Your Job Architecture Is Holding You Back: It’s Time to Build a Smarter System for Skills

Your Job Architecture Is Holding You Back: It’s Time to Build a Smarter System for Skills

This year kicked off with a bang for me and my colleagues at Skill Collective. Last year, the buzz was all about skills-powered talent strategies. Everyone wanted to know how to develop one. But this year? The questions have changed. Clients are coming to us with a new realization: their job architecture just isn’t cutting it in this age of skills. They’ve got the foundation, but they’re finding out the hard way that a foundation alone doesn’t make a building—let alone a smart, adaptable one.

So, why the sudden scramble to upgrade? Because job architecture, in its traditional form, was never designed to support the dynamic world we’re in now. It’s like trying to turn a flip phone into a smartphone. Sure, the basics work—but good luck streaming Netflix or navigating with GPS. If you want to build a smart, dynamic building for managing talent, you need more than a static framework; you need one enriched with real-time data on skills and work. Let’s dive in.

Traditional Job Architecture: The Foundation of a Building

Picture a building—a solid foundation is the first step. That’s your traditional job architecture.

  • The Good: It provides structure, stability, and uniformity. It organizes roles and ensures consistency in pay, titles, and career paths. It’s reliable. Predictable. Necessary.
  • The Not-So-Good: A foundation is static. It’s fixed in place and can’t adapt to the constantly changing needs of today’s workforce. It doesn’t capture the nuances of how work evolves or the agility demanded by modern business.

In other words, traditional job architecture is a great starting point, but if you’re relying on it to fuel your skills strategy, you’re already behind.

Dynamic Job Architecture: The Smart Building on the Foundation

Now let’s upgrade that foundation. Imagine a smart building—one that’s intelligent, adaptable, and future-ready. That’s dynamic job architecture in action. It takes the traditional framework and brings it to life with skills data, flexibility, and adaptability.

  • Dynamic Design: It’s like a building with modular walls that can be reconfigured as needs change. Roles aren’t locked into rigid boxes but evolve alongside the work.
  • Skills Data as the Operating System: Think of skills as the tech backbone—tracking what’s working, identifying what’s needed, and optimizing everything in real-time.
  • Adaptability: Dynamic job architecture evolves constantly. It reflects what’s happening in the workplace today, not what was true five years ago when someone last updated the org chart.

With a dynamic architecture, you’re not just organizing jobs; you’re building a system that aligns talent, skills, and business goals seamlessly.

From Bones to Nervous System: The Big Picture

Here’s the deal:

  • Traditional Job Architecture: It’s the bones of your organization. Solid, stable, and essential.
  • Dynamic Job Architecture: It’s the nervous system. It connects everything, responds to signals, and drives action.

You need both. The foundation gives you structure, but the nervous system gives you agility and relevance. Without the latter, you’re stuck managing roles in a world where skills are the currency of success.

Making the Shift: How to Build a Skills-Powered Job Architecture

Transitioning to a skills-powered framework isn’t just a nice-to-have—it’s a must. But let’s not sugarcoat it: it’s not as easy as slapping on a skills layer and calling it a day. Here’s how you start:

  1. Map Skills to Tasks: Break roles down into core tasks and map the skills needed to perform them. Move beyond generic job descriptions to capture the specifics.
  2. Leverage Technology: Use AI-powered platforms to identify emerging skills, track trends, and link them directly to your job architecture. Real-time data is your friend.
  3. Adopt a Dual-Track Model: Combine your traditional job framework (for structure) with a skills framework (for flexibility). Think of it as having a blueprint and a 3D printer.
  4. Focus on Transferable Skills: Highlight skills that cut across roles to enable internal mobility. Create career pathways that are flexible, not rigid.
  5. Embed Continuous Learning: Use your job architecture to identify skill gaps and integrate learning opportunities directly into the system. Make growth part of the job.

The Reality Check

Let’s be real: evolving your job architecture is hard work. It takes time, expertise, and a willingness to rethink how you’ve been doing things for decades. You’ll need the right tools, data, and mindset to make it happen. And you might need some help along the way—because turning a static foundation into a smart building that lasts isn’t a DIY project.

But here’s the upside: when you get it right, you’re not just building a structure; you’re creating a system that empowers your workforce, aligns with your business goals, and sets you up to thrive in an unpredictable future.

Final Thought

A job architecture without skills data is like a skeleton without muscles—functional but lifeless. To truly support skills-powered talent practices, you need more. It’s time to upgrade to a hybrid approach that combines the stability of traditional frameworks with the dynamism of skills.

Ready to transform your foundation into a smart building? Let’s talk. ??

Amy A. Titus

Global Leader of Human Capital Workforce Transformation | Thought Leader | Board Member | Executive Coach | Retired Managing Director, Deloitte Consulting

1 个月

Great to see what you are doing!

Igor Torrealba

Learning Functional Manager en Dyson

2 个月

Janice Robinson Burns, great one, it is exactly the problem that we are facing now. The lack of granularity in the Roles makes it hard to map skills to them (i.e.: an Engineer role to cover all engineering specialties such a Electronic Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Software Engineer is useless). Instead aligning tasks to roles would justify increasing the number of roles ?? to map skills to, but as you said, the traditionally job architecture offering stability ?? also seems to make organizations afraid to touch them, maybe they don't have standard processes to touch them, so every time you have to do it feels like a major project. It also pushes HR to work hand to hand with the "business" or whomever should provide HR with the tasks and it feels like the business is waiting for a "ready to use" solution from HR without participating. What would you all suggest to help organizations not to think of changes in Job Architectures with terror?

Sandra Loughlin, PhD

Chief Learning Scientist | Skills Nerd | Org Psych | Business Transformation | “Training” Hater | NYSE:EPAM

2 个月

Janice Robinson Burns Love #1 tip for getting started! I’d also add that leveraging technology (#2) is app licable to task data, too. AI allows for real time labor market intelligence on the tasks companies are associating with specific roles, as well as the degree to which each task is susceptible to automation or AI. It’s amazing what today’s technologies can do to support the dynamic job architecture you’re describing.

John Guy

Helping Companies Future-Proof Workforce Skills | CEO at Simply Get Results | Strategic Advisor on Workforce Planning & Human Capital | Speaker on Data-Informed Skills Transformation

2 个月

JRB has a real flair for metaphor and analogy, expertly demonstrated here! From my time as a practitioner, the job architecture was always a backbone for HR, but often felt like the things that made it necessary and great (structure, consistency, completeness, external comparability etc) were also its biggest flaws. Performance management? Career paths? Job design? Comp? Can't change anything without hitting the job architecture sooner or later! In the last few years it has become possible to work with a more dynamic job architecture, or at the very least to take the pain out of keeping it up to date and communicating what's changed. Applying internal and market data to inform job architecture, and the skills infrastructure alongside it, can be done cost effectively and simply (pun intended, sorry not sorry...). That said, job architectures - or the content of them that matters to people such as the title structures, grading, benefit ranges etc - are still vital. Good luck running a company of any scale without one! But you no longer need to be afraid of getting stuck in and keeping it up to date in a more dyanmic way. A stronger connection between business outcomes, activities and skills insight makes it possible.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Janice Robinson Burns的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了