Winning Deals When You Have Less Power
Akin Monehin
Energy Leader I Entrepreneur I Columnist I Speaker I Shell's Deepwater Business Transformation Manager
Ever faced a deal where you had zero leverage?
With investors, big clients, major suppliers; do they really hold all the cards?
Negotiating from a weak position is a reality for many business leaders & entrepreneurs, but power in negotiations isn’t about size. It is about strategy.
Harvard Business School research shows that negotiators who focus on strategy (preparation and framing) can outperform those with more leverage.
Here are 3 strategies to flip the power dynamic—even when you seem outmatched.
1. The Anchor Effect: Control the First Number
A famous study by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman on anchoring bias found that the first number mentioned in a negotiation heavily influences the final outcome...regardless of actual value.
Real World Example:
When TESLA Tesla was still a struggling startup, Elon Musk anchored the company’s valuation at $1 billion when negotiating funding rounds, even before revenue justified it. Investors subconsciously adjusted expectations upward, giving Tesla stronger leverage.
But anchoring isn’t just about setting a high number. It is about sustaining the illusion. Musk reinforced the valuation by:
? Projecting confidence in Tesla’s long-term vision despite weak financials
? Using media to shape investor perception through bold future projections
? Locking in key stakeholders who validated the valuation publicly
Key Takeaway: Your first number shapes perception therefore position your value strategically.
How to Use This:
Even if you have less power, be the first to set a reference point. Whether it’s price, terms, or expectations, anchoring shifts the negotiation in your favor.
2. The MESO Strategy: Offer Multiple Equivalent Options
A study by Medvec & Galinsky of Northwestern University found that negotiators who present three different deal options (instead of just one) increase their chances of closing a deal by up to 78%. That is called Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers (MESO)
Real World Example:
Netflix offers subscription plans that reflect this strategy. Basic, Standard & Premium, catering for viewers need and budget tolerance. Nestle offers Nescafe, Nescafe Gold & Starbucks by Nespresso.
By addressing preferences, financial consideration, budget constraints, level of authority etc, you make it easier to strike a deal.
But MESO isn’t just about offering choices. It is about structuring them so that every option benefits you.
Another great example is WhatsApp 's $19 billion sale to Meta /Facebook. With just 55 employees, WhatsApp lacked the size and power to dictate terms. Instead, they:
? Positioned different acquisition scenarios (equity-heavy vs. cash-heavy)
? Implied that Google and other buyers were also interested
? Crafted a deal where WhatsApp’s independence was guaranteed
Key Takeaway: Options create the illusion of control—even when you’re driving the deal.
How to Use This:
If you’re at a disadvantage (or want your customer's money), never present just one proposal. Give multiple, well-structured options that make it easier for the other party to say yes.
3. The Illusion of Alternatives: Create Scarcity
At first glance, this might seem like the opposite of MESO.
It’s not.
MESO is designed to make saying yes easier. Scarcity is designed to force a decision when the options are there but the person hesitates.
Prof. Robert Cialdini , a leading expert on influence and persuasion, explains in his book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion that "opportunities seem more valuable to us when they are less available."
Real World Example:
Despite the fact that I have worked in the aviation industry & understand how it works, every time I see "3 seats left" on a flight I am booking online, I feel the pressure to make a decision.
This same principle works in business negotiations. Some use it to get a partner to commit to marriage.
Scarcity also played a key role in Netflix’s early licensing deals with major studios. When negotiating with Hollywood giants, Netflix had little power; so they created the illusion that other content distributors were already on board. This forced studios to act quickly before competitors could secure better terms.
Key Takeaway: People hesitate when they feel they have time. But urgency forces decisions.
How to Use This:
1. Step 1: Use MESO to present multiple deal structures.
2. Step 2: If they stall, introduce scarcity; imply other offers are on the table or set a time limit.
Final Takeaways For Business Leaders
1. Anchor Early; Set the first reference point to frame the negotiation.
2. Use MESO First; Offer multiple deal structures to make saying yes easier.
3. Apply Scarcity If Needed; If they hesitate, create urgency by implying alternatives.
Leverage isn’t given. It’s created.
Whether in boardrooms or billion-dollar acquisitions, in international politics or in the farmers' market, the highest-stakes negotiations often come down to one thing. Leverage.
Negotiation isn’t always fair—sometimes, power is just an illusion.
Have you ever flipped the script in a deal where you had no leverage? Is there a point I missed? What would you do if you were Mr. Zelenskyy?
Let's learn from each other.
Energy transition: Measurement of hydrocarbon | Gas chromatograph | Gas validation| Autocad designs| Alderley metering Certified | Instrumentation controls.
1 天前It is really a tough one for zelensky. He is in a big dilemma where, whether to go forward or backward comes with a huge cost. I think for me, the lesson learnt here is, before you accept to go in for a war, think critically of the future consequences before ventenring.
*Branding *Print Production *Book Publishing *Visual Arts *Social Entrepreneur
1 天前Akin Monehin It's always a delight reading your posts. It always felt like one is in a business school. This post is like I am in a school of life. I have painstakingly read all comments and replies. Extremely insightful. Awesome lessons. I have taken vital lessons that has definitely changed my perspective about Negotiation... Composure. Composure. Composure. Speaking in your native language was something I would never have seen as a strength in any diplomatic negotiations. I can't agree more. Awesome lessons.
Retail Veteran
1 天前Understanding and analyzing the key players in this conflict is crucial. One possible strategy for UA is to completely alter the situation. With their vast reserves of precious metals, worth trillions, there must be a strategic advantage they can leverage. Their main problem is having the wrong people in the wrong places, doing wrong moves.
Research scientist. Fitness enthusiast. Budding entrepreneur.
2 天前One man thought there was free lunch, one man went into the lion’s den without realizing it, one man should have made certain demands before accepting the meeting like closed door meetings, opting to speak in his native language to better communicate his ideas through an interpreter. Basically, one man came unprepared to a war room, because he was used to the former people he was dealing with just giving him free lunch with no questions asked.. There came a Pharoh who did not know Joseph… ????♂?????♂?
Management || Corrosion || Inspection || Asset Integrity || Technology
2 天前If I were to advise Zelensky, I will tell him to accept the card Putin has been using all along. Agree not to join NATO and let's see if Putin has any other reason to continue the war. But the problem is, if he agrees, it means the entire war was for nothing and apart from his pride not allowing him to accept defeat on the global stage, he risks his Countrymen removing him from power because it means he took them to war and still ended up where he could have ended up just 1 week into the invasion. That said, I think negotiating directly is his best bet and accepting the principal terms which Putin has insisted was the reason for the invasion is the best way to turn the table upside down - Every party that comes to help in the negotiation will want something for themselves whether it's Europe or US. The entire country is in enough debt for him to stop walking in this path that leads to an obvious destruction.