Why we need to explain Just-in-time now!

Why we need to explain Just-in-time now!

Folk are ill and need support – but we can’t get close to them. Caregivers are on the frontlines and need equipment to work – but we can’t get out of our homes. Shop and logistics workers are keeping us afloat – but we don’t know what we can do to help them. What can we do, confined as we are? We can grieve and think and discuss. I try not to panic more than twice a day – thinking that we’re all doomed and society as we know it is about to fail on a massive scale – and then return to think this crisis through in terms of horizon zero (today, supporting the ill and healthcare staff), horizon one (the next weeks in lockdown, supporting supply chain workers), horizon two (what happens at the end of quarantine?) and three (who will we be when we come out of this). The least we can do for people on the frontline we can’t help directly is think straight – they’re going to need us to create the right support structures and avoid devastating mistakes.

 I’m told that what got us here is just-in-time supply chains: if only we’d had more inventories of masks, chemicals, etc. we would have been better off. Think it through. How can we keep inventories of everything without knowing what we need in advance. After the H1N1 epidemic, we were left with huge inventories of unused masks, which then went out of date or disappeared in the system – we’re uncovering some now. The essence of Just-in-time is discovering where the critical strain is and protecting key resources. Just-in-time leads to keeping access to key equipment capability, not inventories. We don’t have enough masks because we don’t know how to make masks anymore. We don’t have enough tests because the chemicals needed come from… China.

Let’s look at masks – small, simple things in themselves, nothing like respirators, but absolutely necessary for safe care (and feeling safer in general). First, we’re discovering forgotten inventories everywhere (just ask administrations or the military)… both usable and out of date masks. Second, having found them, no one knows where to send them in priority, so more sitting around while smart people make intelligent triage decisions. Thirdly, the reason we’re lacking so much vital material is that it’s all being procured from China – which, as you can imagine, is largely holding to its own produce right now. Just-in-time thinking has you locate critical components in a 100 miles radius, not halfway around the world.

 Now, I worry. The next step I see coming, particularly in large companies, is the brass realizing that it’s can’t be good to stop production sites for lack of material or willing workers. So they’ll ask Purchasing to do something about it and Purchasing will do what it does – which is try to order as much as can be found on the market at the best price. Thus making the supply problem worse by fueling the Forrester bullwhip effect.

 Let’s take a deep breath and a step back.

The point of lockdown is “flattening the curve.”

Aucun texte alternatif pour cette image

Flattening the curve doesn’t mean less contagion – it means slower contagion. The theory is that we can thus reduce the pressure on Emergency Rooms. That works for horizon 1 – this week and next week, hence the quarantine. This is great because better care will mean, hopefully, fewer victims. But if we follow this thinking through it also means that we’re pushing forward in time the infection curve. It will last longer. We need to look at horizon 2.

 The problem we’re facing goes well beyond conjuring hoards of masks, sanitizing gel, chemicals for test kits, respirators, etc., and routing them to where they’re the most needed. We need to see that we’re going to need a steady flow of these products for the foreseeable future. We need to structure those supply chains. We need the production capability – and then capacity.

 The best way to do so is Just-in-time. All the horror stories of people hoarding stuff, then not knowing what to do with it while others desperately need it but go without is a feature of human behavior. No surprise there. We have experience from previous crises and battlefields all over the world. Reconstituting inventories leads to only one thing: SNAFU – situation normal, all fouled up. Shipping the wrong stuff at the wrong time to the wrong people.

 A Just-in-time pull system is about structuring the logistics of the material – the route – and then frequent delivery where and when it’s needed. It means having production facilities closer to point-of-use. It means flexible equipment that can adapt to real demand.

 I can understand a ten year-old blaming Just-in-time for our predicament. After all, it is true that if we had more inventories of, well, just about everything, we wouldn’t run out of material so fast. But that’s also exactly the point – this is new and unprecedented. We don’t know what we’re going to need, in what quantities, where and when. Having lots of the wrong stuff at the wrong location doesn’t help much. The countries best holding the current pandemic, like South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Singapore are those 1/ favorable and experienced with Just-in-time, not against it and 2/ with existing practice of wearing masks when ill to protect one’s neighbors.

 I can’t begin to envision what horizon 3 will be like, after we cope and recover. But what is very clear is that we’ll be living with episodic returns of the coronavirus, and will have to learn to deal with it as Asian countries have done with SARS – Taiwan, China and South Korea were badly hit by COVID19, but also obviously much better prepared. This starts with understanding the logistics of the problems, rather than just locking up everyone in their own house and hope things will magically get better. They won’t.

 I had the good fortune and privilege of learning with Chick Perrow, the author of normal accidents, who recently passed away. In tightly coupled systems, accidents will happen. When three random failures converge, humans lose track of the system and make the wrong call. Rules and systems made to automate and normalize the daily operation of complex systems make them rigid and inflexible and therefore make it even harder to correct quickly and flexibly. Supply chains are coupled complex systems, and accidents cascade then catastrophe – this is what we will be experiencing in the coming weeks.

 The time for Just-in-time is now. We need to educate more. We need to explain to politicians and business leaders that supply chain are living, complex creatures that need care and forethought. We need to teach more broadly the principles of just-in-time, of the quick response systems that go with it and the attitude of respect-for-people that sustains it all.

