Would You Buy Yahoo For $4.8 Billion? How 'Bout $3.8 Billion?

Would You Buy Yahoo For $4.8 Billion? How 'Bout $3.8 Billion?

When Verizon agreed to purchase Yahoo for $4.8 billion, it was the right price. Not because Yahoo was worth $4.8 billion, simply because it was the price Verizon was willing to pay. Valuations are all smoke and mirrors until someone is willing to write you a check. That is the moment (the only moment) you know the true value of anything.

Then the thinkable happened. Yahoo disclosed that it had a years-old security breach that just happened to be the biggest in history. We found out that the company had set up special software to spy on all incoming emails “for national security reasons,” and then, the cherry on the cake of Verizon’s day, Marissa Mayer’s alleged secret campaign to purge the company of its male employees. Thinkable? Don’t I mean “unthinkable?” Nope. Yahoo is run by a person who should have been kicked upstairs (where she could do no harm) years ago. But I digress.

In the wake of the continuing disaster that is Yahoo, Verizon is asking for a small discount (about a billion dollars) off the agreed-upon purchase price. Everyone understands why. Yahoo covered up a super-sized hack that exposed account information for over 500 million Yahoo users for over two years, then tried to act like it was impossible to defend against because it was perpetrated by state actors (which is questionable; most security experts think this was done by hackers-for-hire, not a nefarious nation-state). Considering Yahoo’s mismanagement, Verizon should probably be asking for $2 billion off! But that’s not the point.

Even with everything we’ve just listed. Even with Marissa Mayer on track to secure her place as one of the worst CEOs in CEO history, Yahoo still has a value to Verizon.

Successful Big Companies Know What They Can’t Do

While there are reports that Tim Armstrong is privately very concerned about the Verizon/AOL/Yahoo integration and additional “off the record” sources saying that Yahoo technology cannot be integrated with AOL technology in any meaningful way, publicly, Tim is quoted as saying, “I think people knew the businesses were similar, but I think it’s more similar. I think what I mean by that is that Yahoo is going through a turnaround and a lot of that work and strategy is similar to what AOL did when we were turning around the company. So I think there’s a lot of opportunity there for us to speed up on both sides.”

There may be opportunity. But to realize the potential being publicly stated, a significant number of extremely difficult technical and cultural decisions are going to have to be made. That said, there is an overwhelming reason for Verizon to complete this acquisition: they could never build any of this themselves. Never.

Verizon has an additional aspiration. It wants to “own” 2 billion uniques by 2020 (which would make it number three, behind Google and Facebook). To accomplish this, Verizon will need to acquire them. They cannot be organically generated.

Can VZ craft a strategy that will properly position a combined Verizon/AOL/Yahoo to achieve its business goals? Are Yahoo’s uniques worth owning? Is there a loyal core community of Yahoo users? If VZ buys them, will they really belong to VZ?

Since we’re asking questions, “What exactly is Yahoo?” Well, if one can believe what one reads in the news, Verizon knows exactly what Yahoo is. They’re just discussing price.

About Shelly Palmer

Named one of LinkedIn’s Top 10 Voices in TechnologyShelly Palmer is CEO ofThe Palmer Group, a strategic advisory, technology solutions and business development practice focused at the nexus of media and marketing with a special emphasis on augmented intelligence and data-driven decision-making. He is Fox 5 New York's on-air tech and digital media expert and a regular commentator on CNBC and CNN. Follow @shellypalmer or visit shellypalmer.com or subscribe to our daily email https://ow.ly/WsHcb

Erik McGrath

pupil at local luna

6 年

Nikki call me asap

回复
Nikki Blau

Software Design Engineer at Facebook

7 年

Not even four dollars could machine wash that stain on It.

Justin Henry

Media Strategy | Business Development | Finance

8 年

This deal, even at $2B is a mistake that will haunt AOL and Verizon for years and years. Yahoo will die on its own. AOL should put 2B into its own tech and platform, which it drastically needs. AT&T and Time Warner are busy with other deals. Comcast doesn't need it. The only reason I see this deal being good for Verizon share holders is that Yahoo traffic will continue to drive demand for bandwith by Verizon subs. But for how long and at what value. Verizon should just let this one go.

回复
Robin S.

Co-Founder @syncbp.com

8 年

See what Verizon is trying to get the price down? Citing the HAACK as a reason? lol

回复
Ovais Ahmed

Driving Business Growth through Data Analysis & Business Intelligence,| Data Visualization Expert | Tableau, Power BI & Business Intelligence Analyst | Ex-IBEX | Ex-Equinix

8 年

Yahoo Inc. has become a fractured-bone horse but still it can run fast as your imagination. If Yahoo might be bought by Facebook so it can sustain in growth. Because it is not joking that millions of users of Yahoo currently active users in Facebook. Secure the Crowd of users who are the ladder of success of social networking in business all the time. If Yahoo bidding itself more than $4.8 billion for sell out their all assets so I think it is better chance to catch a golden fish. Don't let further delay to think !

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Shelly Palmer的更多文章

  • The Famous “P&G Memo”

    The Famous “P&G Memo”

    Want to be a better strategic thinker? For most businesspeople, the time-tested P&G (Procter & Gamble) Memo is a great…

    7 条评论
  • Uber and Lyft Are Doomed

    Uber and Lyft Are Doomed

    Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are about to dramatically change the world of on-demand car services. Viewed through that…

    29 条评论
  • I Don’t Have Time for the Truth!

    I Don’t Have Time for the Truth!

    I was checking out my Twitter feed the other day and I came upon a tweet from Richard Dawkins. He is one of my favorite…

    2 条评论
  • You’re Worried about Facial Recognition? WTF?

    You’re Worried about Facial Recognition? WTF?

    In a rare show of bipartisan unity this past Wednesday, Republicans and Democrats on the House Oversight Committee…

    2 条评论
  • What is a Radio Brand?

    What is a Radio Brand?

    Cumulus Media confirmed that New York City’s iconic FM radio station 95.5 PLJ will sign off for the last time on…

    1 条评论
  • A “Duty of Care” for Facebook

    A “Duty of Care” for Facebook

    French regulators have recommended requiring a “duty of care” for big social networks, meaning social networks should…

    3 条评论
  • Digital Transformation Is Seriously Misnamed

    Digital Transformation Is Seriously Misnamed

    Our main business is helping big brands, big media, and big tech with their digital transformation journeys. This is an…

    8 条评论
  • An EPCOT for the 5th Industrial Revolution: Showcasing the Possible

    An EPCOT for the 5th Industrial Revolution: Showcasing the Possible

    In 1877 Thomas Edison invented the phonograph. He liked to demonstrate his device by allowing people to speak into the…

    1 条评论
  • Music by AI – A Warning Label Is Now Required

    Music by AI – A Warning Label Is Now Required

    Last week, The Verge asked the question, “AI is capable of making music, but does that make AI an artist?” Wow, is that…

    6 条评论
  • The Next Great Decoupling: AI Takes Control

    The Next Great Decoupling: AI Takes Control

    Last night I binge-watched the latest three episodes of Star Trek Discovery, which set up the season 2 finale – spoiler…

    210 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了