Why you can only eat that sandwich once…

Why you can only eat that sandwich once…

When I met my wife, she wanted to open a restaurant.

Great, I thought — I love eating…

I mean, everyone does. Restaurants are right there will healthcare and transportation. People will always continue to get ill, fly/drive, and, yes, eat food.

We had money to invest, but I did not know anything about restaurants. It was time for some learning. I took on a couple of entry-level evening jobs at two restaurants. Got fired from one on my 3rd day, but kept the other one.

Two months later, I asked my wife what kind of a restaurant she wanted to build? One for 10-20 seats with a special that changes every day/week, or one for 50-100+ seats that can potentially grow into a franchise and prepares mostly the same food. She said she wanted to do the former, and?we abandoned the idea because I wasn’t ready to lose $$.

If you know anything about restaurants, you already know where this is going. Restaurants are low margin businesses. Boutique concepts work out very rarely. It is a lot of work with giant real estate bills and major staffing headaches.

A data company is a lot like a restaurant business.

A data company is a lot like a restaurant business. You really need to decide what you’re trying to create:

(1) A boutique that creates a daily special for a small select group of enterprise patrons…

(2) Or a low margin solution that is designed to work at scale…

A lot of data founders deceive themselves thinking that they can do (1) and grow into (2). And maybe even have both high margins as well as scale. They imagine companies such as Tableau (or more specifically, it is 2010 version before all competition). They dream about Teslas. And basically equate Data Technologies to everything else we know to work in the tech world: start with expensive non-scalable solutions, and transition to scale over time.

But there is a problem. Data business is a lot more like a restaurant business, than a pure software business.

And while you can start with a non-scalable solution, there is a high chance you will end up with one

There is a unit of utility there. In restaurants it is food (meat in a burger, cheese in a pizza). In data companies the utility unit is a record of a transaction or some user activity.?

Yes, that burger can end up costing $2, $10, or even $50. But you can never sell a $50 burger at a restaurant that also sells them for $2 . The $50 burger can never be sold at scale.

If you’re building a Dashboarding, ETL, or Data Cataloging solution, don’t make a mistake thinking you can sell $50 burgers to millions of people. Figure out what you’re doing first: a $10 dev subscription at scale or a >$50K subscription for enterprise customers.

A burger is still just a piece of meat squeezed between two buns - no matter how many times you look at it. Same goes for that webpage event you captured in your data pipeline.

???About the Author?

In my former life I was a Data Scientist. I studied Computer Science and Economics for undergrad and then Statistics in graduate school, eventually ending up at MiT, and, among other places,?Looker, a business intelligence company, which Google acquired for its Google Cloud.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

SG Mir的更多文章

  • Developing AI Applications

    Developing AI Applications

    Taking a closer look at AI feature development lifecycle Airtable Formula Suggest Those of us who grew up learning…

  • Omni Analytics

    Omni Analytics

    Since before it became the 4th largest acquisition in Google’s history, Looker had a target on its back as every other…

    1 条评论
  • Applying LLMs to Data Analytics

    Applying LLMs to Data Analytics

    One of the areas in Data I am most passionate about is ANALYTICS AS CODE. I am bullish about this because I believe…

    5 条评论
  • New Year's Resolutions

    New Year's Resolutions

    As we embark on the New Year, I find there is too much happening globally to talk about my private resolutions…

    3 条评论
  • How Databricks won the battle, for now - Conference Recap - Part I

    How Databricks won the battle, for now - Conference Recap - Part I

    The battle between Product led Growth and Sales (SLG) “Databricks is a $38 billion dollar mistake” wrote Benn Stancil…

    2 条评论
  • Plug & Play: Speaking on Generative AI

    Plug & Play: Speaking on Generative AI

    Talking Privacy, Data Ownership, Biases, and Worker Employment A common theme in many conversations at most conferences…

  • Chess as a barometer for AI

    Chess as a barometer for AI

    For over a century, the game of chess was considered the ultimate benchmark for measuring intelligence. The belief was…

  • Paul Graham has 49.3 times more "AI tokens", but does that actually mean what we think it does?

    Paul Graham has 49.3 times more "AI tokens", but does that actually mean what we think it does?

    1. The challenge of AI understanding Understanding language remains one of the most complex challenges in artificial…

  • Generative AI

    Generative AI

    Hello there, Today, we'll explore several pivotal aspects of generative AI. Let’s dive right in… AI Infrastructure:…

    1 条评论
  • ChatGPT, Emotional AI, and the Future of Communication

    ChatGPT, Emotional AI, and the Future of Communication

    Emotional AI is a broad range of technologies aimed at automating objective measurement of opinions, feelings, and…