Working Hard or Hardly Working (From Home)? Finding a win-win for employers and #RemoteWorkers.
Tripp and Tyler

Working Hard or Hardly Working (From Home)? Finding a win-win for employers and #RemoteWorkers.

The benefits and drawbacks of #RemoteWorkers have been debated for years.

On the one hand, embracing remote workers expands our pool of available talent and provides a level of flexibility for employees that allows for a more autonomous work-life balance. I have even heard many workers say that if they really want to be productive, they have to stay home, away from all the interruptions and distractions (read meetings and door knocks) of the office.

Sounds great, but as employers, don't we fear this:

(You're welcome). Although this was directed to small business owners, you get the point.

Is there a middle ground?

As Peter Melby, CEO of Greystone Technology in Denver discussed in a recent talk at Continuum Managed Services #Nav17 event, the more we babysit our employees, the more oppressed they feel, and the more we train them to need us in order to be productive. They don't own problems (because they don't have to) and always have to rely on employers or SoPs. Common sense goes out the door and work satisfaction plummets. And we all know where that leads.

So is the answer some kind of hybrid model that allows for working from home while also requiring some in-office time every week or month? I believe this question misses the point.

I believe the key is not the work setting. The key is the kind of behavior we are incentivizing.

The key is to incentivize productivity and outcomes that matter to the business. If we do this, we can put employers and employees on the same team, creating win-win relationships. 

What does this look like, practically? Well, just look at what we've been doing with our sales people since forever. We provide a base salary and benefits to meet basic needs (but not enough to live on), plus a merit-based component that drives employees to make the company goals, their goals. For sales people this is commission.

But is merit-based pay only for sales?

In The Great Game of Business, Jack Stack tells the story of how he turned around his company (and his leadership style) by gamifying and monetizing his company's key performance indicators (KPIs), so that his employees now had a personal, financial stake in the company's productivity and success. And it wasn't just sales people; it was factory workers, operations, finance ... everyone. By doing this, Stack was able to reinvigorate and reengage his employees, recruiting them to adopt company goals as their own. Whip-cracking and whining was out. Win-win was in.

Employee Ownership

In my own experience as an employee, I saw the power of merit-based incentives first hand. At one employer, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) gave the employees one-third ownership of the company in the form of a retirement plan, and provided a tax benefit for the company. Although a bit more abstract than Stack's system, the connection between our daily performance and our own financial benefit was clear, which it only increased as we vested over seven years. We began to think and behave like owners, because we were.

Sadly, through a merger and painful leadership changes, the ESOP plan was dissolved. As we were paid out in cash or converted to a 401K, employee moral and engagement plummeted, due in part to this change. It was more than a change in compensation; the employer-employee relationship devolved from win-win to means-to-an-end. The message was clear: you are a resource, not a team member. Scores of employees found another home, and about a year after, average employee retention sunk below one year.

Dial It In

I don't believe there is a one-size-fits-all approach to the remote worker conundrum. Whether you require employees to be in the office 40 hours a week, let them work from home, or allow a hybrid model, it's up to every employer to determine the best way to get the best from their people. At the end of the day, isn't that what it's all about?

Let's make sure we're incentivizing the right behavior, not fixating on the location of it.

What do you think? Where has your company landed on the #RemoteWorkers issue? Has your company used gamification, ESOP, or some other mechanism to incentivize behavior? What's worked or hasn't worked? Share your stories in the comments.

About the Author

Kevin Krusiewicz is Founder and Producer at TELL and TRAiN where he helps brands tell their stories and train their people through captivating websites, videos, collateral, and other marketing and training vehicles.

More info at https://TELLandTRAiN.com

Kevin Krusiewicz

"All human conflict is ultimately theological."

7 年

Here is a link to Peter Melby's talk at Continuum Managed Services's #Nav17 event where he gives away his secrets on how to change the employer-employee relationship from babysitter to boss. It includes a valuable whitepaper explaining the paradigm and blank storysheets for your 1:1 meetings! Pure gold for employers and makes for the happiest employees around. https://www.bossorbabysitter.com/navigate2017

回复
Jeff Dreiling

Chief Strategy Officer at Complete Legal?| Rediscover eDiscovery

7 年

Looking great Jean Claude !!

Kevin Krusiewicz

"All human conflict is ultimately theological."

7 年

Peter Melby can you give readers access to the employee story worksheets you showed at your Continuum Managed Services #Nav17 workshop?

回复
Adam Robinson

CEO at The Robinson Agency: A B2B Marketing Agency for Supply Chain, Logistics, Facilities, Restaurant Tech

7 年

Kevin, I love the hybrid approach. I struggle sometimes to think about corporate life as my experience has been sort of a lone wolf/mostly autonomous worker for a decade now being some W-2 income and some 1099. In former agency/sales environments, I know for sure I would have been worse off working from home. In marketing, other marketers, disciplines in marketing like creative, we have sort of grown accustomed to collaboration using technology and it not hurting TOO much of the collaborative process. That's why working from home for me has been very effective since I now work in a more in-house marketing type role and with clients as a consultant. However, I think it also works because of the incentivization I have as I also own my own business and my money is directly tied to the effort I put in and the attitude I put forth. I think you nailed it for the everyday boss though. Great article. For Example, at Cerasis, where my day job is a Marketing Manager, they offer profit sharing to our 401(k) and that has absolutely skyrocketed my desire to get more leads and help close business because I get a monetary payout. At Cerasis we even have an employee who got a wild hair and wanted to move from Minnesota (where HQ is) to Ireland. She works from IRELAND 6 time zones away and it works! We have much more examples like that in Cerasis that work well (me included). As a manager, however, I do go into the office about twice per week as I think it is important to hear from the boots on the ground folks so I can better understand customers and understand the work our people do on behalf of our customers as the work is being done in order to truly better market to the industry. I plan around those days to have intent and purpose in my collaboration vs. just letting it happen. Therefore, making some days work from home and some work from the office, another approach, could make staff more focused and more purposeful.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了