XR Unleashed: A Guide to Achieving Success in Extended Reality Implementations
Bob Chiappetta, PMP, SA
Global Technology Innovation Leader | Integrations and Emerging Technology Business Partner | Artificial Intelligence
In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, Extended Reality (XR) holds immense promise for revolutionizing industries, transforming customer experiences, and enhancing internal operations. XR encompasses augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR), and its potential is only limited by how well it's harnessed. However, amidst the excitement lies a sobering reality: many XR implementations fall short of their intended goals. In this blog post, we're delving into several reasons why XR Implementations fail and to empower organizations with insights for successful XR integration.
Here are the common obstacles that companies often encounter when entering the Extended Reality ecosystem, presented in no specific sequence:
?
1. Lack of Sponsor or Stakeholder Support
A primary stumbling block in XR implementation lies in the absence of sufficient support from sponsors or stakeholders. Executive sponsorship emerges as a vital factor, as relegating the implementation to a "pet project" or an incidental endeavor may result in it being perceived as lacking seriousness by users. To counteract this, sponsors must possess a comprehensive grasp of the project's goals and comprehend how the technology harmonizes with the broader business or project objectives. Equally important is the necessity for sponsors to pinpoint precise use cases and sought-after outcomes before committing resources to XR implementation. By establishing a strong foundation of support and clear alignment with organizational goals, XR projects stand a greater chance of triumphing over this challenge.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Strong executive sponsorship is crucial for a successful XR implementation. Executive sponsors must understand XR's objectives, alignment with business goals, and specific use cases to ensure commitment and organizational buy-in.
2. No Buy-In from Business Users or IT Entities
Resistance to change often stems from a lack of user buy-in. Some employees may fear the complexity of new technology, leading to resistance or even job insecurity. User comfort and satisfaction are paramount. Designing intuitive interfaces, addressing concerns, and providing comprehensive training help cultivate a culture of innovation and openness to XR technology.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Prioritize user comfort and satisfaction to overcome resistance to change. Design intuitive interfaces, address concerns openly, and provide comprehensive training to foster a culture of innovation and openness to XR technology.
3. No Clear ROI or Value Proposition
One of the most significant hurdles to overcome in XR implementation is demonstrating a clear Return on Investment (ROI). XR can be costly due to hardware, software, content creation, and training expenses. Articulating a compelling value proposition that considers both costs and benefits is crucial for garnering support from stakeholders and ensuring long-term financial sustainability.
Can be an expensive solution due to the cost of hardware, software development, content creation, and training. If the return on investment (ROI) is not well-defined or achievable, the project might be deemed financially unsustainable.
Clear value proposition must be communicated with all stakeholders.
In the realm of XR implementation, a substantial challenge lies in establishing a clear Return on Investment (ROI). The expenses associated with XR, encompassing hardware, software, content creation, and training, can be considerable. The absence of a compelling value proposition that carefully balances costs and benefits can undermine stakeholder buy-in and jeopardize the project's financial viability.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: ?Clearly articulate the ROI and value proposition of XR implementations to garner support. Balancing costs, benefits, and long-term financial sustainability is essential for stakeholder engagement and project success.
4. IT and Business Misalignment
An obstacle that frequently impedes XR success revolves around the discord between business and IT decision-making. Achieving alignment in this area is essential. Business leaders should assume the mantle of steering business decisions, while IT should concentrate on technology-related matters. This division of responsibilities is a safeguard against costly errors and ensures that technological advancements harmonize with overarching strategic business goals.
It is important to emphasize that business decisions should be made by business leaders, not by the IT department. Similarly, the IT department should focus on technology and not make business decisions. This separation of duties is especially critical given that the business side ultimately owns and is responsible for the system. IT can be an advisor but not the owner of a business system.
(One client bought 25 XR devices without informing IT.?These devices collected dust and were never used because the devices had a security issue and could not be deployed on their network. QA also refused to sign off.?This was a $100K mistake for a company whose profit margin was low to begin with.)
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Maintain a clear separation between business and IT decisions. Ensure that technology advancements align with strategic business objectives, preventing costly mistakes and ensuring successful XR integration.
