The world of AI has a new problem: Very few women

The world of AI has a new problem: Very few women

Julia Kroll’s career in computer science started almost by mistake. 

As a freshman at Carleton College in Northfield, Minn., Kroll, now 24, was set on enrolling in a cognitive science class, but it was full. As a backup, she took an introductory class in computer science. She was hooked. The Madison, Wisc. native shifted her plans from majoring in something like English, to comp-sci.

That decision led her to Amazon in 2017, where she is now a language data engineer working on machine learning for the well-known personal assistant, Alexa.

“I had always been good at science and math in school, but I hadn’t had that exposure to computer science,” she says. “My parents were happy that I wasn’t going to be an English major after all.”

Kroll is among a fast-growing group of professionals across industries who is specializing in artificial intelligence. While working in AI and machine learning is becoming increasingly common, Kroll stands out: Only 22% of AI professionals across the globe are female, compared to 78% who are male, according to LinkedIn data released in the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report.

An AI gender skill gap this expansive has critical implications for both women and society. The number of workers with AI skills grew 190% globally between 2015 and 2017, and for good reason. Six of the 15 fastest-growing jobs of the past year call for these skills and AI specialists are becoming some of the highest paid experts across tech. If the gender gap in this specialty persists, it may widen the existing pay disparities between men and women in this industry and beyond. Meanwhile, experts told LinkedIn that having mostly male teams build AI technology that soon will be run mostly by machines poses serious ethical challenges.

The fear? Tech that’s built solely from the perspective of one gender or ethnic group may ultimately disregard or discount the needs and values of another.

Work hard, or ‘miss this moment’

The gender gap among professionals with AI skills closely matches the gap we see among graduates of college and masters programs with related degrees, says Maria Klawe, the president of Harvey Mudd College. Typically, about 20% of U.S. undergraduate computer science degrees go to women. When you look at domestic PhD programs like statistics and math, roughly 30% of students are female.

The same can’t be said at Harvey Mudd, where more than 50% of computer science graduates are women. Klawe attributes the school’s success to subtle tweaks to their program. A majority of incoming freshman who arrive on campus with advanced computer science skills are male, so Mudd created a section for students who lacked previous experience. The college has also made an effort to emphasize computer science’s potential to make a social impact. This has encouraged more women to apply, Klawe claims.

“We are in this transition time where we either really work hard to make sure that we have a diverse set of people thinking about these skills, or we miss this moment and it’s hard to catch up,” says Klawe.

Creating ‘an armor’

The challenges don’t simply end after graduation, though. Many women who complete their education in AI-related degrees do not pursue careers in the field. The way jobs in machine learning and artificial intelligence are marketed may have something to do with it.

In an analysis of more than 78,000 job listings for software engineers, those referencing “machine intelligence” are by far the most likely to use phrases proven to be masculine in tone such as "exhaustive," "enforcement" and "fearless." In turn, these listings also have the most male applicants, according to Textio, an augmented writing platform that uses AI to surface language patterns that attract or deter people to job descriptions and recruiting emails.

To highlight women who enter AI and machine learning careers and encourage them from leaving, several organizations have launched networking events. Nikita Johnson founded RE.WORK, a London-based events company that convenes academics and experts working in AI, about six years ago. When they first started organizing events, Johnson says about 30% of the 400 to 800 attendees were female. That figure is now closer to 40% for their larger summits and they convene nearly 100 women working in AI a few times a year for smaller dinners. 

For Johnson, it’s critical to shine a light on role models in AI that other women can look up to.

“There are a lot of different female role models working in artificial intelligence. A shift is only going to happen when women that are still in school can see them and think [artificial intelligence] is a valuable opportunity for them.”

Such was the case from an early age for Kieran Snyder, the founder of Textio. The daughter of an engineer who makes radar systems for spaceships and a writer, her parents sat at the intersection of science and language processing. She studied math and linguistics as an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania before earning a PhD in linguistics and cognitive science.

After nearly 10 years at LinkedIn-parent Microsoft in various project manager roles, 44-year-old Snyder set her sights on starting her own AI company.

“The fact that my dad and mom had the expectation that I could do anything I wanted was a pretty big deal…. I think it created an armor for me,” she says.

‘Need the full range of human perspective’

Many members of the AI community are concerned about the ethical implications of building an AI workforce that is predominately male. That’s, in part, why Snyder has been conscious from the beginning of building a diverse team. Half of Textio’s roughly 100 employees are female and 30% identify as Black or Latinx.

Snyder says she’s been successful at building a diverse team because she started early and looked in different places to find talent.

“If you have a company that is in our size and stage and it is all white guys, it is harder to convince that next person to break into that environment,” she says.

Roy Bahat and Karin Klein, both founding partners at venture capital firm Bloomberg Beta and investors in Textio, say they have seen a steady increase of women starting businesses in recent years. Ensuring that a startup has a diverse founding team is now critical to their decision to invest — particularly when it comes to companies working with AI.

“It is crystal clear that in every single AI company, the life experience of the founders and technical team drive the thinking of the technology they are building,” says Bahat. “The idea that the algorithms are objective and unbiased is complete nonsense. We are going to need the full range of human perspective building these technologies.”

Amazon’s Kroll explained these unintended biases through the lens of the software she helps program: Alexa. In order to ensure that Alexa can understand a wide range of voices that it interacts with, it’s essential that her team has a diverse set of training data. It is not just the words people say, she says, Alexa must be able to recognize the many different accents and pitches that people use when they speak. So, if her team only used male voices to train Alexa, for example, it would be more challenging for the device to assist women.

