The Work-Family Dilemma: Myth or Reality?
Janani Ramesh
Ph.D. Candidate in Organizational Behavior at McGill University | MILR '22 Cornell University
As an organizational sociologist focused on gender dynamics in workplaces, I deeply empathize with working parents, especially women who traditionally take on caregiving roles, as they navigate the challenges of balancing work and family responsibilities. I’m usually very optimistic about women’s opportunities in the workplace, having grown up in a generation that thinks it could “have it all”. However, research on this subject often presents divided perspectives. Here, I offer a summary of what research suggests regarding the work-family dilemma: is it a myth or a reality? In this article, I invite interested readers to explore whether their personal experiences align with the various research findings discussed.
In the sociology and organizational theory literature, the work-family dilemma or the work-family narrative encapsulates the deep-seated conflict between women's roles as primary caregivers and the time constraints imposed by their professional obligations, often resulting in their premature exit from the workforce. The discourse surrounding the work-family narrative takes many twists and turns, dating back to Lisa Belkin’s provocative 2003 New York Times Magazine article, “The Opt-Out Revolution”, which claimed that women could run the world but “they don’t want to”. According to Belkin, the reason why women haven't achieved gender equality with men in the professional sphere is because they have different aspirations now than previous generations of women. They'd rather be at home with their kids than the CEO of a company, a prestigious university professor, or a big-shot lawyer. However, this narrative fails to resonate with contemporary realities. Scrutiny of empirical evidence casts doubt on the validity of the "opt-out" hypothesis, particularly among younger cohorts of women born in the 1960s and 1970s. Analysis of census and survey data reveals a notable uptick in full-time employment and extended work hours among these cohorts compared to their predecessors. This demographic shift underscores a fundamental transformation in the female workforce, characterized by an increased presence of women balancing professional careers with familial responsibilities. Therefore, media claims of an "opt-out" phenomenon among professional women seem to be largely unfounded. In the decades since Belkin published her article, various studies have shown that the work-family narrative lacks empirical support and is, for the most part, a myth (Cha, 2013; Damaske, 2011; Stone & Hernandez, 2013).?
Although sociologists have critiqued the work-family explanation as overly simplistic, it continues to pervade all aspects of modern organizational life. In a 2013 study of over 6,500 Harvard Business School alumni spanning various sectors, a significant majority, comprising 73 percent of men and 85 percent of women, attributed women's hindered career progression to their perceived prioritization of family obligations over professional pursuits (Ely, Stone, and Ammerman, 2014). In another study of a professional service firm by Padavic and Ely (2020), virtually all employees and senior leaders recited the work-family narrative as the root of women’s stalled advancement at the firm. In their interviews with the firm’s employees, Padavic and Ely discovered that the work-family narrative lacked completeness. They observed that both male and female employees at the firm encountered work-family conflict. However, women, traditionally being primary caregivers, faced a more significant penalty as they were stigmatized when requesting employer support for flexible work policies, consequently hindering their career progression. Despite this finding, Padavic and Ely faced resistance from their firm regarding the study’s results which confirmed their suspicion that the work-family narrative had become a deeply entrenched, status-quo enhancing, “hegemonic” narrative that the firm unconsciously used to protect more powerful groups in the organization, such as white men and the firm’s leaders, thereby sustaining workplace inequality.
In conclusion, research suggests that while the work-family narrative may be a myth, the powerful attitudes that work to perpetuate it are equally damaging to women’s prospects in the workplace. Put differently, it's more accurate to assert that women are "pushed out" rather than "choosing to opt-out" of the workplace due to the influence of more powerful groups invested in maintaining gender inequality.
What do you think? In your experience, is the work-family narrative a myth or a reality? Join the conversation on the research on gender equality in organizations by sharing your reactions with the author at [email protected]
领英推荐
Janani Ramesh is a doctoral student in Organizational Behavior at McGill University’s Desautels Faculty of Management. Her research interests include gender dynamics, workplace disparities, caste discrimination, and career trajectories.
References:
?
Ph.D. Candidate in Organizational Behavior at McGill University | MILR '22 Cornell University
8 个月Elena Obukhova John-Paul Ferguson curious to know your thoughts!