5. Hasty Device Procurement
Purchasing XR devices without a thorough understanding of use cases can lead to implementation failure. Relying on vendor hype or conducting superficial research can result in solutions that lack long-term support or scalability. Thoughtful research, vendor evaluations, and understanding the long-term roadmap are essential for sustainable XR implementations.
In today’s world, it is easy to run a web search on XR technology.?This will result in a large array of vendors stating that their application or solution is what’s needed.?The list of companies continues to grow.?The risk is that majority of these vendors will not be around to support the client in later years or they are unable to scale the solution.
New technology hype - media and industry hype can lead to disappointment if the actual capabilities of the XR technology do not match the perceived potential.
Vendor sales pitch can be persuasive for the inexperienced.
Rushed XR device procurement without a comprehensive grasp of potential use cases poses a significant risk to implementation success. Depending on vendor enthusiasm or conducting superficial research can yield solutions that lack long-term viability or scalability. Meticulous research, vendor evaluations, and a profound understanding of the technology's long-term trajectory are indispensable for establishing sustainable XR implementations.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Thoughtful research and vendor evaluations are essential before purchasing XR devices. Avoid being swayed by vendor hype and focus on long-term support, scalability, and alignment with your organization's roadmap
6. Platform Predicaments
The platform on which an XR system resides is pivotal for its success. Ideally, the solution should integrate seamlessly with the company's current platform to reduce additional training and support costs. This integration ensures a cohesive user experience and streamlines IT management.?The various decisions are:
Use Current or Vendor Platform?
Seamless Integrations to Other Systems:
Adequate Training and Ongoing Support:
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: The choice of a platform should prioritize seamless integration, reducing training and support costs while delivering a unified user experience and streamlined IT management.
7. Licenses and Subscriptions Oversights
The hidden costs of recurring licensing fees can undermine XR projects if not considered during budgeting. These fees are often underestimated, leading to budget overruns. Accounting for ongoing licensing expenses from the start is vital to prevent financial setbacks down the line.
When proposing an XR system, the upfront physical costs like hardware and software often get the most visibility. However, the ongoing licensing fees are a hidden cost that can derail adoption if overlooked.?For example, many XR solutions require per-user, per-device, or site-wide licenses. These recurring subscription fees are often underestimated or omitted entirely during budgeting.
There is frequently an assumption that once the initial XR equipment purchases are made, the system can be used freely. In reality, licensing is required to access content libraries, multiplayer functionality, or simply to activate headsets.
Without accounting for these recurring licensing expenses, the total cost of an XR rollout can balloon quickly. Lack of budget can then force suspension of the project to avoid unplanned costs.
Considering license requirements early when evaluating XR options prevents nasty surprises later. Building in licensing budgets from the start ensures this invisible cost doesn't undermine the initiative down the road. Anticipating this need safeguards the long-term viability of an XR investment.
Recommendation:
Acknowledge Hidden Licensing Costs:
领英推荐
Comprehensive Budgeting:
Types of Licensing Fees:
Beyond Initial Purchases:
Balancing Total Costs:
Early License Consideration:
Incorporate Licensing Budgets:
Key Takeaway: Account for recurring licensing fees when budgeting for XR implementation. Factor in ongoing costs to prevent budget overruns and ensure the sustainability of your XR project.
8. Short-Sighted Solutions
Approaching XR as a one-time solution for a specific problem neglects its broader potential. XR should be part of a comprehensive, long-term strategy that accounts for technological evolution and changing organizational needs. Failing to plan for growth and evolution can lead to technology obsolescence and user dissatisfaction.
XR solutions should align with long-term business objectives and accommodate future growth. Shortsighted systems risk fast irrelevance.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Incorporate XR into a comprehensive, long-term strategy. Plan for technological evolution and changing organizational needs to avoid obsolescence and user dissatisfaction.
9. Lack of Proof of Concept (PoC) or Proof of Value (PoV)
Investing time and resources into a Proof of Concept (PoC) or Proof of Value (PoV) is a valuable yet often overlooked step due to perceived constraints. However, a pilot program that engages users in shaping the development of the XR system yields rapid results and user feedback, enabling timely adjustments that align with real-world needs. This aspect is frequently underestimated due to concerns regarding time, money, and resources. Nonetheless, the investment in a pilot program is highly recommended, particularly given the contemporary Agile approach. Such an approach effectively involves clients and users in system refinement, yielding quicker results compared to traditional change request methodologies. This underscores the significance of the investment of time and resources in a PoC or PoV, which often remains in the shadows despite its pivotal role in XR implementation.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Invest in PoCs or PoVs to involve users in shaping the XR system's development. Agile methodologies enable rapid adjustments based on real-world needs and user feedback.
