Winning the Power Game
Jean-Manuel Izaret (JMI)
Global Leader of Marketing, Sales & Pricing Practice | Managing Director & Senior Partner at Boston Consulting Group
Dear Friends,
The Strategic Pricing Hexagon and the seven games made their first public appearance this week at the 4th?Annual?Pricing Strategy?USA Summit in Los Angeles.
The next major public appearance is less than a month away, at the fall conference of the Professional Pricing Society in Atlanta . On Thursday, October 12th, I will deliver a keynote address on strategic pricing, and my colleague Steven Greene will hold a breakout session on how companies can go “Beyond the Cost Game” to develop solutions for inflationary pressures. Following Steven’s session, I will moderate a keynote town-hall forum.
If you’re interested in attending, there is still time to register for the conference.
In the previous three newsletters, my co-author Arnab Sinha ?and I focused on the Value Game, Uniform Game, and Cost Game. Each of these games in the top half of the Hexagon corresponds to pricing frameworks and approaches that are commonly taught and widely practiced: value-based pricing, price elasticity, and cost-plus pricing.
But as we move downward in the Hex, we encounter the market or competitive situations where those approaches and frameworks either offer limited help or can even be detrimental.
One of those situations leads to the Power Game, which we focus on this week.
As always, we thank you for your interest and support and ask that you please share your thoughts and questions with us!
Winning the Power Game
One of the most enduring clichés in marketing is that “the market sets the price.” Business leaders may feel they lack pricing power in the conventional sense, because they don’t have obvious differentiation or loud competitive advantages.
This is especially true when the market is highly concentrated on both sides. The outcome of every deal matters materially when a limited number of suppliers – each with a portfolio of relatively comparable solutions – battles for business in a relatively open game with a small number of customers who are familiar to all parties.
What matters in those markets, however, is not the exercise of pricing power. It is the maintenance of the balance of power.
That is the essence of the Power Game.
The figure below summarizes the characteristics of markets where the Power Game applies: high or very high concentration on both the buyer and seller sides, and offers that have limited differentiation, usually because buyers impose standards that make offers comparable.
Success in the Power Game depends on a leadership team’s ability to understand and manage fine points of equilibrium in the market. The main pricing framework that governs their decision-making is game theory.
The importance of game theory
The loss of any customer contract in the Power Game will have a significant negative impact on a company’s financial performance. This risk of losing business may compel a company to resort to aggressive discounting to salvage a negotiation, to compensate for a slight product disadvantage, or to make a short-term play to gain share.
The application of game theory serves as a safeguard against this kind of behavior. Players of Power Game conduct high stakes negotiations in a repeated prisoner’s dilemma. With few exceptions – such as strong customer preference, geopolitical interference, or missed product cycles – all suppliers in a Power Game market compete for opportunities on an equal plane.
While individual suppliers – at least superficially – may appear to be fungible, the small cohort of suppliers is anything but fungible. The buyers depend heavily on a small set of suppliers to deliver quality products timely and affordably, but they also depend on them to invest enough to innovate and help the buying companies maintain their own competitive positions with their own customers.
The constant search for an edge
Sellers have an interest in maintaining the integrity of prices across their own portfolio, while at the same time maintaining a balance in the market that is in the mutual interest of both themselves and their customers. To accomplish this, companies need to make unilateral moves to remain compliant with the law.
But the law does not compel any company to make self-destructive unilateral moves. To establish the difference, successful sellers in the Power Game make significant investments to analyze subtle differences across every deal with every buyer. Such imbalances – or what we call advantageous asymmetries – exist in almost every Power Game market and are the only sustainable way to gain share. Share gained through lower prices can only be temporary, because competitors will quickly lower their own prices in response. Time and time again, companies may risk a price war as they try to use lower prices to compensate for product quality weaknesses or product delays. This approach never works in the long term, primarily because lower prices cannot compensate for disadvantages that will ultimately prevent a company from holding any share gains for long in their repeated game.
Managing imbalances in the market
The riskiest behavior for any player in the Power Game is to act as if they have no agency. Getting a fair share of value depends on company’s individual choices, which makes understanding and using agency immensely important. To do this, Power Game players succeed when they:
In the next newsletter, we will take a closer look at the Custom Game.
Our book Game Changer will hit the bookshelves next month. If you haven’t pre-ordered your copy yet, you can order it HERE .
Pricing Strategy | Price Optimization | Revenue Enablement | Change Management | Business Process Improvement
1 年Impressive concepts! Enjoyed meeting you in LA and looking forward to seeing you in ATL.
Ordered on Amazon AU! Can’t wait to receive it in Nov ??