Work-Life Balance: Why the 70-90 Hour Workweek Doesn't Work

Work-Life Balance: Why the 70-90 Hour Workweek Doesn't Work

The recent debate about 70-90 hour workweeks in India has sparked crucial conversations about sustainable work practices and organizational success. While my previous article examined the broader social implications of this issue, this piece delves deeper into why applying founder-level work expectations across an entire organization is fundamentally flawed.

Hard work is critical for success, but does it guarantee results? Strategic thinking, teamwork, and innovation are equally vital. This raises a question: Is working 70-90 hours a week truly sustainable or productive, or is it a damaging myth?

The "10,000 Hours" Rule

The “10,000 hours” rule shows that mastery requires focus and deliberate practice. This ethos often drives initial success in startups or intense fields like sports. However, not everyone achieves similar results despite equal effort—highlighting that success is influenced by multiple factors beyond sheer hard work.

The Myth of the 70/90-Hour Workweek: When Does It Work?

Extended hours can work in specific scenarios, such as for passionate individuals or during short-term high-stakes periods. Founders and those deeply invested in their work often thrive on long hours because their passion fuels their energy and creativity. When you're passionate about your work, it doesn't feel like a grind—it feels like purpose-driven effort, which can sustain longer hours without immediate burnout. However, expecting 95% of employees to work such hours is impractical. Research shows productivity drops sharply after 50 hours per week, with no added output beyond 55 hours. Overwork results in burnout, reduced efficiency, and poor organizational outcomes.

Why Do Leaders Advocate for 70-90 Hour Workweeks?

Leaders advocating extreme work hours may perceive younger generations as less committed or fail to align hiring practices with their culture. If relentless work is a company expectation, it must be transparently communicated during recruitment to avoid mismatched expectations and high turnover. Clear communication ensures new hires align with organizational demands.

Leadership and the 90-Hour Workweek

Leaders working 90-hour weeks may reflect issues like poor delegation, talent gaps, or weak succession planning. Overburdened leaders set unhealthy expectations for teams, leading to burnout, reduced creativity, and high turnover. Long-term success requires leaders to delegate effectively and model sustainable work practices.

Passion: The Driving Force Behind Long Hours

Passion transforms work into an exciting challenge rather than an obligation. When individuals genuinely love what they do, they often lose track of time, willingly putting in extra hours to achieve their goals. However, this intrinsic motivation is personal—it cannot be imposed. Leaders must recognize and respect the balance between passion-driven productivity and unrealistic demands, ensuring employees aren’t pressured to match someone else's drive.

Key Challenges of Overwork

  • Recruitment Mismatches: Poor alignment between hiring and company culture.
  • Ineffective Delegation: Leaders overburden themselves instead of empowering teams.
  • Rigid Hierarchies: Command-and-control structures delay decisions and prolong work hours.
  • Lack of Innovation: Overworked employees are too drained to think creatively or propose solutions.

Healthy Work Cultures vs. Toxic Work Cultures

In toxic cultures, overwork is glorified, leading to burnout and inefficiency. Healthy cultures, by contrast, prioritize employee well-being, work-life balance, and personal growth—boosting productivity, retention, and innovation.

My Own Experiences

Motivated teams excel when supported by a healthy culture. In a startup I worked for, team members willingly contributed long hours because they shared a clear sense of purpose and were adequately rewarded. In another instance, a colleague planned a two-week vacation, and our team ensured proper project adjustments and backups, enabling a smooth workflow during their absence. Their return was celebrated, fostering camaraderie and demonstrating the importance of balance.

The Path Forward

Sustainable success requires moving beyond simplistic metrics of hours worked to focus on value created. While input and effort matter, leaders must prioritize systems and cultures that foster collaboration, innovation, and well-being.

Final Thoughts

Leaders advocating long hours often overlook differences in motivations, rewards, and autonomy between themselves and their teams. Overwork cultures lead to burnout, high turnover, and diminished creativity, harming long-term success. Passion for one’s work can sustain productivity over longer hours, but it thrives best when supported by a positive and balanced work culture.

An organization thrives when its people thrive. By fostering balance, innovation, and passion, leaders can ensure sustainable growth and collective excellence.


What are your thoughts?

?

Dhara M.

Delivery Manager at Harbinger Group. Certified: SAFe5? SA | CSM? | PSPO? | Six Sigma?

1 个月

Thank you, sir, for this great post. My thoughts really echo what you've shared. Is working 90 hours with only 40 productive hours from one person real growth, or is having two people working 45 hours each with 40 productive hours each real growth for the country? How do people become CEOs by making one person do the work of two? This isn't country growth; it’s a way to harm the country. Anyone can work 70 to 90 hours if they have enough growth opportunities, but they also care about how much time they can spend with their family. You can’t create a healthy culture this way.

回复
Aadesh Goyal

Advisory Board, HR Tech & Digital Transformation, Leadership Development and Coach, Independent Board Director, Future of Work, Culture & Ethics, Happiness & Well-being Teacher, Global CHRO.

1 个月

... continued from previous comment. When people take up a job, their expectation is not that they are participating in nation-building. The rules and environment in which a commercial company works are usually very different from nation building. Entrepreneurs are also mission driven. A core team around them would be similar. But as the organization grows beyond a point, it is rarely possible to continue the spirit of mission. There is one more dimension. If a company operates in many countries, then its policies and environment need to be consistent and conducive for a global setting (with localization, as appropriate). In such a MNC, could there be a spirit of nation building that's applicable and resonates with employees all over the world. Employees in one country would usually not be excited about contributing to the nation-building-spirit of another country (in which their employer is headquartered). Thoughts?

Aadesh Goyal

Advisory Board, HR Tech & Digital Transformation, Leadership Development and Coach, Independent Board Director, Future of Work, Culture & Ethics, Happiness & Well-being Teacher, Global CHRO.

1 个月

You have brought out many a dimensions of this topic, Ajay Gupta. Participation in a nation-building mission implies that the individual is totally inspired by the vision and purpose. They will join the mission voluntarily. When there is extreme inspiration, there is unfailing commitment and focus. When doubts and challenges come during the journey, the commitment, enthusiasm and the missionary-spirit of greater good pulls you ahead. For example, Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DOT), founded in 1984, was one such mission. Hundreds of people bought into the mission, and there was never any lack of effort. It was a herculean effort over several years. The team achieved in 5-6 years what MNCs in other countries took 15-20 years to build. I had the good fortune to participate in this amazing mission for 7 years - so have the first hand feel for this. ISRO - Indian Space Research Organization is certainly an organization that's doing the nation-building. And, I am sure, there are many a great examples. .... continued in next comment due to limit on number of characters.

回复

Ajay Gupta Hello sir Garvesh Chaudhary this side ???? I dropped a proposal in your inbox ?? Kindly accept my proposal ???? Waiting for your response ?? Thanks

回复
Sharmistha Dutta

Growth advisor/Social impact/TA head/Employer Branding/HR/Entrepreneur

1 个月

Ajay, I worked in my career 24/7 in the early 90s. Different age and expectations. Maybe the older leaders need to communicate to a young population.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ajay Gupta的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了