Would You Abandon a 3-Year Custom-Built Product for No-Code? Here's Why One Company Did

Imagine reading this article and walking away with insights that could save your business thousands of dollars, just as Mochary Method did by leveraging Bubble.io. Migrating from a product built from scratch to a no-code solution is counterintuitive for many, as most businesses move from outdated systems to custom apps. But thanks to Beck Akhmadov's experience, we learn that even with a near-perfect product, no-code can offer a unique advantage. Would you scrap a custom-built product for a no-code solution? Mochary Method did, and here’s what they learned.

Speed Over Perfection

Beck Akhmadov 's experience at Mochary Method prioritizes speed over perfection, a critical factor in their transition to a hybrid solution combining Bubble.io and custom code. By using Bubble for rapid development, they could test features quickly, while more complex elements were handled through custom code. For example, when Bubble’s limitations arose, they built custom plugins or used tools like Cursur to write and integrate code seamlessly. This approach gave them agility without sacrificing control, leveraging both worlds to deliver a more tailored product. In a fast-paced market, delivering quickly often outweighs perfection, making no-code ideal for iterative development

This approach is revealing. In my experience, companies usually seek autonomy, moving toward systems where they aren't reliant on third parties. However, applying the Pareto principle, around 80% of businesses could benefit from the efficiencies of low-code, while only 20% need fully custom solutions. The ability to implement hybrid models will become a growing trend as companies seek tailored, yet efficient, approaches to product development.

The Future of Hybrid Solutions

One key takeaway from Beck Akhmadov’s experience is the power of experimentation. Not every CEO has the resources or flexibility to allow two teams to compete in developing the best product, as Matt Mochary did. But the question remains: What can you experiment with right now, given your current resources? This isn't about adopting no-code blindly; it’s about seeking evidence of its value. Instead of being limited by traditional methods, what steps can you take today to explore no-code and see if it’s the right fit? Why not explore new technologies that could help you move forward today?