Is XPO Logistics Biting More Than It Can Chew?
Adrian Gonzalez
President, Adelante SCM (Talking Logistics, Indago, & LL4T1DCure Team)
It's only been a couple of weeks since I wrote that convergence in the 3PL industry is accelerating, pointing to the number of large M&A deals announced in recent weeks, including UPS buying Coyote Logistics and Geodis Group acquiring Ozburn-Hessey Logistics. Well, another blockbuster deal was announced this week: XPO Logistics is acquiring Con-way for approximately $3 billion. Here are some comments from Bradley Jacobs, chairman and chief executive officer of XPO Logistics, from the press release:
"Our opportunistic acquisition of Con-way will make XPO the second largest provider of less-than-truckload transportation in North America, a $35 billion market. LTL is a non-commoditized, high-value-add business that's used by nearly all of our customers. Con-way is a premier platform that we will run with a fresh set of eyes as part of our broader offering. Importantly, we'll gain strategic ownership of assets that will benefit our company and our customers during periods of tight capacity.
"Another crown jewel in this transaction is Con-way's subsidiary, Menlo Logistics, an asset-light top 30 global contract logistics provider with additional lines of business in freight brokerage and managed transportation. Menlo serves blue chip contract logistics customers in verticals such as high tech, healthcare and retail, which complement the verticals we serve at XPO."
XPO has barely started chewing its $3.5 billion acquisition of Norbert Dentressangle SA from earlier this year, and it has now taken another big bite. Just like a kid taking too many bites from a large hamburger without chewing, will XPO be able to swallow and digest these big acquisitions or will it cough them up?
Based on XPO's share price (down 40% from its May 2015 high, including an 11% drop on Thursday) and news that Moody’s Investor Service might downgrade the company’s credit rating (which is already classified as high risk), it seems like investors are concerned not only about the size and pace of these large acquisitions, but also in the company's strategy shift from an asset-light model to an "asset heavier" one.
I believe the shift in strategy is correct, if executed well. As I argued back in April 2013 in In Logistics, Somebody Has to Own the Assets, it's time for investors to stop viewing 3PLs with assets like "an overweight runner, wearing a lead track suit and cement sneakers, in a field of sprinters" and embrace a better definition of an asset: "something useful in an effort to foil or defeat an enemy."
But the roll-up strategy XPO and other 3PLs are taking today is similar to what has occurred in the software industry, and the lessons learned are clear. While the financial and strategic justifications look pretty on paper, the ugliness shows up when trying to integrate IT systems, cross-train sales people, and in creating a unified and positive company culture, especially across geographic regions. The resignation last week of Hervé Montjotin, Norbert's former CEO who was serving as chief executive officer of XPO's European business and president of the parent company, only complicates matters.
Another lessoned learned is that most customers don't want to put all of their logistics eggs in one basket — whether it's a single software vendor or 3PL. And while there are advantages to providing customers with a broad solution footprint and value proposition, the reality is that no single software vendor or 3PL is best-in-class across the board, which is why best-of-breed software vendors, for example, still exist and compete effectively with the giants.
Several years ago, I conducted a think tank session with supply chain and logistics executives focused on logistics outsourcing, and one of the key takeaways was summed up perfectly by this comment: "My best 3PL in the United States is my worst one in Europe," due in large part to differences in on-the-ground domain expertise, talent (both frontline and management), and IT capabilities by country, which is why companies often opt to work with different providers in different countries.
All that said, XPO Logistics is following my advice to be bold and different. Here in Boston, fans of the New England Patriots have a saying: "In Bill we trust," meaning that we trust Bill Belichick, the head coach of the team, knows what he's doing when he makes decisions we don't always understand or agree with. The question for investors and customers of XPO Logistics moving forward is “In Bradley Jacobs we trust?” Time will tell.
Ad Hoc Logistics LLC, Int'l Logistics Consultant/Licensed Customs Broker
9 年Interesting article. As Adrian points out the industry is consolidating and some 3PL's are shifting from asset light to asset heavier. Clients would be justified in questioning their 3PL's objectivity in selection of transportation services where the 3PL owns carriers. If the 3PL is to truly manage the outsourced logistics functions there needs to be a firewall between consulting and LTL services.
Transportation & Logistics Manager 10+ Years of Experience Improving Service Levels and Reducing Freight Costs
9 年I enjoyed your summary Adrian. General consensus at the FTR conference in Indianapolis this week has been wait and see. I think it's a question mark for everyone at this point.
Operations Manager at Artistic Tile
9 年This is a very interesting perspective and one that I have been thinking about. Our logistics model is diversified to avoid "having all your eggs in one basket". Both XPO and Con-Way are part of our existing portfolio. While I can relate to the idea of expanding one's offerings, being "everything to everyone" through combined cultures and corporate strategies, may dilute rather than strengthen, the core. I guess time will tell.