Your D&O Policy is on Empty
When I used to work as a D&O broker for publicly traded companies, the goal was to always broaden coverage (broaden your coverage grants and narrow your exclusions). If you're trying to win business, do a coverage audit and show the client, why in this specific random scenario - coverage doesn't trigger and the personal assets of Board Members are at risk. For Brokers, it's the constant push for who can negotiate coverage better.
-----------
D&O Insurance for Private Companies is a totally different beast. For one, D&O Insurance for private companies not only provides coverage for directors and officers (in many cases even employees), but the coverage also provides expansive coverage for the entity (outside of just the public D&O policy's entity coverage for shareholder claims). Combine this with 100% defense allocation - the policy can act as protection for a variety of legal disputes.
So, like publicly traded companies, should the goal be to provide the broadest coverage, specifically for the entity? That seems logical, right? Maybe your Counsel finds a loop hole and the CFO is ecstatic that the D&O policy is triggered. Maybe it's not a loop hole and your insurer provides expansive entity coverage for something not necessarily expected.
"Ganesh....so what's the point of this?"
The point is that the expansive entity coverage on a small $1M limit policy could deplete your policy limit and your Board is now left with minimal coverage for a true prototypical D&O claim against an individual Board Member. Your D&O policy gauge could be on "E".......
领英推荐
Let's play this scenario out:
My thoughts: Always remember the intent of the policy and why it's being purchased in the first place. The less limit, the more critical this is. Focus on exclusionary carve-backs to clarify intent (excluding something, but adding a shareholder or Side A exception to the exclusion).
-------------
NOTE:?
Specialty Commercial | Fractional COO & Advisor | Consultant | CPCU, RPLU, Licensed Broker | New Ventures, Growth, Transformation
1 年Great, succinct take on this Ganesh Nair! I'm biased since private D&O was the first product I started underwriting, but I always felt like it was an incredibly broad amount of coverage for the price ($2.5K - $4K back in the day for a $1M limit small D&O risk). The downside is definitely that it might be tempting for a company to just throw the policy at a problem, like your example, thinking that they're getting max value out of their Insurance policy without considering limit depletion. The Side A limit reinstatement for unrelated claims is absolutely more than a "nice to have" in a case like that