Are You Too Dumb to Decide for Yourself?

It would seem so, wouldn’t it, based on the widespread censorship and gaslighting in today’s “free” America. Apparently Americans are considered too stupid to decide for themselves which medical professionals, scientists, and data to believe and base their own medical choices on.

What other reason could there be for the extreme measures taken to silence and discredit thousands of experts and their scientific research?

Dr Peter McCullough is arguably the most censored medical professional out there today. Or at least he is among the most, if not the most censored one. His studies, research, data and explanation of alternatives to and even potentially lethal effects from the “juice” - and the fact that we have learned to avoid using actual terminology in an attempt to evade the auto- censors is further evidence of how far we have veered from a truly free society- is considered by those in power to be something we, the American people, must be protected from hearing.

For those of us who do have the mental acuity and personal fortitude to seek and read this information, the gaslighting campaign serves as the number two punch in the one-two-punch approach to save us from ourselves.?

For instance:

When a certain nobel-prize worthy drug occasionally used in humans and largely used in livestock was found to serve as a powerful piece of the puzzle to solve and address “the Vid”, all information on this was removed from social media, accounts who dared to share such information were warned against it and then abruptly removed as well. Meantime, memes mocking people who gave consideration and support to Dr McCullough’s findings that were also supported by hundreds or even thousands of other medical professionals across the globe were not only permitted to run amuck, but boosted by algorithms to appear more often.?

A December 202 study- the second such study conducted- by Dr. Mccullough and 57 others, spelling out a protocol of treatment that included this drug was met with hostility and active suppression led by the other doctor- the one who holds the purse strings to universities, hospitals, and medical agencies. (His name starts with “F” and rhymes with “ouchie)

This protocol, by the way, included things like extra vitamin C .

This suppression is now considered to be a leading contributor to the deaths of at least half a million ?Americans in the ICU, as noted by some of the leading physicians in the country.?

Even with all the pushback now taking place, and the awakening of many Americans to having been manipulated by people who purport to serve us, the censorship continues. Most recently, Dr. McCullough was censored this week by Linkedin, when he shared his published article on how to purge a certain protein from your system. This protein is introduced into the body in two ways- one is the virus and the other is the “juice.”?

This scientifically based clinical research from experts in medicine was first slapped with a disclaimer that is was “false information’ as determined by the blogging organization known as Science Feedback, which operates without the advice of prominent physicians focused on this issue. It is, though, supported by donors like MIcrosoft and also Apple exec Eric Michaelman, who himself is a large supporter of Obama and other Democrats, as well as funding an organization advocating for climate change policies such as the carbon tax.?

McCullough’s post was then removed, citing that Linkedin’s automated systems detected that the post does not comply with its Professional Community Policies on Misinformation. His post has been removed from public access, and only he can now see it.

Given that esteemed experts like Dr McCullough and hundreds of others are considered untrustworthy, while any “expert” who supports the narratives that lead to “the juice” as being the only way through are funded and promoted, what else can be deduced other than Americans are not smart enough to read contrasting information and determine the truth or credibility for themselves. Therefore, we need ?the “fact checkers” to protect us from any information other than what others determine to be accurate, for us.

Good thing we don’t have a legal system that relies on these same Americans to hear two contrasting presentations of facts, and come to a conclusion on credibility that impacts lives! Whew! That ?would be a disaster, wouldn’t it?