Yield Curve Red Alert and the Flight to Quality
Source: Bloomberg and Research Affiliates, LLC

Yield Curve Red Alert and the Flight to Quality

Longer-term Treasury yields have plummeted in recent days. Today, the 2-year/10-year yield curve briefly inverted – yet another confirmatory signal of the recession red alert I issued on June 30. What part of the curve is the most relevant? What is the role of flight-to-quality behavior? Is what is happening internationally consistent with what is happening in the US? Is this a self-fulfilling prophecy? I try to answer these questions.

Today the spread between the 10-year and 2-year Treasuries dipped into negative territory, making news as the first inversion in this part of the yield curve since 2007. What does this mean?

Harvey: An inverted yield curve is the unusual situation in which short-term rates are higher than long-term rates. This is almost always a harbinger of bad news. In my 1986 dissertation, I studied the 10-year minus 3-month yield curve as well as the 5-year minus 3-month curve. I found that inversions preceded the four recessions that I studied. Since, the publication of my dissertation, there have been three yield curve inversions – each one preceding a recession, including the global financial crisis. On June 30, 2019, I issued a recession red alert because my measures of the yield curve were inverted, on average, over the second quarter. The Federal Reserve, however, likes to look at another piece of the yield curve, the 10-year minus 2-year. This piece of the yield curve has not inverted – until today. I prefer my measure of anchoring with the 3-month Treasury bill because 1) it is a truer “short” rate than the 2-year, and the yield curve is most appropriately defined as long-term minus short-term; 2) GDP is measured over quarters (three-month intervals); and 3) my yield-curve measure has a long track record of success. Nevertheless, the fact that the Fed’s preferred indicator inverted today is strongly confirmatory to the recession red alert I issued in June.

Is flight to quality playing a role?

Harvey: Yes. Indeed, the economic foundations of the yield curve’s predicting recessions is tightly linked to the so-called flight to quality. The safest assets in the world are US Treasuries. The safest asset in the world is the bellwether US 10-year Treasury bond. When risk increases in the US or in the rest of the world, investors pour into the 10-year bond. This drives the price of the bond up and its yield down. This flattens or inverts the yield curve. It is also possible that investors are liquidating shorter-maturity bonds to invest in the 10-year. This adds further pressure to invert. The bottom line is that the plunging 10-year yield is consistent with investors hedging. It is a sign they want some protection from an expected economic slowdown.

Is this just an unusual situation in the US or does it cover a broader number of countries?

Harvey: This goes well beyond the US for a number of reasons. First, the US is the most important economy in the world. If the US goes into a recession, it is bad for every country that does business with the US. Some countries, like Canada, are dramatically impacted. Second, there are many economic warning signs consistent with a slowdown in other important economies. The UK recently printed negative GDP growth. There are significant concerns that Germany may be going into recession. Indeed, the yield on the 10-year German bund is ?0.65%. The yield on the German 30-year bund is also below zero. A Danish bank is offering negative interest rate mortgages. None of this is “normal.” The economic risk is grave – not just in the US, but also in many developed markets. 

No alt text provided for this image

Source: Bloomberg and Research Affiliates, LLC.

Do you believe the inverted yield curve will cause a recession?

Harvey: The original theory in my dissertation does not say that the yield curve “causes” recessions. Various economic factors lead investors to become nervous about the economy, and this nervousness is reflected in the yield curve, often as a flight to quality. For example, the rise of the anti-trade (anti-growth) policies both in the US and in Europe (Brexit) are playing an important role today. The yield curve reflects investors’ beliefs about economic risks. That said, I believe this time may be different. The yield curve is constantly in the news. The number of internet searches for “yield curve” has spiked, raising the possibility of a self-fulfilling prophesy. That is, the awareness that a yield curve inversion has preceded each of the last seven recessions causes people to change their behavior. It might be a CEO cancelling a planned business expansion because increased borrowing would put the company at risk in a recession. It might be consumers holding off on big ticket purchases to get their credit card fully paid off. These actions reduce economic growth, but why shouldn’t businesses and consumers use the information in the yield curve for their planning? I believe it is better that we give up some short-term growth in order to moderate the impact of an economic slowdown. In other words, yes, a CEO’s decision might lead to slower growth and lower profitability in the short term. That is better, however, than ignoring the signal and borrowing a lot, only to go out of business if a recession occurs. No one wants another global financial crisis recession. Soft landings are much preferred.

Source: Google. Prepared by Research Affiliates, LLC.

Source: Google. Prepared by Research Affiliates, LLC.

Thank you Professor Harvey for your articles. I was wondering if you could comment on the Morgan Stanley adjusted yield curve. They say their curve inverted as long ago as last year. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-29/yield-curve-collapse-continues-morgan-stanley-its-much-worse-you-think

回复
Iain Hamilton

SquarePeg Advisory - Auckland, NZ

5 年

Personally I think far too much of the discussion at present is focused on whether we have a recession or not. I think this misses the entire point of watching for yield curve flattening and inversion. The point of having the yield curve on my dash board has always been as an indication of, firstly economic growth and secondly risk off, basically investors seeking protection in the UST10yr. At this time the issue for me as an investment manager, is that a slowing economy leads to changes in earnings expectations, and earnings growth expectations. When slowing earnings growth meets and overvalued market, pain normally ensues. Therefore simplistically I don’t care about whether we have a recession or not. I do very much care that we are seeing numerous warnings of a slowing economy, in almost every corner of the world.? Earnings expectations are changing, and by almost every measure I deem to be important, the world’s biggest market is expensive. The sheer size of the long UST10yr risk positioning is also indicating that some smart money is taking some risk off the table. Don’t be a hero this time is not different.

Jerry Hsiang

Head of Finance @ Royal

5 年

Given the mainstreaming of yield curve inversion, one can perhaps logically argue it could either lead to reflexivity in action i.e. cause the behavior it supposedly predicts, or a reflection of goodhart's law i.e. its lost its predictive powers since everyone is watching it. The depth of the economic adjustments or “reallocation” of resources could be INVERSELY correlated with how often the overall market talks about it as the more often someone talks about it over a medium-term duration, and at least in theory, the market participants will slowly shift their allocations, thereby, engineering a softer landing. Though H2O AM LLP recent H2O illiquidity crunch on their debt holding in June 2019 is perhaps worth the study (PS: no better name than “H2O” fund going through illiquidity situations). https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/f5f9ff74-9647-11e9-8cfb-30c211dcd229

回复
Patrick Rooney

Power, gas, & environmentals trading | Nodal Exchange

5 年

Is a yield curve inversion in a rate cut cycle as meaningful as an inversion following rate hikes? As the Fed is already cutting rates it seems as through we’re already tamping out the fire by throwing money at it. When rates are rising, and money is being taken out of circulation, a yield curve inversion would certainly state we’ve gone too far and a recession is coming. Not the same when we’ve already begun to cut rates. Perhaps we need to increase the pace cut the ball is in motion.

In lights of the heralds brought about by this inversion, I wonder about your take on whether we, as a collective economy, are prepared to absorb the impending shock given better implementation of risk dispersion measures, which were emphasized long ago by former FED's Alan Greenspan, and in which the 2008 crisis were ascribed predominantly to the concentrated institutional risk, and the failer to contain risk in the run-up? After all, I'm assuming that?DFAST and CCAR are designed with this goal in mind. Thank you for all your insightful work Prof. Harvey

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了