Is Your Company Screening Out The Best Candidates? (Answer: Yes!)
Liz Ryan

Is Your Company Screening Out The Best Candidates? (Answer: Yes!)

It is a wonderful and very unusual thing when an organization can get out of its own way long enough to hire someone smart and capable. Most recruiting systems, even in small organizations, are designed to hire not the best candidate but the most pliable, docile and obedient one.

If your organization can tell the truth about that sad reality, then you can win in the talent marketplace and win against your competitors, too. To do that, you'll have to tell more truth than many leadership teams can handle, however!

The traditional, broken recruiting process starts with a fundamental mistake -- the design of a job description based on tasks and duties rather than the answer to the question "What business problem will the arrival of our new employee solve?," and it only devolves from there.

We write insulting, bureaucratic job ads that drive the best candidates away and then we advertise our job openings on the side of a barn, as the old expression goes.

The only reason Applicant Tracking Systems exist is because recruiting and HR departments suck at marketing. If we understood that recruiting is a sales and marketing function (something many external but few internal recruiters comprehend -- or perhaps they understand it but are not allowed to act on that knowledge) we wouldn't be overwhelmed with applications.

If we really cared about talent, we would  never have come up with the idiotic idea of screening out candidates based on keywords. That's a business atrocity that can only help your competitors.

If you care about talent, you'd never force job-seekers to fill out online application forms. Do you make your customers populate their own Salesforce records?

You wouldn't dream of doing that, but perhaps your leaders like most leaders have drunk enough toxic lemonade that they believe that prospective customers are Very Important People while job-seekers are scum.

If you aren't sure how your company feels about the relative value of prospective customers versus prospective employees, you can find out very easily! Just try applying for a job at your company and you'll know the truth.

If we cared more about talent than we do, we wouldn't respond to a job-seeker's painstakingly completed online application form by sending them a terse auto-response message, or by ignoring their application completely.

Recruiting practices in most organizations do a better job of driving talent away than inviting talented people in!

The smartest employers have figured this out and rectified the problem. Maybe they use an Applicant Tracking System, but if they do they use it for the sensible purpose of managing applications once they are in-house.

They don't make their applicants complete online forms as though they were applying for a building permit to put an addition on their house. Smart companies go after great candidates and sell them on their opportunities. It isn't hard to do. I did it for years and my colleagues did, too, and we never had trouble filling job openings.

In over two decades as an HR leader I never attended a meeting to talk about talent shortages or to wring my hands along with my fellow managers over the difficulty of finding good people. Talent shortages are imaginary. Every organization has the same talent pool to draw from.

It's called the human race!

You'd fire your Purchasing people if they spec'd imaginary raw materials. When hiring managers create job specs with unrealistic requirements, it is an HR person's job to bring that hiring manager back to earth.

To hire great people, we only have to be smart enough to see that when you create a fun and uplifting environment, you will never worry about finding talent. When you create a great culture, your reputation will spread. Smart people will find you.

If you care about talent, you'll treat job applicants like gold once you've got them into your pipeline. You'll make recruiting for open positions your highest priority. How could it be otherwise?

If the absence of a critical person isn't costing your company time and money, then there's no reason to fill the job opening. If the lack of that person is costing you time and money, then what are you waiting for? -- Hire someone, fast!

Every leadership team gets the culture it deserves. Every organization gets the talent it deserves.

Mother Nature is the best teacher, but her lessons can be tough to take on board.

We have to look inward and see how our own fears and doubts are hurting us before her lessons will sink in.

Only when we can give up the conceit "We are the employer, and therefore job-seekers should bow down to us!" will we realize how simple, how fun and how profitable it is to recruit with a human voice. Who will get the message first: your firm, or the competitors who want to put you out of business? 

Kelly F Allen

Helping individuals in discovering their passion and purpose and connecting this to action and accountability.

7 年

"Only when we can give up the conceit "We are the employer, and therefore job-seekers should bow down to us!" will we realize how simple, how fun and how profitable it is to recruit with a human voice." Love this! Thanks for sharing Liz.

回复
David Igel

Planning/Scheduling/Production at Scott Rotary Seals

7 年

Thanks for sharing Liz....

