If You Always Expect The Worst, You May Be Right - But There Is a Cost
Robert Glazer
5X Entrepreneur, #1 WSJ & USA Today Bestselling Author, Top .1% Podcast Host and Keynote Speaker. Board Chair & Founder @ Acceleration Partners
My #Elevate series on LinkedIn has over 300,000 subscribers. Subscribe here to receive future editions directly in your feed.
As individuals and organizations have discussed equity and racial justice over the past year, facilitators have often encouraged dialogue by asking participants to assume positive intent from others. This framing results in more openness and vulnerability, alleviates the fear of accidentally saying the wrong thing, and almost always leads to better outcomes.
I believe this mindset is needed more universally in our lives today and I’ve found myself using the “positive intent” framing more broadly within our company, and even outside of work.
After a year of a global pandemic, people are constantly stressed, and feel let down by many institutions in their lives. This has, understandably, caused many to increasingly expect negative intent as a default, and to question the intentions or actions of both individuals and organizations more often.
We each have a choice between assuming positive or negative intent; each creates a mindset that dramatically impacts our thoughts and behavior.
If you always assume positive intent, it’s true that you’ll likely be disappointed at some point, or suffer a break in trust with an individual or institution. But while people who assume negative intent avoid being disappointed, they carry a far heavier emotional burden as a result. They actually subject themselves to trauma twice, first by worrying about being let down, and again when the actual disappointment comes to fruition.
Many of us aren’t fully aware of the toll it takes to be constantly waiting for the other shoe to drop. This mindset trains our brains to distrust everyone, and this bias will become self-reinforcing when we are occasionally proven right. This thinking also breeds cynicism and fear at a time when we need less of both.
What would it look like if we did the opposite? For the second time in a year, New England Patriots wide receiver Julian Edelman demonstrated how to assume positive intent in a difficult situation.
Last week, Meyers Leonard, a basketball player, used an anti-Semitic slur while playing the video game Call of Duty during a live stream. Edelman, one of the few Jewish professional athletes, posted an open letter in response, writing:
“I get the sense that you didn't use that word out of hate, more out of ignorance. Most likely, you weren't trying to hurt anyone or even profile Jews in your comment. That's what makes it so destructive. When someone intends to be hateful, it's usually met with great resistance. Casual ignorance is harder to combat and has greater reach, especially when you command great influence. Hate is like a virus. Even accidentally, it can rapidly spread.”
He also signed the note by saying, “I'm down in Miami fairly often. Let's do a Shabbat dinner with some friends. I'll show you a fun time. JE."
In a time when we find ourselves caught up in an endless debate on cancel culture, I found Edelman’s approach refreshing and productive; he assumed the best from Leonard and offered to help him understand the implication of his words.
It was similar to the approach Edelman took last year in response to anti-Semitic comments from DeSean Jackson, a fellow football player. In that case, Edelman reached out to Jackson for a conversation and invited him to visit the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum with him in Washington, DC. The two had a productive conversation a few weeks later.
We have a choice. We can assume negative intent from others, and be proven right when things go wrong. Or, we can assume positive intent and occasionally be let down, but build more positive and productive connections along the way.
Is there an area in your life where you’re increasingly assuming negative intent? Do you have a sense of what it is costing you and how you might assume positive intent instead?
Quote of the Week: “When you assume negative intent, you're angry. If you take away that anger and assume positive intent, you will be amazed. Your emotional quotient goes up because you are no longer almost random in your response.” –Indra Nooyi
The above post is a Friday Forward, my weekly leadership note read by 200,000+ leaders in over sixty countries. Join Today to get your copy on Friday mornings, it goes great with coffee.
Robert Glazer is the founder and CEO of Acceleration Partners, an award-winning partner marketing agency ranked #4 on Glassdoor’s best places to work.
NEW - CORE VALUES COURSE
Aligning your life to your core values is the best thing you can do for yourself in 2021. I’m excited to share that curriculum with a wider audience—I have created an on-demand course to walk you through a detailed exercise to create and refine your own list of core values. Join the over 600 people who have taken the course since January.
Strategic HR| Transforming Organisation thru People| HR Analytics
3 年This is a great reminder Robert to be mindful of what choice we assume in the context we are in.
Technician | Electrical & Mechanical Installation | Electrical Harness Build | Engineering | Design
3 年So true, I guess I practise this as part of who I am but find it hard to articulate to others why it makes sense to me.... you've fixed that! Thanks for writing ??
Motivated Servant Leader | IT Nerd | We are what we decide to be. Decide to be awesome!
3 年I don't even know where to start, except to say, that this is all absolutely true. Great article, and saving with my favorites! Thank you for writing this, Robert Glazer!!!
Fleet Administrator and Personal Assistant at Steinmuller Africa
3 年I agree with totally
Head of Performance at EXCEED | TEDx Speaker | Moodset | Performance Guide | Executive Coach | Amazon #1 Bestselling Author | Inspired Facilitator | Servant Leader | CrossFit Athlete
4 年Positive intent. Like it. Perspective drives performance... thanks Robert Glazer