Writers vs. ChatGPT
Image generated with much trial and error (on my part) by MidJourney.

Writers vs. ChatGPT

Recently, I've had a lot of friends debate the looming threat of advanced #AI Chatbots such as ChatGPT, Jasper, Microsoft's ChatGPT, and whatever the tech giants throw at us next in their efforts to manipulate the human race.

I say that only partially joking, as I am often envious of my friends still working in tech, but let me return to the conversation at hand.

Will #artists be made redundant as artificial wordsmiths take center stage?


As a storyteller, let me paint you a picture. Imagine a world where machines create all our literature, where every book, every article, and every script is generated by an algorithm... Ugh, even as I write that, I'm bored to tears. The idea of machines writing every piece of literature is as ominous, imaginary, and boring as politicians magically conjuring up 1500-page bills that they hope nobody will ever read. They intentionally don't consider the emotional impact of the words they commit to the page because they don't want humans to read it.

?Art is not just about the transmission of information but about the emotional connection it creates with its audience. It's about capturing the human experience in all its complexities and presenting it in a way that resonates with people deeply and meaningfully. This is something that I believe machines can never "completely" replicate.


As programs like ChatGPT grows more advanced, it's important to recognize the unique role that writers play in the creative process. Writers are #artists. Writers are #storytellers. They are the creators who can transform raw data into something that moves people (for better or worse). Writers are able to capture the nuances of human emotions, the subtleties of interpersonal relationships, and the complexities of the human experience. (Mix this with a dash of procrastination, and you have a long overdue article about writers vs. ChatGPT).

My argument AGAINST writers is that writers are inherently lazy. Writers procrastinate. Writers have lives outside their "art," with jobs, and depression, and babies, and videogames, and any number of excuses that will forever and always make them less efficient than the machines they rail against.

Rather than seeing ChatGPT as a threat, they can view it as a tool to enhance their creativity. #ChatGPT can generate ideas to help writers overcome writer's block, outline their work, and speed up the research process. It can even be used as a sounding board, a way for writers to test out their ideas and get feedback.


Ultimately, the role of the #writer is irreplaceable. It's not just about the words on the page but the emotional impact those words deliver to their reader. It's about creating something that resonates with people on a deeper level and connects with them.

I say we should embrace #technology. Future generations will grow up with it and use it to their advantage. And the artists will recognize ways to use it to enhance human creativity and the emotional impact of their art.

No alt text provided for this image
The runner-up for my article image, but I couldn't get a human buried beneath the piles of paper.

(Full disclosure because of dumb integrity, but I outlined this article in Chat GPT because I procrastinate and I wanted to make a point. Ultimately, I changed everything, but the artificial bones are here somewhere.)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mitch Bechtold的更多文章

  • A Love Letter to Video Gaming

    A Love Letter to Video Gaming

    Prologue: In the world of gaming, where exhilarating adventures await, a console's demise can be a devastating blow to…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了