回复
Mujahid Raza

#Qualit?tskontrolleur, #GlobalGAP Auditor, #QS und Bio Auditor, #Qualit?tsmanager, #QualityControl, #Qualit?tssicherung,

7 年

Thank you very much for informative article

回复
Mark Rome

Private Equity CFO, Successful M&A high multiple, high quality of earnings, Data Driven Strategic Thinker

8 年

Ms. Liz Ryan, thank you for sharing your thoughts! “The traditional, broken recruiting process starts with a fundamental mistake -- the design of a job description based on tasks and duties rather than the answer to the question ‘What business problem will the arrival of our new employee solve?’" In a prior role as a CFO for a technology company, an internal analysis found about 2 in 3 employees that terminate voluntarily have a tenure of less than 2 years. With an average turnover of 15% and an average time to fill vacant positions of approximately 60 days, the loss of profit due to indirect cost recovery exceeded 20%. From a financial perspective, 3 actions were proposed to improve retention, lower the cost of hiring, and recover profit, including: 1. Hire for best possible outcomes rather than the best that apply; 2. Make use of culture fit analytics to better match job candidates with the existing team and work environment; and, 3. Engage in talent hacking to build and maintain a pool of ideal candidates. If technology killed recruiting, can technology fix the “broken recruiting process?”

Mr. President, I think if companies need H1-Bs or simply have a job to fill, companies should be asking the State Unemployment office for workers not the immigration office. And if the state unemployment office cannot find STEM workers from any of the other 50 state unemployment offices then and only then should the unemployment office ask the immigration office to bring in one new H1-B. Asking for an H1-B should not be something a private company should have the power to do directly. Companies don’t turn to state unemployment offices to find workers, instead the federal immigration office has become the de-facto national unemployment office or national job export office. Jobs leak out of America at a horrendous rate. The US immigration bureau should be barred from even consulting with private companies and they should be only consulting with state unemployment offices. The Unemployment Office is not a resource that workers, employers or universities and career counselors can turn to because the system is not working. The job market is now very fragmented due to the internet and the fact so many newspapers have gone out of business in recent years. In the old days, companies put ads in the local newspapers and you could simply buy a paper and find a job locally. We can't even buy a newspaper any more. Boy if I could just go to the unemployment office and know that is the only place I need to go to find work, I would be a happy guy. As it is I have to go to hundreds of company career pages and job boards only to never hear back from anyone. It is virtually impossible to find a job due to fragmentation caused by the internet. Companies all have a career page and they all use a different job posting board like linkedin, monster or a new one that seems to come on the market every day like zip recruiter and they all want you to fill out a profile page which takes about 1 hour. But you have to have a ready-made company list or job board list before you can even find a company website or use any of these services. By funneling all job openings through the state unemployment office or a national unemployment office, workers will have 1 simple place to go to, to find work. You can fix the unemployment and underemployment issue, have a good estimate of the actual unemployment rate, help universities target skills to educate for and you can solve this never ending flood of H1-B's taking jobs when so many people are unemployed or underemployed. Anyway, Thanks, Douglas Ayers

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Liz Ryan的更多文章

  • Five Magical Things That Happen When You Take a Chance

    Five Magical Things That Happen When You Take a Chance

    Dear friends, When we were little kids, we were fearless. We did new and scary things all the time -- not actually…

    20 条评论
  • The Perfect Side Gig?

    The Perfect Side Gig?

    A second income is a necessity now - and an exit ramp for the future Dear friends, When I was a kid, employment was not…

    20 条评论
  • Is Your Brand Telling Your Story?

    Is Your Brand Telling Your Story?

    Dear friends, I understand why people say, "I don't want to have a personal brand." "I'm a person - not a bottle of…

    20 条评论
  • Get Your Dream Job - Registration is Open!

    Get Your Dream Job - Registration is Open!

    Dear friends, I teach my flagship course Get Your Dream Job once per year. Registration for my 2025 cohort is now open!…

    7 条评论
  • My Dream Job Formula (the exact steps)

    My Dream Job Formula (the exact steps)

    Dear friends, My course ‘Get Your Dream Job’ is launching on Wednesday, February 26th. I’m looking for 100 people that…

    14 条评论
  • Get the Job You Deserve in 2025

    Get the Job You Deserve in 2025

    Whether you're stuck in the wrong job or feeling frustrated about your job search, now is the time to get the job you…

    7 条评论
  • Want More out of Your Career? Raise Your Hand!

    Want More out of Your Career? Raise Your Hand!

    I’m calling for everyone who wants more out of their professional life to raise their hand (figuratively and…

    24 条评论
  • Your Invitation to Connect with Me - & Change Your Life

    Your Invitation to Connect with Me - & Change Your Life

    Dear friends, I love to answer the questions that come into my inbox every day, like these: How do I decide on my next…

    24 条评论
  • How I Woke Up - and Took Charge of My Life

    How I Woke Up - and Took Charge of My Life

    How Lora Woke Up Here’s a message that came into my LinkedIn inbox: Hi Liz, I’ve followed you for a couple years. I…

    12 条评论
  • My 2025 Career Guide is Here - Get Yours!

    My 2025 Career Guide is Here - Get Yours!

    Dear friends, Here’s the message that came through loud and clear in 2024: You have power in your life and career, but…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了