Are you content with your content?
Neil Hughes

Are you content with your content?

I was asked by APQC to participate in a roundtable called KM Professionals Respond: Creating Content People Actually Want, the first part of which was published today. Here are the thoughts I contributed.

Organizations tend to think that their content is of interest to their stakeholders, so they attempt to push it out. Instead, they should rely on making it attractive so that people will desire to pull it.

To use pull instead of push, ask stakeholders what they want, listen carefully to their answers, and then be responsive. Review search results, queries posted in the ESN, email messages sent to distribution lists and official mailboxes, and requests made to knowledge brokers. Look for patterns of missing or hard-to-find content, and then take steps to provide that content and make it easy to find.

To make content easy to find, provide content using multiple ways. Here are some specific suggestions. Also see Articles and Presentations about Content.

Offer these user interfaces

  • Navigation
  • Search
  • Bots
  • Facets
  • Related (since you downloaded X, try Y)
  • A-Z Index
  • Tags
  • Bookmarks
  • Sorted

  1. Most visited
  2. Most liked
  3. Most reused
  4. Newest

Offer these channels

Take advantage of

  • Mobile optimization
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
  • Video
  • Hashtags
  • External social media such as Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram, Quora, SlideShare, etc.

I have been in organizations which

  • Automatically archive or delete content after a specific length of time. I don’t favor this approach, and wrote about it. See Don't automatically archive content; improve search instead for details.
  • Monitor content usage and archive or delete content which has not been accessed after a specific length of time, does not have a current owner, or is deemed to be obsolete. This may be better than basing it only on time, but it still could result in content being removed which may prove useful in the future.
  • Conducted a survey of content to ask explicitly if it should be retained, using a voting mechanism. This can be useful for a small collection or during a content migration.

Here are five suggested ways to make useful content easier to find.

  1. Make the search engine able to limit results by the date of the knowledge object. Defaults can be set to limit results to the last 90 days, one year, or whatever duration is desired. But it should be easy for users to change the date range to include older content in the search results.
  2. Add a “I reused this document” or "I found this useful" button, similar to a “Like” button, but more specific, to all content. Encourage users to click on this button for content they were able to reuse.
  3. Allow content to be tagged with "recommended” or "good example” or "proven practice" by an authoritative source. See Content rating is different behind the firewall for more on recommended tags.
  4. Allow searching by date, tag attribute, most-liked by users, etc., and make content with the most tags, “I reused this document” or "I found this useful" clicks, tagged with "recommended” or "good example” or "proven practice" by an authoritative source rise to the top of search results.
  5. Determine the topics of greatest importance to the organization, curate a list which can be searched and filtered, and feed these as enterprise search best bets with links to the content deemed to be the best for each of these key topics.

I read this content and find it very useful. It was published 6 years before, but very rich. As the Arabic proverb says "The one missed his history, will surely get lost". You will never get foresights if you do not have a wealth of available knowledge and wisdom.

Jacqueline Halupka

Principal at J. Halupka & Associates

9 年

I do agree that old content is not necessarily irrelevant content, so we have to be able to search and filter by date and not necessarily turf the old stuff. However in a business environment it is tempting just to eliminate anything over 2 years old especially if it has not been used for some time. On the other hand, if it's not being used, maybe that's because no-one can find it! I like the idea of sorting by most used, newest, etc. Nothing about KM is simple - the answer always seems to be "it depends".

Mindy Bilgrey

Medical/Pharmaceutical Content Marketing Strategist and Writer

9 年

I like all the information about what to do with content -- that is, once you have it. But, you always need a good foundation -- to start with content that has value, is engaging, and is individualized to your target audience otherwise the outcomes will be poor despite all the fancy tech and analytics that are used.

回复

Olen kiire ja pysimatu....k?ike ei ole aega j?lgida......

回复
Nathan Rosen

?????????????????? ??????????????, ?????????????????????? ????????????????????, ??????????????, & ????????????

9 年

Excellent summary of some useful KM implementations.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Stan Garfield的更多文章

  • Sharing and Subscribing

    Sharing and Subscribing

    Another great week of KMWorld concluded yesterday. I want to take this opportunity to share some content and suggest…

    1 条评论
  • Hazel Hall: Profiles in Knowledge

    Hazel Hall: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 109th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Hazel…

    4 条评论
  • Patti Anklam: Profiles in Knowledge

    Patti Anklam: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 108th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Patti…

  • Clyde Holsapple: Profiles in Knowledge

    Clyde Holsapple: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 107th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Clyde…

    1 条评论
  • Debra Amidon: Profiles in Knowledge

    Debra Amidon: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 106th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. The…

    1 条评论
  • Kent Greenes: Profiles in Knowledge

    Kent Greenes: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 105th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Kent…

    6 条评论
  • Mary Adams: Profiles in Knowledge

    Mary Adams: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 104th article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Mary…

    1 条评论
  • Jay Chatzkel: Profiles in Knowledge

    Jay Chatzkel: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 103rd article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Jay…

  • Helen Lippell: Profiles in Knowledge

    Helen Lippell: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 102nd article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. Helen…

    1 条评论
  • Mary Abraham: Profiles in Knowledge

    Mary Abraham: Profiles in Knowledge

    This is the 101st article in the Profiles in Knowledge series featuring thought leaders in knowledge management. V.

    6 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了