?
10. Connectivity Challenges
For XR to thrive, stable and reliable network accessibility is non-negotiable. Especially in scenarios involving connected or field workers, network reliability is critical. Implementing a separate network for XR devices can safeguard other critical systems from potential disruptions.
The cornerstone of XR's success rests upon the bedrock of stable and dependable network accessibility. This tenet holds especially true in scenarios involving connected or field workers, where the reliability of the network becomes paramount. In light of this, considering a separate network dedicated to XR devices emerges as a strategic move to shield critical systems from potential disruptions.
Network accessibility:
If the technology isn't easily accessible, stable, reliable, and compatible with the intended devices, it can lead to implementation failure.
More use cases are focused on the connected worker or field worker.
Stand alone or join existing network:
To minimize the risk of devices sharing the network with critical systems, a separate network would segregate the devices and XR applications.?They can later be integrated once the system has proven to be safe and reliable.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Ensure stable and reliable network accessibility, particularly for connected or field worker scenarios. Implementing a separate network can protect critical systems from potential disruptions.
11. Overlooking Critical Internal Groups
Neglecting involvement from groups such as security, procurement, and quality assurance can lead to risks and inefficiencies. Ensuring a comprehensive risk assessment, robust procurement process, and compliance with regulations are vital for a secure and effective XR implementation.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Involve security, procurement, and quality assurance groups from the start. Comprehensive risk assessment, secure procurement, and compliance ensure a secure and effective XR implementation.
?
12. Limited Integration with Existing Systems
XR solutions must seamlessly integrate with existing workflows and systems to maximize adoption. Compatibility challenges with legacy systems can hinder user acceptance and lead to frustration.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Seamless integration with existing workflows enhances XR adoption. Address compatibility challenges to provide a cohesive user experience and promote user acceptance.
13. Lack of Rollout and Communication Plans
The absence of well-structured rollout plans and effective communication strategies can cast a shadow over the success of XR implementation. User engagement, support, and expectation-setting emerge as indispensable elements for facilitating a seamless transition. To foster a positive user experience, a clear roadmap with defined timelines, accessible training resources, and responsive technical support are imperative.
Having a defined project methodology is critical. XR systems often require rapid iterations and updates to hold users' interest. Quality assurance processes should be integrated into development cycles to catch issues pre-launch.
For large user rollouts, identifying a cross-functional pilot group is key. This allows testing across different use cases to uncover adoption challenges. Larger launches without staged rollouts risk disengagement if users encounter too many issues initially.
Clear communication about timelines, training resources, and technical support is essential. Users need to know what to expect with the change. Lack of communication around an AR/VR launch can breed confusion, frustration, and resistance.
Proper rollout planning and communication enables users to become advocates rather than opponents. It ensures the maximized engagement and benefit an AR/VR system can offer if deployed thoughtfully.
Recommendation:
Key Takeaway: Clear rollout plans and communication are essential for a successful XR implementation. Engage users, provide support, and set expectations to ensure a smooth transition and positive user experience.
Final thought...
The path to successful XR implementation requires strategic planning, organizational alignment, user-centered design, and comprehensive support. By addressing these top reasons for XR implementation failure, organizations can navigate challenges and maximize the benefits of XR technology. Remember, the journey towards effective XR integration demands deliberate actions, collaborative efforts, and a commitment to fostering innovation within your organization.
Executive Leadership | Big Data, AI/ML & Analytics | Emerging Technologies | Ex-Microsoft
1 年Thoughtful insights, and spot on analysis
Sr. IT Recruiter ● Job Change Coach to IT Leaders ● IT Resume & Interview Services ● Author, "IT Resume Mastery"
1 年Great post Bob! IT leaders charged with implementing new, transformational technology of ANY type could adapt this detailed approach to their own projects. Thanks for sharing!