Why we oppose Brexit
Karl Davis
Managing Director | Offshore Wind Specialist | Team Builder | Chartered Engineer | Problem Solver | Chocolate lover
Like most businesses, we typically shy away from political commentary, as it’s very easy for it to become commercially damaging. But with regard to Brexit, we’ve decided to take a stand. We strongly disagree with the actions of our Government and idly standing by isn’t something we can do in good conscience.
Commercial Implications
A good portion of our work comes from EU based companies. Some of our Clients have raised concerns about doing business with UK based companies after Brexit. To mitigate these risks, we’ve looked closely into setting up an EU based company to ensure our Clients can continue to work with us – so far we haven’t pulled the trigger on this, as we remain hopeful that we won’t be forced into it, but if our Clients prefer to deal with an EU based company, we wouldn’t hesitate to swiftly make this happen. And we’re not alone, a recent survey of the UK Institute of Directors found almost one third of UK firms are looking at relocating their head office overseas. I’m not an economist, but this would almost certainly have a huge negative impact on the UK economy and remove the hub of many businesses from the UK.
Security
To quote Edwin Starr, “War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing…”
Strong trading partners don’t end up in armed conflict. Since the establishment of the EU, the importance of such close economic ties between members has prevented any internal conflicts. I think it’s fair to infer that withdrawing from the EU increases the likelihood of the UK being engaged in potentially avoidable conflicts by reducing the economic deterrent that has existed for so long. I can see no justification for taking this kind of risk.
Legitimacy of the referendum
A referendum should be a demonstration of positive democracy in action. However, a referendum only works if the voting population is properly informed. It is clear that the voting population were misled on what the implications and complications of Brexit would be, I feel confident in stating this, as almost 3 years later, it is still unclear what Brexit will mean – there was certainly no consideration of a ‘hard brexit’, ‘soft brexit’ or ‘no-deal brexit’ prior to the referendum. From this perspective, it really does seem the original Brexit referendum was a negligent act, asking people to vote on something with no clear guidance on the outcome of it, isn’t a reasonable thing to do.
Where is the upside?
Lastly, where are the benefits to the people of the UK? So far the only groups I can see benefiting are the legal teams trying to negotiate the Brexit deal, and the management consultants advising businesses how to mitigate the risks of Brexit. For the vast majority of UK citizens it appears they will not be better off. Many imported goods and services are likely to be more expensive due to additional duties and taxes, and UK exporters will likely face similar barriers selling into the EU. The key benefits being purported by those who wished to leave are the monetary costs of EU membership and control of borders/immigration. At this stage it seems almost certain that the economic damage Brexit will do (and has done so far) to the UK will far outweigh the costs of membership. As for controls on immigration, I can understand that people might like to limit immigration, but the reality is immigration has a significant net benefit to the UK. For example, the majority of the hospitality industry is staffed by EU immigrants, doing jobs that few UK citizens choose to do. Similarly, in the UK’s beloved NHS, 10% of hospital Doctors are from other EU countries. The UK needs these people.
In our view, the UK has a lot to lose, and very little to gain from Brexit, so we’re hoping some UK politicians see sense and call a halt to the whole debacle.
The views expressed in this article are those of Empire Engineering
???? ?? kabarto
5 年In 3/8/2014 at 2:00 a. M we attact by Isis groups in shingal city they killed men end women and children they took girls that’s aterrib night every one screaming each one think about himself and how I rescue my self they are far of humanity dead body in everywhere blood at 10 A. M we could to escape through desert we went to asmall village says Qabusy we stayed there aweek with terrib and we didnot knew any moment they will find us aftere that we could escape to Musel city then to kurdistan with 5000$ we all our wealth now we live in camp in duhok city that’s very defficult we can not come back becouse of shia force group becouse we are kurdish...............................................
Chairman, Project Finance Exchange (PFX) | Google: 'PFX Projects'
5 年Excellent wordsmithing, Karl, but yet another exercise in misinformation from the 'brainwashed generation'.? The UK has traded, worldwide, for hundreds of years.? When we joined the EU, it was a 'Common Market' with all those obvious benefits and why we voted to join? But no-one told us it was going to be a political construct, with a remote and unelected bureaucracy progressively depleting our control over our own affairs.? Like the vast majority of those who voted to leave, I didn't need a campaign to persuade me.? I was not misinformed.? I based my judgement on experience and the wisdom that comes with age.? We are at the hub of a global organisation representing a third of the world's population and half its natural resources, The Commonwealth.? An organisation that believes in free trade.? We should never have turned our back on our old friends, each of which is standing by to sign free trade deals with us.? As for your concerns, trade will continue with our friends in Europe, but we will also be able to trade with the rest of the world on our own terms.? Finally, you blame the politicians for letting all this happen.? It is we, the British electorate, who voted to leave the EU.? As it's now become evident, wholly against the instincts of the those in Westminster (who have become a national embarassment).? It is their job to do as they're instructed - by us.? To suggest otherwise is not to understand the fundamental meaning of democracy.
Tenacity, Passion, Grit and Flexibility for Knowledge Based Supremacy in Aerospace Management
5 年Very good writing that even if unwillingly, but emphasizes a very important aspect of social processes: manipulation through misinformation. We have a tendency to simplify complexity. "Complexity is boring" say those uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, lazy to make the hard work of learning about complexity. As the Brexit exercise proves it is very easy to be AGAINST. It is very easy to CRITICIZE the weaknesses of a complex system. It is very easy to DESTROY what others have built with hard work. It is difficult to build on complexity, where every step has to be carefully considered, analyzed, based on educated and informed decision. It is easier to deconstruct than to construct. BREXIT IS A DECONSTRUCTIVE PROPOSITION. Long live ignorance!
Meeting people where they are
5 年I respect you views on Brexit but I don't agree with them. There has been a struggle for control of Europe for 700 years plus and whilst the EU is a information control exercise rather than a war it is none the less a fight for control. It is not UK nationalism it is who controls, what do they control and am I happy with that? The number of meetings where British Prime Ministers were clearly "Billy no mates" was significant. We have been pumping money into an organisation that wants our money but not our input unless we support wholeheartedly their project. Business entities come and they go. Good fortune to you if you choose to go.
Chartered Mechanical Engineer with experience in wave and wind energy, aircraft and ship propulsion, and nuclear design.
5 年Really well written.? I was writing a similar article at the time I saw yours.? I took a couple of sentences off you, hope you dont mind!