Workplace risk management practices to prevent musculoskeletal and mental health disorders: What are the gaps?

Workplace risk management practices to prevent musculoskeletal and mental health disorders: What are the gaps?

This explored two industry sectors with high risk of both musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and mental health disorders (MHDs) and what workplace risk management practices are in place to manage those issues.

Safety documents were revised and interviews were obtained from organisations within both sectors. 10 logistics/transport companies & 9 residential aged care facilities were selected; with 67 interviews undertaken.

Results


Revealed was that risk management practices addressing MSD and MHD focused predominately on changing individual behaviours through workplace training, information and counselling, and sometimes healthy lifestyle programs rather than effective, higher-order controls.

Formal procedures for addressing biomechanical hazards impacting MSD was common but rarely corresponding procedures for controlling work-related psychological hazards.

In reviewing documents related to manual handling, it was found that manual handling was seen as synonymous with MSD, whereas the psychosocial hazards which impact MSD was generally poor. There was little in the way of documents detailing how to address MSD risk besides manual handling.


For psychosocial guidance, the majority of focus was on people’s behaviour and there were no documents “that dealt specifically with workplace requirements for managing risk of stress-related health disorders, or with all types of psychosocial hazards in the context of MH risk management, or with risks from psychosocial hazards more generally” (p224).

For worker’s mental health, focus was on personal characteristics rather than organisational factors influencing mental health.

For specific interventions for MSD/MHD, risk management focused on training and providing information. Another common approach was performance management, where supervisors/managers would try to enforce procedures. This is in contrast to effective work system design, where most psychosocial hazards are located, receiving very little targeted practices.


Thus, “risk from psychosocial hazards and associated stress is being given inadequate attention, regardless of whether the context is MSD or MHD risk management” (p228).

Overall, very few risk control actions addressed risk from psychosocial hazards at their workplace sources and had few organisational means or guidance documents to assist.

Of the interventions which existed, for MSD these focused primarily on manual handling and providing training, for MHD these focused primarily on worker behaviour outside of the work setting.

Therefore, “a significant proportion of the financial and other resources available at enterprise level to improve workers’ health and safety is not being expended with the maximum possible cost-effectiveness” (p229).


Oakman, J., Macdonald, W., Bartram, T., Keegel, T., & Kinsman, N. (2018). Workplace risk management practices to prevent musculoskeletal and mental health disorders: what are the gaps?. Safety science, 101, 220-230.

Brooke Hornsby

Senior Safety Advisor

4 个月

I wonder if the RMIT-WorkSafe Vic APHIRM program goes someway to assisting workplaces to address these gaps as it eludes to? I guess only time will tell.

回复

aimentalhealthadvisor.com AI fixes this Workplace practices fail evidence-based evaluation.

回复
Lisa Crawford

General Manager Health and Safety

4 个月

Daniel Coleman Good link to our discussion this week.

Matthew Green

Founder at BodyGuide | Author of I'm Sick of Being Sore.

4 个月

Great share Ben. What is difficult about this space is that there isn't consensus on what a high order control looks like, outside of job design & lifting aids say. Take for example residential care workers out in the community caring for people in their own homes. There's only so many controls you can put in place if you aren't in control of the environment. The same is true if you ask someone to be physical for 40+ hours a week, there's going to be an impact on the body no matter the controls. The narrative that healthy people go from 100% pain-free to injured, because of moving something poorly, is deeply linked to the prevalence of manual handling training. Underlying, unaddressed pain and movement challenges go months or years before tipping over into an LTI in these industries. From a medical perspective, the highest order control we have for people experiencing pain is to educate them, provide autonomy and actionable self-care (while encouraging early professional care). This is where psychosocial support also plays a big role. It's a wicked problem & perhaps uniquely, one that does require pain literacy alongside job design. The good news is at least we all agree on MH training being inadequate!!

Jeremy Verrillo

Confidence becomes resilience when a worker becomes an athlete. | CEO of CIP Solutions, LLC

4 个月

Love this, Ben! While we have humans doing work, we need to have MSD & MSK risk reduction programs. These get messy though since we are dealing with humans. Any program worth its salt parallel-paths hazard exposure mitigation (reducing threats) with positive health behavior promotion (reducing vulnerabilities.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ben Hutchinson的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了