Are your employees being gaslighted?

Individual solutions to structural problems is gaslighting!

Gaslighting is an insidious form of manipulation and psychological control. Victims of gaslighting are deliberately and systematically fed false information that leads them to question what they know to be true. I go back to W. Edwards Deming, to achieve success focus on improving the system not on individual performance. “A company could put a top man at every position and be swallowed by a competitor with people only half as good, but who are working together.” Today there is a heavy focus on individual performance and rewards over focus on the organization as a system. We still see annual performance reviews and individual bonuses. Fortunately, the use of rank and yank or firing the lowest 10 percent annually, has decreased.

Deming’s understood that it is easy to optimize components within a system which can lead to systemic issues within the whole system. We find the same concept in investigating value streams for local optimizations.

Blaming the individual can have consequences:

  • It can focus attention on single component instead of the whole value stream.
  • Systemic change at the organizational level can become more difficult.
  • It can allow those with power and influence to control dissident within the organization.
  • Many times, it can reinforce stereotypes.
  • People can play the blame game and look for scape goats instead of identifying the real issue.
  • A culture of keeping one’s head down and other negative behavior can become part of the organizational culture.

I can go on, but you get the point. Organization can morph into dysfunctional workplaces. Just Google “Toxic workplaces” and you will find tons of article on this. In these toxic work places gaslighting is common. For the organization does not acknowledge that it is a toxic work place. So, the issue must be with individuals. A false paradigm is created that protects the status quo against any meaningful change.

Read some of the article on toxic workplaces and you will see so many of the negative consequences fall on the individual in such an environment. For seldom can an individual fix a toxic workplace. Those individuals who do take on a toxic culture should be prepared to leave the organization! Generally, it required dedicated leadership with enough influence and power to turn things around. For we are talking about the organizational culture. Upper management acknowledging that a problem exists is the first and most important step to dealing with it.

Why am I writing about this? I have been writing about the only constant being change. However, the problems above are some of the very things that can create an organization culture that will be resistant to change. Just having a toxic workplace puts an organization at a major disadvantage with regards to dealing with change from the organizational level down to the individual level. When an organization is in the middle of change it is way too late for management to acknowledge that a problem exists. For they will likely have to deal with both the change and toxic workplace at the same time! Those at the edge of leaving due to the toxic workplace are much more likely to leave with the added stress of dealing with change.

So are your employees being gaslighted?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Alexander Keenan的更多文章

  • Product Manifesto

    Product Manifesto

    David Pereira wrote a article "Agile Manifesto is long gone! We need a product manifesto!". He does have a point in…

  • Is the mainframe dead?

    Is the mainframe dead?

    Is the mainframe dead? The answer is clearly NO. However, the mainframe today is not the mainframe of the IBM…

  • Non-portable tactic knowledge

    Non-portable tactic knowledge

    In my last post I talked about how work relationships and tactic knowledge acquisition were keys to success. So, let’s…

  • Performance is not portable!

    Performance is not portable!

    In the book, Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance, by Boris Groysberg, Groysberg…

  • It starts with Context

    It starts with Context

    I can remember back to my days working at Kroger which I retired from in 2017. There was a demo of Dunnhumby’s shopper…

  • Eisenhower's Urgent/Important Principle

    Eisenhower's Urgent/Important Principle

    Now that I have lived 60 years I can look back in time and really understand what I thought I understood. For example…

  • Meetings = WORK

    Meetings = WORK

    Per USA 29 CFR 785.27 According to regulations, an employee’s time attending a meeting, seminar, lecture, or training…

  • Sustainability

    Sustainability

    It has been some time since I have published an article. If you just read this without reading the links you may not…

    3 条评论
  • Technical debt or bad design?

    Technical debt or bad design?

    Technical debt is a subject many are well aware of and have different opinions on. I take I have on this subject is…

    1 条评论
  • Fried green tomatoes

    Fried green tomatoes

    I am going to use fried green tomatoes as a metaphor for change. I live in Southern Ohio and every year I garden.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了