And the winner is ..... it doesn't really matter.

And the winner is ..... it doesn't really matter.

I am seeing more and more surveys, headlines and posts about charity employer league tables and awards and its starting to bother me.

One thing I have always thought differentiates the charity sector from the commercial sector is that we leverage the collaborative advantage rather than the competitive advantage. It's what makes truly collaborative charities so great, especially when they are operating in the same solution space.

So, when I see league tables that (intentionally or unintentionally) pitch charities against each other I feel uncomfortable. This is especially true in the people and workforce space. I have seen first-hand how flawed and misleading these reports can be. I know of at least 2 charity leaders who 'suggested' that all their staff voted their charity as the best place to work so that they could win the accolade - and they won lovely shiny awards as a result.

But there are other problems too:

·????? The pool of charities considered hardly ever includes small, grass roots organisations which can often be the most fulfilling places to work.

·????? I'm never sure whether the voices of volunteers are considered (just because they don't get paid doesn't mean that they don't work for their charity).

·????? If reports are compiled during a particularly difficult time (restructures and redundancies), the responses will be a snapshot in time and not an accurate reflection of the more typical, steady state.

·????? Telling charity employees that their employer is the best is, of course wonderful. But consider the impact on the employees who appear at the bottom of the list, or not on the list at all.?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for celebrating success and shining a light on happy employees at high-performing charities. But can we please congratulate responsibly and get rid of the flawed league tables and divisive competitions about which charities are the best employers, and which charities are (by default) not.

So, if you find yourself tempted by the click bait headlines to see if your charity has made the list please think again. The more we click and amplify this practice the more it will continue. Recruiting, keeping and supporting charity sector workers is challenging. Let’s not make it any harder than it needs to be. Lets work together for all employees and volunteers in this sector rather than trying to beat our competitors into first place.

After almost 35 years in the charity sector, I have learned this. All my charity employers have had strengths and challenges. Some I would work with again, others I wouldn’t. But my reasons are varied, complex and dynamic, and are just as much about me as about my employers. I count myself lucky to have built a career in this wonderful sector, and no matter which charities I have worked for I am grateful for the opportunity. I won't be rating them on a league table.


Helen Rees

EA to CEO & Board at parkrun | Award-Winning Executive Assistant | Strategic PA Network Committee Member | Co-Coordinator, PACE Network (UK charity EAs) | Non-Profit | Charity Trustee | Singer | Choir Leader

3 个月

Really interesting piece Leesa Harwood FRSA. I think - as with so many things - it all comes down to the specifics. The charity sector is SO vastly wide-ranging (from the tiniest local charities to the huge almost corporate-esque global, internationally recognised charities that barely look or function like charities any more) which makes it almost impossible to make fair comparisons. And so often these awards or ranking tables can be like comparing apples and oranges, and effectively meaningless without context. Where I do think there might be some merit, is in very specific measures - such as in terms of diversity, or sustainability, or culture - but where the measuring is done with as broad a mix of stakeholders as possible (involving volunteers, trustees, beneficiaries, etc) to get a true picture. The opportunity for a charity (just like any other business) to gain recognition & awareness outside of its own realm (whether that's in healthcare, conservation, research, education or wellbeing, for example - there are countless others) is important and can help attract & retain quality employees. But it's nuanced, and complex - and perhaps a lot of awards programmes out there don't match that nuance or complexity, just yet.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Leesa Harwood FRSA的更多文章

  • Life Begins at Whatever Age You Decide

    Life Begins at Whatever Age You Decide

    I've been reflecting lately on my age. I'm 56.

    13 条评论
  • Who's recruiting who in a candidate's market?

    Who's recruiting who in a candidate's market?

    I have lost count of the number of recruitment processes I have been involved in during my 30+ year career in the…

    1 条评论
  • Warning: Fundraising is not a bolt on

    Warning: Fundraising is not a bolt on

    I've been spooked lately by the number of times fundraising has been bolted on to other, non-fundraising roles in…

    5 条评论
  • Assurance vs Reassurance

    Assurance vs Reassurance

    I have been a member of many Boards (as a non-exec and exec contributor) and the dynamic between reassurance and…

    2 条评论
  • In Praise of Managers.

    In Praise of Managers.

    Every time I scroll through LinkedIn I see posts about leadership. When e-mails drop into my in-box they offer…

    2 条评论
  • Giving Up the Deadly White

    Giving Up the Deadly White

    When my dad stopped smoking in the 1960s he became a bit of a zealot, preaching the benefits of giving up cigarettes to…

    5 条评论
  • No Thank-you to Threads!

    No Thank-you to Threads!

    Almost everywhere I turn, my contacts and colleagues are talking about shifting away from Twitter and onto Meta’s new…

    2 条评论
  • Little Habits - Big Change.

    Little Habits - Big Change.

    I’ve given up alcohol. And Twitter.

    5 条评论
  • A lesson in budgeting - from my gran.

    A lesson in budgeting - from my gran.

    My Grandma lived within her means. She had a little notebook.

    14 条评论
  • Analog leaders in a digital world. Evolve or go.

    Analog leaders in a digital world. Evolve or go.

    Age does not equal wisdom. Recently, during a reverse mentoring session, a 27-year-old, immensely capable and very…

    13 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了