You Are All Wrong About The Jaguar Rebrand
In Defense of Bold Moves: Why Jaguar’s Rebrand is Smart, Even if It Hurts to Watch
Jaguar’s recent rebrand has ignited a fiery debate online, with critics calling it the death knell of a legacy automaker. But let’s pump the brakes and take a closer look. Instead of jumping on the outrage bandwagon, let’s acknowledge this for what it really is: a gutsy move from a brand that needed a wake-up call. Because, love it or hate it, everyone is talking about Jaguar right now. That’s the whole point.
Here’s the thing about rebrands: they’re not just about slapping on a shiny new logo. A brand is an ecosystem of meaning, emotions, and experiences that lives far beyond the design. Jaguar hasn’t been top of mind for a while—except maybe when you see a vintage E-Type cruising by and think, “Wow, remember when Jaguars were cool?” A legacy brand being “forgettable” is way more dangerous than a controversial logo. Forgettable is death in today’s market. Controversy? That’s life support with a megaphone.
A New Roar: Why Standing Out Matters
The modern car market is crowded as hell. Luxury brands like Porsche and Tesla dominate mindshare, and electric upstarts are making disruption their personal brand. Jaguar was stuck in a lane of lukewarm association: luxury-ish, performance-ish, but ultimately not commanding enough ish to compete. They needed to do something radical to reclaim attention.
This rebrand plants a flag: Jaguar isn’t here to linger quietly in the background. Love the change or despise it, the sheer volume of reaction shows one critical fact—Jaguar is back in the conversation. And for a brand that was fading into irrelevance, being talked about again is invaluable.
Cost-sumers vs. Customers
Here’s a hard truth marketers and brand owners often forget: most of the loudest voices online aren’t actual customers. They’re cost-sumers—people who cost you time, resources, and emotional energy without contributing a dime to your bottom line. These are the people loudly tearing apart Jaguar’s new look without ever intending to step foot in a dealership or open their wallets.
Brands that chase approval from cost-sumers are doomed to dilute their identity and focus on the wrong metrics. The purpose of this rebrand isn’t to pacify Twitter branding enthusiasts; it’s to reignite interest in actual potential buyers. People in the market for a $100,000 electric luxury vehicle aren’t rage-posting about font kerning—they’re evaluating how this aligns with their lifestyle, aspirations, and future purchases.
This is why brands need to adopt selective hearing. The real measure of success is whether Jaguar can now attract modern luxury buyers who might have otherwise dismissed them.
The Real Critics: Branding People
It’s worth noting that much of the backlash is coming from branding professionals. Why? Because Jaguar broke an unspoken rule: don’t mess with the playbook. Many in the design and branding community love to shout “disruption” but cling to convention when it actually happens. The same people who roasted Gap for their logo swap or ridiculed Tropicana for reimagining their packaging are likely leading the Jaguar backlash.
What these critics miss is that sometimes different works. Gap abandoned their logo refresh in fear, but Tropicana recovered from initial backlash to remain one of the most recognizable OJ brands globally. Change takes time to settle, and public opinion is often a knee-jerk reaction driven by nostalgia and resistance. Jaguar’s job isn’t to win over designers; it’s to sell a vision of luxury, performance, and exclusivity.
Rebrands Are More Than Logos
Let’s zoom out: a logo is not a brand. The rebrand isn’t just about Jaguar’s new emblem or typeface; it’s a shift in how the company positions itself for the future. It signals a focus on modern luxury, electrification, and a younger, affluent demographic who care about sustainability and aesthetics over tradition.
Will it work? That depends on whether Jaguar follows through. Rebranding isn’t magic—it’s a promise. If the cars, customer experience, and marketing campaigns fail to deliver, the critics will be right. But if Jaguar uses this rebrand as a foundation for meaningful change, they’ll prove that the haters are just noise.
Stop Freaking Out. Start Watching.
To everyone freaking out about the rebrand: chill. This isn’t the end of Jaguar; it’s the start of something new. Whether that something is a roaring comeback or a quiet whimper will take time to see. But at least Jaguar is taking a chance, and for a brand that was teetering on the edge of irrelevance, that’s a hell of a lot better than standing still.
Critics might say this is the death of the brand, but I see it differently. It’s the rebirth of a brand willing to take a stand, turn heads, and claw its way back into the conversation. And that, my friends, is exactly what Jaguar needed to do.
Innovation Strategist, specializing in how technologies including Generative AI are being used to assist professionals in the market research and creative content industries.
1 天前It's been the first time I've heard people even talking about Jaguar, besides how cool it would be to have an original E-Type in my driveway. Logo could have been worse, maybe a Papyrus font.
Managing Director, Canada at The Golin Group
2 天前It’s gotten us all talking and debating. Who cares what the ad looks like, it’s part of cultural conversation that is polarizing and disruptive. I say it’s a win. Particularly if that was the intent.
Life coach/ADHD thought leader, helping professionals feel confident, calm anxiety and overwhelm. ??Let's slay those dragons together.?? Expertise: ADHD & neurodiversity, marketing, writing & editing
3 天前You nailed it right here: "Love the change or despise it, the sheer volume of reaction shows one critical fact—Jaguar is back in the conversation. And for a brand that was fading into irrelevance, being talked about again is invaluable."
Veteran PR Pro | CEO of Propheta Communications | Experts in Startup, B2B & B2C Public Relations | Educator
1 周This reminds me of when Burger King rebranded about twenty years ago. People who never step foot in a fast food establishment lost their minds and bemoaned the "end of classic design."
Chief Coffee Drinker | Global Travel & Experiences Concierge (Powered by Fora: Virtuoso Agency) | Subscribe to Travel Plans for Busy People | TEDx Speaker
1 周Saul Colt - you laid it out pretty clear right here: "A legacy brand being “forgettable” is way more dangerous than a controversial logo."