Yann LeCun on the Limits of LLMs
?? Leonard Scheidel
6800+ Follower | Graphic Design Student | Freelance Web Designer | Generative AI Expert & Tech Enthusiast
Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta and a prominent figure in artificial intelligence, has been vocal about the limitations of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and LLaMA. Despite their impressive performance on various tasks, LeCun argues that LLMs lack key capabilities necessary for achieving true intelligence, such as the ability to reason, plan, and understand the physical world through sensory input and interaction.
Rule Inference Issues
LLMs can infer rules from data but often struggle to apply them correctly, leading to outputs that diverge from human reasoning. They tend to be verbose and fail to focus on fundamental patterns for generalization. Moreover, LLMs exhibit poor consistency rates in multi-step reasoning tasks, struggling with hypothetical consistency (predicting outputs in other contexts) and compositional consistency (consistency of final outputs when intermediate steps are replaced with the model's outputs).
Autoregressive Architecture Limitations
LeCun believes that the autoregressive nature of LLMs, which predict the next word based on previous ones, fundamentally limits their ability to achieve true intelligence. He advocates for a Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) as a more promising approach towards AGI. LeCun also criticizes the current focus on text-based learning, arguing for the need to observe and interact with the physical world to build comprehensive world models essential for planning and reasoning
领英推荐
Sensory Input Importance
LeCun emphasizes the importance of sensory input and interaction with the physical world for developing true intelligence. He points out that LLMs, trained on vast amounts of text data, lack the ability to reason, plan, and understand the world the way humans and animals do. LeCun suggests that future AI systems need to:
Open-Source AI Advocacy
LeCun advocates for open-sourcing AI development to prevent monopolies and ensure diverse inputs, especially in multilingual contexts. He believes that open-source models can incorporate guardrails to ensure safety and non-toxicity while allowing for customization according to different value systems LeCun argues that the risk of slowing AI development is much greater than the risk of disseminating it and that freedom and diversity in AI are as vital as having an independent press.
Follow us:
Visit our partner page: MSI Partners ??
#LLMs #Ai #LeCun #Meta