WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY: The Stakes Keep Getting Higher
The transformative power of technology is increasingly impacting all other industries. It’s now blurring boundaries between sectors – with companies increasingly developing their own digital platforms and solutions. The impact of these new technologies promises to usher in a future with endless possibilities and new opportunities.
But unfortunately, that’s bad news for women.
Disruptive technologies, including the rise of robots and artificial intelligence, will result in a net loss of 5.1 million jobs by 2020 in 15 leading countries according to the World Economic Forum’s latest The Future of Jobs report. And while the report stresses that these job losses will be offset by the creation of 2 million new jobs, it also acknowledges that women will suffer the most as many of their jobs are concentrated in areas that can be automated relatively easily, such as sales, office, administrative roles etc.
Within the tech industry itself there has been little movement in the last year despite vows to address issues of #gender #diversity and women representation in leadership. In its diversity report issued last November, Microsoft stated that the percentage of women it employed globally fell from 29 percent in mid-2014 to 26.8 percent, though it added a few women to its leadership team. At Google, the overall representation of women stayed flat at 30% from 2014 to 2015, while those in leadership edged up from 21 to 22 percent.
So, with women barely making progress in #technology, what will happen as other sectors increasingly demand technological skills for success?
The reasons given for why women are making little headway in this critical industry are many. It starts, of course, with relatively few women pursuing computer science in school. Today, just 18 percent of U.S. computer science college graduates are women. That’s down from 37 percent in 1985 and far behind India, for example, where women account for more than 40 percent of computer science graduates.
But many people are also pointing to the “leaky pipeline” as another major contributor to the lack of parity in science, engineering and technology. A 2014 Center for Talent Innovation study published in the Harvard Business Review found that women working in STEM fields are 45 percent more likely than their male colleagues to leave their industries within a year. The research identifies a number of drivers for this disparity, such as conscious and unconscious biases, women feeling stalled in their careers, high-tech’s “geek workplace culture,” double standards in training opportunities and perceived prejudices in performance evaluations.
For example, in the U.S., nearly half of women working in tech believe senior management judge men as better suited for leadership than women. Even worse, nearly one-third of top management agree that no woman would reach leadership positions of their companies regardless of abilities or performance. It’s even worse news in India, where a full two-thirds of the industry’s senior leaders believe that women will never rise to top. That’s certainly discouraging news for women considering a move into technology roles and for female computer science graduates starting out in their careers.
Such concerns have certainly not been lost on #universities and tech companies, and there are of course no easy solutions. So a number of them have launched a variety of initiatives to bring more women into tech and keep them there.
At Stanford, for the first time, computer science has become the most popular major for female students, with women now accounting for 30 percent of all computer science majors. In 2009, the department revamped its #undergraduate curriculum, adding more multi-disciplinary tracks, such as psychology and product design, to broaden the major’s appeal. And it started recruiting talented female students – aiming to build their confidence and underscore technology’s potential for social good.
Microsoft has long sponsored a program to get more female high-schoolers interested in high-tech careers, created “mentoring rings” to help retain female employees and formalized an initiative to help lift more women into “managers of managers” positions. Google has expanded its benefits, such as its caregiver program, to meet more of the life-work needs of women and men, while actively tackling unconscious bias in its ranks.
Other firms have launched innovative new efforts. To bypass male-dominated college computer science programs, Etsy’s founders began investing in talented women not trained in programming with three-month scholarships to the Hacker School. Within a year, Etsy increased the number of women on its engineering team by five-fold.
These steps are headed in the right direction, but the point stands that we are at a crucial crossroads in the future of women in tech, as well as a fast-growing list of other industries. With women being more or less excluded from an industry that is changing every part of our life, we run the risk of further exacerbating gender inequalities. Simply put, we all need to do more and that includes women.
As organizations like Girls Who Code and events like the Grace Hopper Conference underscore, women need to help transform the high-tech world – from the all-boy video game culture to a more #inclusive workplace culture where people from all backgrounds can succeed.
And women have to think about how they approach success in this #industry. As the Center for Talent Innovation explored in a 2014 study, ambitious men and #women generally want the same things out of their high-tech careers – such as the ability to flourish, excel and reach for meaning and purpose. But unlike men, many women don’t connect achieving their ambitions to the need for power. Instead, many women see the burdens of leadership outweighing the benefits, and lose interest.
We are in #Davos at the World Economic Forum to discuss the full impact of the fourth industrial revolution and there is much fuel for serious reflection about the role of diversity in shaping the future. Let’s make sure we include in our discussion the search for solutions that bridge the current chasm between women and their place in technology. Given the rate and extent of change driven by this industry and the potentially different or divergent impact on men and women, diversity and inclusion are now more important than ever before.
# # #
The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the global EY organization or its member firms.
FCA, Ecommerce entrepreneur who coaches | Ecommerce Club and Ecommerce Scotland |Co-Head W20 UK promoting equality | NED
7 年While women are considered to leave the work force from 24-35 to have children even with education on STEM subjects they will feel walked over for promotion whilst it is seen as acceptable that more hours at work in the office means more productivity. It has to become more acceptable in future generations for home working and flexi hours to accommodate not just women working at home or flexi hours but also our new generation of teenagers who are clued to IT, cannot get up in the mornings before 11am to hold down a 9-5 or longer position and are used to staying up until 2-3 in the morning. If we wish to capture this generation in appealing jobs then we need to start considering staggered working hours and other flexible hours to be acceptable for the entire workforce and cover the need for a 24-7 economy.
Real Estate Sales Associate at Century 21 Hometown Realty
8 年In response Ruth Mallors-Ray, you are absolutely correct about the need to get more women involved in STEM and also to promote STEM amongst young girls. Because of lack of classes where I live, I have had discussions with the public high school about having Intro Computer Science classes available for all students, not just the high-achieving AP students. Everyone should be able to learn about Computer Science and Programming - it is just as important as learning Math and English. The important skills in school are: Science, Technology, Engineering, Math but schools would like to teach kids only three subjects: History, English, 1 year of Math. We have experienced this first hand. The education system is broken.
Advisor at the Interface of Aid, Trade & Governance
8 年Thank you for this article, I will for sure use it in my work to increase female participation for Institutes of Technology and within PhD opportunities! In addition I came across an article a while ago where referals were made to achievements of women in technology and some applications we are using today (e.g. downloading mail into your mailbox) was developed by a female scientist. Instead of women putting eachother down and attacking eachother we should all put in a joined effort to raise awareness on what women did achieve!!! Yes, we do have to work harder, but that is because we can do it! As rightfully mentioned it is important that women in leading positions should use their positions to let more women in. Let′s do this ladies! As it is crazy in this world that the ′old man sigar club′ still takes the lead, while there are many talented young women that could work together in order to go beyond what has been achieved up to now. My company only employs young, talented African women. They can propose their idea to me how they want to work and I will hire them. As I am a small firm the numbers are not impressive, but my idea seems to work when it comes to empowerment and selfesteem. My employees are happy to work with me and feel confident.
Professor at EM Normandie Business School, Metis Lab
8 年From the job statistics you give in the second paragrpaph you seem to be focusing your analysis on the displacement of people in lower level jobs (a thing of the past machine revolution.) But what about the impact that cognitivie computing will have on displacing people at very senior professional jobs? We know that this will cause a polarisation of the professions, with a small number of professionals who understand how to adopt cognitive computing into their decision-making becoming super-stars while the majority will sink into oblivion. It is in this area where we should be working to make women successful.