Why Your Theory of Change is on Life Support (And How to Resusitate It)
Ann-Murray Brown ????????
Facilitator | Founder, Monitoring & Evaluation Academy | Champion for Gender & Inclusion | Follow me for quality content
Ever wondered why your Theory of Change (TOC) ends up gathering dust on a forgotten shelf? You’re not alone. Here are my reasons why so many TOCs are on life support. However, for each ailment there is a remedy, and with a bit of care, your TOC can be resuscitated ;-)
1. No Stakeholder Buy-In
The Ailment. You crafted a brilliant TOC, but forgot to invite the key players. Now, it’s a lonely document with no one to champion its cause.
The Remedy. Stakeholder engagement isn’t just a nice-to-have; it’s essential. Start with a stakeholder analysis to map who the actors are, their level of interest and level of influence. This will guide you on whose input to get on the TOC and who can derail it. Furthermore, when people see their input reflected, they’re more likely to support and engage with the TOC.
2. Focus on the Visual (The Product) Instead of the Process
The Ailment.Your TOC looks like a piece of modern art, but what does it actually do? You focused on making it pretty, not practical.
The Remedy. Remember, a TOC is a tool, not a decoration. Invest time in the process— the stakeholder consultations to map out realistic pathways, validating assumptions, and ensuring it’s grounded in evidence (and reality). The visuals should support the process, not overshadow it.
3. Unvalidated Assumptions
The Ailment: You assumed that "if you build it, they will come," but they didn’t. Unvalidated assumptions are the ghosts that haunt your TOC.
The Remedy: Put your assumptions to the test. Use pilot studies, gather data, and engage with stakeholders to ensure your assumptions hold water. A little skepticism goes a long way in validating your theory.
4. No Revisiting or Updates
The Ailment: Your TOC was relevant when you wrote it... five years ago. Now, it’s outdated and irrelevant.
The Remedy: A TOC should be a living document. Schedule regular reviews and updates. Reflect on what’s working, what’s not, and adjust accordingly. An updated TOC is a useful TOC.
5. Overly Complex and Jargon-Heavy
The Ailment: Your TOC reads like a doctoral thesis on quantum physics—dense, confusing, and impenetrable.
领英推荐
The Remedy. Simplicity is key. Use clear, straightforward language and avoid jargon. Make it accessible to all stakeholders, not just the PhDs in the room. If it’s easy to understand, it’s easy to implement.
6. Lack of Clear Indicators and Metrics
The Ailment: Your TOC is all vision and no metrics. Without clear indicators, you’re flying blind.
The Remedy: Define specific, measurable indicators from the start. These metrics will help you track progress and make necessary adjustments. Clear indicators turn a vague plan into a tangible roadmap.
7. Ignoring Context and Culture
The Ailment: You copied a TOC from a different context and hoped it would fit. Spoiler: it didn’t.
The Remedy: Tailor your TOC to the specific context and culture of your project. Engage local stakeholders, understand the environment, and adapt your TOC to fit the unique circumstances. A contextualised TOC is a relevant TOC.
Conclusion
Don’t let your Theory of Change become another tombstone in the graveyard of forgotten plans. Engage stakeholders, validate assumptions, keep it simple, and update regularly. By avoiding these common pitfalls and applying these remedies, your TOC can be a living, breathing document that drives real, meaningful change.
Join the webinar on Theories of Change (TOCs) to learn more.
Two spots left!! Secure yours before it's too late! ????
?? Register here: https://lnkd.in/g5Eq4MpS ??
Human Being - Opinions expressed on LinkedIn are my own.
5 个月Seems a symptom of an entire sector on life support:)
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Lead, USAID funded Resilience Food Security Activities (RFSA)/SPIR Program
6 个月Great summary. Thank you for presenting it in a simple way. As you said TOC development and revision should involve stakeholders, and it has to be live document and should be used for planning, monitoring, evaluation and learning as well. Many of us get confused on the difference between logframe and ToC. But one thing that makes ToC different from logframe and results framework is that, it is more of non linear and should reflect complexity as development intervention is complex (non-linear). Each results in the logframe or results framework has indicators that will be measured/tracked regularly while we may not necessarily set indicators for each and every pathways in the ToC as some of them requires a one time assessments or researches or periodic review to fill the evidence gaps while we can set indicators for other pathways and measure it regularly.
MA Monitoring and Evaluation, MEAL Specialist, Disability Advocate.
6 个月Keep up the fire burning
Procesoperator bij Olie terminal
6 个月Worth attending.
A Thought Leader in Evaluations│+16 Years of International Level Experience in Designing, Managing, Conducting & Commissioning Utilization-Focused Evaluations │Impact Evaluations│OutcomeHarvesting │Committed 2 Excellence
6 个月I would add yet another reason: Project/Programme Managers hink that once the ToC is developed, it will work by itself. Oneday a miracle will happen and they will reach the ultimate outcomes envisaged in the ToC. Foremost important is to pursue ToC by them by linking it with their implemntation plan!!