A word to "FinTech Thought Leaders"
Duena Blomstrom
Author | Keynote Speaker | Podcaster |Digital Transformation & Organizational Psychology Expert | Creator of Emotional Banking?, NeuroSpicy@Work & HumanDebt? | Co-Founder of PeopleNotTech? | AuADHD
Dear new FinTech Thought Leader/Commentator,
(Note: this is only written for those who actually contribute, create and participate and not just amplify. Retweeting, adding a picture and hashtagging may be useful self promotion but it's valueless and doesn't register at all as a voice in the industry in my book)
We must stop talking *at* bankers. I realise it pays the bills at times but it's not helping anyone create real value.
I would have thought as the industry matures the amount of bank bashing would decrease because we would have less and less to point out. To be fair while the industry matured in knowledge that has not trickled down to consumer (yet) and the MoneyMoments/experiences/interractions the banks put out there are objectively sup-par and that needs expressing, but pointing and laughing at a hole in the road never made it magically plug itself.
Ours today is an industry so interwoven there is no black and white, no way to pick a side to either "help the banks" or "fight the banks". Let's face it, there is no B2C pure-play grass-roots FinTech financial services provider that single-handedly wants to take on the world. If that unicorn existed then their job would be to do nothing but show how useless incumbent banks are. Everyone else, the big names that go to consumers directly, the lenders, even GAFA, they all work *with* the banks for now so helping should be on everyone's agenda.
Some would say I'm equally guilty, that I used to complain incessantly and I would like to say I thought I was always just on the side of the consumer - that with the banking customer hat on, I'd just report on bad experiences and with my professional hat on, I'd come up with ideas on how to help bankers fix those experiences hence why I built the Emotional Banking method, but I can't claim my hands are clean, at one point I did feel like I was slipping towards just negative criticism and then I reminded myself that beyond evidently useless and not constructive, it's part of why we are stuck in this place and I have to do better.
Sure there's a living to be made by just deploring how bad things are in banking, but are we turning every conversation into a carrousel of same complaints as 2002 with no intention of really rolling our sleeves at the end of the moaning session or b!tch fest? Are we not part of the problem then?
It's not about "if you have nothing nice to say don't say anything" but about the essence of constructive criticism which is pointing out a problem only if you can come up with real ideas as to how to solve it and 90% of the pieces I read or listen to these days in the industry from the new contingent still have absolutely nothing in the way of a suggestion.
Do we expect to change banking by the magical powers of catharsis? Some top bankers will read something we wrote or hear us at some conference and they will have an "a-ha!" moment of such magnitude they will champion immediate cultural transformation and use tech to make addictive banking experiences? Is that the goal? Well darn, then let's carry on. Anything but that, we're making the problem larger.
In the era of gender and pay parity pledges shall we do a FinTech constructive criticism one and see if we can actually all use our minds for positive outcomes? What good are we if a new bank CEO with plenty of passion and "a-ha"s looks at us for hands-on examples of how to turn his ship around and gets diatribe instead?
My turn: how about we construct a database of positive examples from incumbent banks. Let's face it, we still reference mBank as the poster child for digital transformation 5 years later. Let's find and popularise the rest of the wins.
I know most of us old-timers who have been in this long enough, have a host of examples of actual change -we have at times been part of creating ourselves!- with incumbent banks, let's champion them instead of holding those cards close to our chest for our boardroom exec presentations. The opposite of "name and shame" - "name and praise".
We should also encourage the bankers we're working with right now to tell us more of their story as well, there must be loads of goodness they can see around them they never talk about partly because the problem is too big to be sorted by those examples and partly because let's face it, misery loves company and the level of commentary we provide is a lot more conducive to them joining in the bank bashing themselves.
In my book I wrote extensively about DBS' cultural transformation. That's an amazing example and a good blue print and there are others.
The "FinTech Constructive Criticism Pledge". Who's in?
Identifying Growth Opportunity, Streamlining Operations, and Revitalizing Workplace Vitality
6 年Great perspective, Duena - it's an important point that not many people are talking about. I agree with the premise as well as Paul's comments. It's true that large organizations are slower to change, however, many banks know they need to change and are actively trying to do so. In a recent survey I just read, it states 74% of bank operations leaders feel improving the customer experience is their top strategic priority (this is a change from 5 years ago) - all the more reason to celebrate the successes when we see them. (fraud and risk management was next, cited by 70% -- interesting because fraudulent activity has increased exponentially as customer experience initiatives like digital on-boarding have enhanced). As well, almost 40% said that the limitations of their legacy systems are among the top three impediments to digital transformation and 70% said they think their operations hold trapped value that is not currently being accessed. Changing legacy systems, strategic direction and addressing these issues in global institutions with 20,000+ employees and multiple silos isn't an easy or inexpensive venture. This is an industry that moves at a snails pace and has only recently been challenged by technology (fintechs), but they are still governed by a massive bureaucracy that moves slower than a snail...The hope is that, we as consumers, continue to drive governing bodies to become more innovative, while institutions continue to be challenged by fintechs to provide better and more efficient models of engagement and that the organizations stop relying on their size and realize that the customer is driving the experience. I recently spoke at a conference about how the 'last best' experience a customer has is the minimum expectation they have for the next....Amazon, Nordstrom, etc. are now challenging the status quo in all industries as to customer expectations. Up to this point the banking institutions have been able to rely on their size, assets and market control to drive what they believe is "good" customer service - now that the customer is driving the CX definition, fintechs are challenging the established models, regulation is being challenged by new entrants and "outside" institutions are trying to move into the banking model (Amazon)...hopefully we can all work together to instigate real beneficial change to all parties - it has to be a win-win!
Strategy, Planning and Delivery
6 年Hi Duena, Thankyou for writing this piece. Due to the complexity of large organizations and the pace of improvement do you have themes and goals you want to impart so people in large orgs can get behind the idea in their own way and can be measured ? Rather than just talking about it as you say. Many people have the will and influence but the goals need to be measurable inside and outside an organisation to support marketplace change. Suggestions welcome.
Product Lead| Strategy |Project Management
6 年From a Business Development point of view we need to hear more of constructive criticism as a voice of the customer that will enable us to produce better products and services
karyawan di PD TOSHA FABRICS
6 年Hei
Bravo! Let's use social proof to unlock change.