I don’t know how we get from here to there. Any history of medical discoveries shows that society has a poor record of adopting quickly new solutions, but that it does so in the end. Just-in-time is a proven, time-tested logistical system that performs better than anything else both in everyday conditions and in crisis times, such as factory fires, tsunamis or inundations. How long it takes us to understand and adopt Just-in-time logic to respond faster to epidemics and avoid ruinous lockdowns – is up to us.

Sid Joynson

Helper, Sid Joynson Partnership

4 年

We have been here before. We are at war with the Coronavirus. If ventilators are one of the main weapons in this battle, we need to apply mass production methods to a standardised simplified design. The mass production system won the production battle of the Second World War. The design must be driven by customer needs, not wants. The goal is to produce the maximum quantity in the shortest time. We need to use it again. Like the last war our future could depend upon it, & it does. We need a team of mature production engineers who understand the methodologies of mass production. Between the existing manufactures they have all the designs, moulds & tooling to produce their present ranges. That is the starting point. Our goal is to push the maximum number of the required quality products through to the battlefront in the shortest time. We must also create a Skunk Works; a co-located team of users, designers, developers to create, develop & set up a production capability for the products required. ?We must replicate the effort of American industry after their entry into the war. In comparison the ventilator is a toy. Here we are all on the spacecraft called Earth, & as they did on Apollo 13, we must find a solution to our challenges, NOW! In Singapore they have setup sixty production lines for face masks. We just need leaders who have the vision, understanding and determination to make this happen. When we have won the war we can then scale back.?

Michel Megas

?? Chef de Projet | Consultant Sénior IT RETAIL AMOA ?? Supply Chain | Stratégie | Métiers | Process | Technologie | Digital.?? Je vous aide à concrétiser vos projets de transformation pour regagner le c?ur du client !

4 年

Thanks Michael, formostly for reminding us - the confined folk - that in those harsh times "...The least we can do for people on the frontline we can’t help directly is think straight..." ; and here lean thinking helps again as you so brilliantly put it to us.

回复
Dirk Fischer

Chief Operating Officer and Interim CEO at Huf Group | Transforming organizations towards holistic business excellence, based on the principles of the Toyota Way, Theory of Constraints and other effective approaches.

4 年

See https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/is-it-time-to-rethink-globalized-supply-chains/ "Consider regionalization. The U.S.-China trade war has already put regionalization of manufacturing back on the table. While production moves have begun in many cases, localizing the supplier base is also worth considering. When Toyota pioneered lean production in Japan back in the 1970s, its suppliers facilitated this by being colocated nearby. Chinese manufacturers did the same as they evolved their operations during the 1990s and early 2000s. Yet many companies, lulled by efficient and relatively inexpensive logistics and transport, have been applying lean and just-in-time production methods that span global networks. The current crisis exposes the vulnerability of this approach. Notably, Toyota continues to practice localization to a greater extent than many of its competitors. In fact, for its Georgetown, Kentucky, factory, more than 350 suppliers are located in the United States, and more than 100 inside the state of Kentucky."

回复
Dr. Shakhi Mazumder

Senior Packaging Development Technologist at Lindt & Sprungli UK

4 年

Great article. Highlights well the complexity of demand, cost and accessibility.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Michael Ballé的更多文章

  • Visualizing organizational strategy

    Visualizing organizational strategy

    We all know what an organization looks like: it's a bunch of departments with a bunch of managers having lots of…

    2 条评论
  • Understanding systems still matters

    Understanding systems still matters

    When start ups grow to scale, the game is to replace manual activities with processes: your offering has found buyers…

    6 条评论
  • The Lean Game Plan

    The Lean Game Plan

    What is the lean game plan? Watching the world cup, I was wondering about how lean helps to win at the business game…

    3 条评论
  • Lean finance thinking: from ROI to ROA

    Lean finance thinking: from ROI to ROA

    “I understand your savings calculation,” says the CFO to the lean manager, “but now at year end I don’t see the…

    11 条评论
  • How to practice strategic thinking?

    How to practice strategic thinking?

    How do you practice strategic thinking? By now, we’re all starting to realize how the acceleration brought by our…

  • Value, value exploitation and learning

    Value, value exploitation and learning

    Thirty years of studying lean transformations through the implementation of lean systems – what general lessons can we…

    1 条评论
  • Culture and systems, top dogs and team leaders

    Culture and systems, top dogs and team leaders

    The best plant manager I’ve met (he inspired one of the characters in The Lean Manager) used to spend most of his time…

    8 条评论
  • Put kaizen first

    Put kaizen first

    Ever since I’ve studied lean I remember being confronted with a simple question: kaizen first, or kaizen later when all…

    2 条评论
  • How is lean so different? It seeks different kinds of solutions - or countermeasures

    How is lean so different? It seeks different kinds of solutions - or countermeasures

    To better understand the mess we’re in, we need to look at the kinds of solutions people believe in and look for in…

  • To go lean: strive!

    To go lean: strive!

    Thirty years ago, when I first studied how Toyota engineers transformed a production cell at a supplier, I didn’t…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了