Is it wisdom or self-preservation?

What are the odds, By any means necessary, I will die for the people cause I love the people – a handful of phrases spoken by numerous martyrs who fought and perished in the pursuit of civil, economic, and human rights for African Americans. The circumstances faced by these courageous individuals were abhorrent, and any attempt to challenge the status quo seemed like an act of self-sacrifice. The law enforcement and security apparatus of that era often resorted to violent measures to suppress the progress of the movements these martyrs spearheaded. Nevertheless, their unwavering sense of purpose served as the driving force that rendered any opposition powerless. As a Christian, I draw parallels with biblical figures who willingly sacrificed their lives to ensure that the truth prevailed, both in sharing the good news of Jesus Christ to the unsaved and in confronting different political powers. In every society, you will find intellectuals and influential individuals who opt to be sycophants, essentially seeking to appease those in positions of authority. Conversely, there are those who strive to uphold ethical standards within the ruling class of society.

Although the Holy Bible offers numerous instances of prophets and apostles who courageously walked the 'narrow path,' challenging authorities and advocating for righteousness in society, there appears to be a shift in the mindset of many individuals entrusted with leadership roles within the church. This shift pertains to their lack of readiness to 'confront authority' and champion righteousness, particularly in today's context where the promises made by the ruling class do not align with the prevailing challenges faced by the populace. For clarity, this discussion pertains to political leadership in African society, a society endowed with the potential to become a global superpower not just in theory but in practice.

I've observed that individuals who attempt to question authority are often met with advice such as 'take care of yourself' or 'tread lightly,' with reminders that not every battle should be fought and encouragement to be content with one's current situation. Additionally, there's the assertion that the government isn't responsible for personal problems, so one should exercise wisdom. While these words may seem comforting and may even stem from a place of sincere concern, heeding to them might be destructive not just to one but also to one's society. A wise individual once noted, acts of compassion do not always equate to love. Although it is undoubtedly important to protect oneself to ensure that life's purpose is fulfilled, this protection should arise from genuine altruism rather than self-preservation disguised as wisdom.

In my perspective, Chairman Fred Hampton, who held the position of Deputy Chairman of the Black Panther Party and served as the leader of the Illinois chapter in the United States, embodied the true essence of someone who willingly sacrificed his life for the people, showing unwavering dedication even in the face of death. In his early twenties, he astutely recognized that achieving civil rights for Black Americans necessitated forming alliances with other minority groups as a strategic approach. He actively worked to unite with these groups. His exceptional charisma and visionary outlook, especially considering the prevalent era of overt oppression, can only be described as profoundly righteous.

I use this young man as an example because, the above words of advice, could have easily fit for him. In fact many similar arguments were made throughout the 60s and 70s era of the civil rights struggle, and are even still made today.

In a 1969 interview on the Dick Cavett Show, James Baldwin engaged in a discussion with Yale Professor Paul Weiss. The professor seemed to suggest that Mr. Baldwin's success as an author and intellectual was evidence that the system was not inherently oppressive. According to this view, those who worked diligently could overcome any challenges, and therefore, the African American community should focus on individual progress rather than complaint. Mr. Baldwin, however, countered this perspective. Despite his (Mr. Baldwin's) numerous achievements in academia, he asserted that it had not brought about any meaningful change in the system of oppression faced by Black Americans in the United States. Personal success can serve as a motivating force for individuals striving to overcome life's challenges. However, in situations where systemic barriers have been firmly established, individual achievements may have limited impact.

Similarly, in a 1961 debate involving George Schuyler, Malcolm X, and C. Eric Lincoln, George Schuyler advanced comparable arguments. He contended that significant progress had been made for Black Americans, suggesting that Malcolm X's arguments lacked substantial basis. It's important to note that these discussions occurred during a period marked by widespread and systemic racial discrimination.

It's noteworthy that the arguments and systems of oppression have persisted unchanged. For instance, in Ghana (my home country), many advocate that it is one's best efforts that leads to success. However, an A-student may require additional support from a politician or a wealthy individual (if it is even possible) to secure a decent livelihood after completing university. Similarly, an ambitious African entrepreneur, despite possessing exceptional brilliance, must acknowledge the possibility of encountering obstacles in their entrepreneurial journey. This is particularly true when competing against well-established foreign multinationals who have accumulated substantial wealth over time and often receive more incentives from the government, which the entrepreneur may have supported through their vote. All of this despite the best efforts of such individuals in life.

So, what do I promote? I encourage those who have achieved a measure of success not to keep the disadvantaged uninformed about the realities of the economic system. If young Africans and responsible leaders who have climbed the ladder of success can join forces, just like it happened in the 1960s in America and in Africa, significant progress can be achieved. To the middle-class, I urge you not to withhold your voice. Speak out, and don't do it in isolation—speak out both to those in positions of power and alongside those who may lack power.

Shalom.