading, benefit ranges etc - are still vital. Good luck running a company of any scale without one! But you no longer need to be afraid of getting stuck in and keeping it up to date in a more dyanmic way. A stronger connection between business outcomes, activities and skills insight makes it possible.