Ethical implications aside, Harvey Mudd’s Klawe pointed out that we need more women to enter AI simply to meet the ballooning demand for such talent: Only 22,000 people in the world are experts in machine learning or artificial intelligence, according to data from Montreal-based startup Element AI, a figure that won’t keep pace with increasing demand.

To meet that demand, more women like Kroll will need to enter the field; not just accidentally, but with intention.

“I would want to tell young women that just because you have other interests besides technology or computer science, that absolutely doesn’t mean you need to choose either field over those passions,” says Kroll. “Computer science is a way that you can apply your passions to many different problems.”

Photo Captions: 1) Experts in artificial intelligence attend a REWORK event in Houston, 2) Kieran Snyder speaks with Textio co-founder & CTO Jensen Harris

Kristin Keveloh and Rachel Bowley conducted the original analysis of LinkedIn’s data

Your way of addressing this matter is biased. A better, more objective way would be to see what is the ratio between the number of women applying for a certain job and the number of women getting rejected (or accepted) - you do the same for men and compare the ratios. If there is a big difference then yes we can discuss it further and consider it as being a "problem". If it's not gender related then don't make it!! In some areas feminism made it unfair for men - I get to see many PhD positions listed as "women applying will have preference" because universities/research institutes want to have a 50/50 gender ratio (this is happening for more than 60-70% of PhD listings) How is this fair for a man that is applying for a PhD position and gets rejected simply BECAUSE he is a man?? I've never heard about a case where women got rejected a job SPECIFICALLY because they were women and not men. Let's not talk about equality but instead of equity. If you insist with equality at least stick to it and not make it a women supremacy action.

Glenn Fleetwood

Associate Director of Environment & Sustainability

6 å¹´

The level of ignorance in this thread is very sad. Using the trappings of logic to build an argument on sand is negligent at best, connivant at worst. Not understanding the complexities of the root causes of this particular symptom - the lack of women in AI and tech generally in the UK (it certainly is NOT the same in Russia for instance) belies a shallow dive into the issue. Business does not act any more rationally than the humans leading it, and they are still predominantly men who grew up surrounded by casual sexism in the media, the creative arts and society at large. It takes real effort to shed that influence, and most couldn't identify it in themselves if they took the time to bother. But don't take my word for it - just scroll down the respondents list and make a note of the comments next to each person commenting and count how many take a pro and con position and who they are - middle aged white guys right through to younger women. Once you have those figures in front of you, be brave enough to stop fooling yourself.

赞
回复
Fran Hughes, CFP

Mini-retirement Specialist | Finance Coach to Executives, Professionals and Business Owners | Keynote Speaker | Media Contributor | Female Financial Wellbeing Advocate | FSPower50 Australia's Most Influential Advisers

6 å¹´
Sam Cawthorn

Obsessed with fixing problems all day every day...

6 å¹´
赞
回复
Sione Palu

Machine Learning Applied Research

6 å¹´

As far as I see, it's not an issue at all. Different people like different courses, be it ethnicity or gender. There were only 2 females in my Physics class. They're both qualified PhD Physics. One did her PhD in Quantum Mechanics (who's now teaching at?NYU Langone Health in New York) and the other one completed her PhD in Photonics & Optoelectronics and the last I heard that she was a lead R&D at?Corning Fiber-optics. We saw that there were less women enrolling in the Physics courses, but it wasn't a problem. It has never been a problem since then, but now it seems that certain people think it is a problem. Perhaps they think that women are being suppressed in trying to get into these male dominated courses, but there is none of that. I think women simply interested in different courses than men. I've never heard the feminist complaining that there are too many men in the construction industries and less women. One should get into a course, job or industry based on merit not on color of his/her skin nor gender. If women want to get into the so called male dominated fields, then there's no one stopping them. There is no coordinated efforts in the industry nor academics to stifle women's entry to these male dominated courses. In fact my old Physics Department had promoted it's courses to high school students before they enter University so to attract females, but over the years, the numbers had shown that males is still dominant in enrolling for Physics courses. I think this issue can be solved from home. Parents should encourage their kids when they're at primary or secondary schools to pursue STEM studies.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Caroline Fairchild的更多文章

  • Fortune 500’s first Latina CEO on climbing the corporate ladder: 'I'm going to get noticed and I'm going to get promoted'

    Fortune 500’s first Latina CEO on climbing the corporate ladder: 'I'm going to get noticed and I'm going to get promoted'

    Latinas stand out as the least represented group at the highest levels of corporate America: only 1 percent of C-suite…

    21 条评论
  • $2 billion in creator royalties

    $2 billion in creator royalties

    Click here to resubscribe to GM, BFF and read this week's newsletter.

    4 条评论
  • My Next Seat At The Table Is At Lean In

    My Next Seat At The Table Is At Lean In

    The first thing I saw was the table. It was my first day at Fortune Magazine in late 2013.

    101 条评论
  • The disruptive world of generative art

    The disruptive world of generative art

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox biweekly with key insights from Web3, crypto, our community and…

    5 条评论
  • The political expression of NFT art

    The political expression of NFT art

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

    3 条评论
  • When JPEGs become gin

    When JPEGs become gin

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

    1 条评论
  • What do the NFT turf wars mean for the future of Web3?

    What do the NFT turf wars mean for the future of Web3?

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

  • Black Web3 creators making waves

    Black Web3 creators making waves

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

    5 条评论
  • A passion for financial feminism

    A passion for financial feminism

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

    4 条评论
  • Crypto detectives

    Crypto detectives

    Welcome to GM, BFF, a newsletter hitting your inbox every week with key insights from web3, crypto, our community and…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了