You Can't Break Down Silos

You Can't Break Down Silos

Here's the thing.

There is a common refrain said by those responsible for organisational change. "We need to break down silos". That is a load of absolute Rubbish.

You can't break down silos.

That's not strictly speaking true. You can break down existing silos, but new silos will form almost immediately.

Humans form communities. It's a fundamental trait of our species.

We form physical communities around the spaces we live in, social communities with those we click with, and ideological communities around those with common views (whether that's about politics, sport, or our favourite TV show).

And these communities form organically - even at work. Usually with the people we work with most often. We call these communities, silos.

[Watch on YouTube or continue reading below...]

Be Aware Of...

When talking about communities, there are two important factors you have to be aware of.

First, there is a size limit. Research on non-human primates by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar found that there is a cognitive limit to the number of stable social relationships in a group. Between 100 and 230 - usually rounded to 150 which is often called Dunbar’s number.

This is actually a physical limitation in our monkey-brain.

While Dunbar himself states that this number is only indicative with a high degree of variation, regardless of the number, beyond a certain point communities naturally split.

The second factor to understand is that an unintended, but natural, consequence of communities is the emergence of "us vs them" thinking. The idea that those, not in your community, are “them”. A best, just an “other”. At worst, an enemy working against “us”. While there are good evolutionary reasons for this response, it is very damaging. I'll explore this in a later video.

But here's the thing.

In many organisations, it is actually important to break down silos at work.

Why?

Because most organic silos have formed around the organisational structure. Which, if you remember from a previous video, is not designed to optimise for customer outcomes or the creation of value.

And so, the natural size limit and "us vs them" nature of silos causes tension and conflict which interferes with the need to collaboratively deliver value.

So if these siloes need to be broken down, BUT silos will always, naturally, form, the role of those responsible for organisational change changes. Silos need to be deliberately designed, often through organisational structure, to be constructive to the purpose of the organisation and the needs of the customer.

~ Evan Leybourn / Melbourne, Australia


If you enjoy this, please subscribe to Here's the Thing on YouTube for regular stories, rants, and history lessons.

Peter Merel

Founder XSCALE Alliance. Author "the agile way".

7 个月

You're propagating a commonplace but very unfortunate myth about Dunbar's Numbers here, Evan. And I mean the plural. See my interview with Dunbar at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxR8HkLE11I to hear what he himself says but, basically, 50-60 is the maximum practical size for a business community - nowhere near 150 much less 230! As to silos they're not the same thing as communities. A silo is a form of exclusive resource ownership, and has no inherent relationship with a community. Shared resource ownership using DVCS is a staple of any kind of DevOps community, and the same concept has been extended to physical manufacturing groups in EG. the Musk companies as explained in Justice's keynotes. You may also dig into Quinton Quartel's FAST methods for more on this, as well as, of course, XSCALE's Camelot Model. Making these shared-resource / fluid-teaming methods work depends on changes to accounting paradigm (ie. Goldratt's Throughput Accounting) and reward model (ie. Stack and Case's OBM). So ... maybe read a bit deeper before making pronouncements with the authority vested in you as leader of the BAI. I don't mean to confront you, but I can't help but feel the video and article here don't meet your usual high standards.

回复
Ale? ?tempihar

Helping leaders drive their business transformation in the digital economy / CEO Sparring Partner / Chief Reinvention Officer / Business model Transformation Practitioner / Associate Professor at DOBA Business School

7 个月

I vote for horizontal silos around each customer journey.

Pete Behrens

Founder and CEO, Agile Leadership Journey

7 个月

Embracing the silos, I foresee a new class on the horizon: Certified Value Silos (CVS) - “Our silos protect your value.” ??

Bartwin van der Pols

Organisational change specialist | Author of "Own it or own sh*t" | Podcast Welcome to the Watercooler

7 个月

Aren't silos the negative form of communities? As in, communities will form automatically but should be open to reach out and connect to others, whereas silos are more isolated and selfcentered?

Jess Tayel Dr.

?? Transformation Leadership Institute Founder ?? Your partner in building the #1 capability for leading into the future ?? For leaders & organisations driving change and transformation that lands and leads to growth

7 个月

Insightful perspective! Understanding why silos form and working with them, not against them, can indeed lead to more effective solutions. Thanks!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Evan Leybourn的更多文章

  • Paving the Path to Modern Life

    Paving the Path to Modern Life

    The Unintended Consequences of Small Ideas (Part 2) Here’s the thing: What does the Bristol Turnpike Trust in 1816 have…

    6 条评论
  • The Rise and Fall of Buzzwords

    The Rise and Fall of Buzzwords

    Here's the thing. Buzzwords are powerful ideas made hollow by overuse.

    5 条评论
  • Evan's Theory of Agile Constraints

    Evan's Theory of Agile Constraints

    When it comes to conveying why business agility is important, and with apologies to Eliyahu Goldratt, I often talk…

    16 条评论
  • From Arrogance to Authentic Leadership

    From Arrogance to Authentic Leadership

    Here's the thing. It takes Confidence, Skill, and Empathy - in alignment - to be a successful leader.

    8 条评论
  • The Legacy of Distrust in Modern Workplaces

    The Legacy of Distrust in Modern Workplaces

    Here's the thing. For over 100 years, companies have been built on the premise that they don't trust their workers.

    24 条评论
  • Companies Exist to Serve Their Customers

    Companies Exist to Serve Their Customers

    Here's the thing. Companies do not exist to make a profit.

    8 条评论
  • Where There's A Pill, There's A Way

    Where There's A Pill, There's A Way

    [Watch on YouTube] Here's the thing. It’s the unintended consequences of small ideas that change the world.

    1 条评论
  • Taking my own medicine

    Taking my own medicine

    Society encourages us to see career progression in a singular dimension - up. So, it's unusual for a cofounder and CEO…

    172 条评论
  • An Experiment With History

    An Experiment With History

    Last Friday, after months of work and years of thinking, I finally got the chance to launch an experiment for a passion…

    14 条评论
  • on Inspiration over Imposition

    on Inspiration over Imposition

    If you read my last article, you will see that I believe that both top-down and bottom-up change is a fundamentally…

    17 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了