Witness coached whilst giving evidence by Zoom

Witness coached whilst giving evidence by Zoom

I do not normally comment on US cases but a recent case caught my eye: Nuvasive, Inc. v. Absolute Medical, LLC,?No.22-10214, where the 11th?Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to overturn an arbitration award more than 3 months after the statutory deadline to challenge the award.??This was because one of the respondents was coaching the witness who was testifying by video conference,?by texting him answers to questions as they were being asked.?

The text messages were produced in discovery in different litigation more than three months after the award.?The court waived the 3-month deadline based upon “extraordinary circumstances”?and vacated the award because of fraud.

It is the ever present risk - is the tribunal receiving the unvarnished truth? Or is the witness being coached off camera? There are many good guidelines for tribunals to adopt but to me the following are a bare minimum:

  • Require a remote witness to state who, if anybody, is in the room with them (often opposing counsel may wish to have a 'watching brief' in the room where the witness is, to ensure fair play - I have seen counsel instruct foreign correspondent lawyers for that purpose);?
  • Have witnesses confirm their agreement not to accept any outside communication of any kind and either surrender their phone to counsel or confirm it is switched off (this does not, however, prevent the burner phone type issue);
  • Confirm with the witness that no communication has occurred during the testimony;?
  • Consider whether insisting that a witness give evidence from a local counsel's offices or an arbitration centre where some safeguards can be put in place;
  • Be?alert to delay (perhaps especially when interpretation is happening and the witness might understand the language of the question but wish to answer in a different language) in answering questions and eye movements to where a phone or coach might be;
  • Encourage any concerns to be raised immediately so that they can be addressed (rather than, say, in closing arguments); and
  • Be sure that all participants can see the witness at all times and have a camera set up to see the entire room (or do a sweep of the room with whatever camera is being used).?

Claire Stockford, FCIArb

International Arbitration and Public International Law Specialist Barrister at Quadrant Chambers

1 年

Yikes. It shows the expense of additional cameras/having local counsel present when evidence is being given can be a very worthwhile investment.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Peter Ashford的更多文章

  • Arbitration Bill / Act (final post)

    Arbitration Bill / Act (final post)

    Yesterday Royal Assent was given to the Bill and we now have the AA25. Three rather dull sections are immediately in…

    2 条评论
  • Prostate Cancer (IV)

    Prostate Cancer (IV)

    Reported today in the Times is that a "supertest" for prostate cancer has been developed. It analyses both blood and…

  • Award Set Aside: Contract Interpretation not put to Claimant to address

    Award Set Aside: Contract Interpretation not put to Claimant to address

    In Mare Nova v Zhangjiagang Jiushin [2025] the award was successfully challenged for serious irregularity leading to…

    1 条评论
  • Arbitration Bill (penultimate update)

    Arbitration Bill (penultimate update)

    On 11 February 2025, the Bill completed its passage through the House of Commons completing its consideration by the…

  • Prostate Cancer (III)

    Prostate Cancer (III)

    Further to my posts at https://www.linkedin.

    2 条评论
  • London Pre-Moot - Panel Discussion

    London Pre-Moot - Panel Discussion

    I am delighted to be moderating a panel discussion on the procedural issues in the moot problem, kindly hosted by…

  • Canadian Courts get it right (and wrong) on Conflicts

    Canadian Courts get it right (and wrong) on Conflicts

    Courts of Appeal in Canada have considered conflict issues twice in recent months. The most recent is Vento Motorcycles…

    1 条评论
  • Arbitration Bill (further update)

    Arbitration Bill (further update)

    The Bill was debated at second reading on Wednesday 29 January in the House of Commons and has now been committed to a…

  • Prostate Cancer (II)

    Prostate Cancer (II)

    Is now the most common cancer in England with cases having risen over 25% in the last 5 years, overtaking breast…

    3 条评论
  • Prostate Cancer

    Prostate Cancer

    A year ago today I went 'under the knife' and had a Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) performed by Mr…

    15 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了