Why Use a fallback or receive Function?
Direct Ether Transfers:
contractAddress.send(1 ether);
contractAddress.transfer(1 ether);
Users might not always call the deposit() function intentionally and might simply send Ether directly to the contract.
A receive function ensures the contract handles these situations gracefully.
A receive() function is slightly cheaper than calling a deposit() function because it doesn't involve function selector calculations.
--> AND VERY IMPORTANT:
External tools, services, or contracts interacting with your smart contract may send Ether directly. A receive function ensures compatibility with such interactions.
If no receive or fallback function is implemented, any direct Ether transfer will cause the transaction to revert. This might confuse users or result in failed interactions.
When You Don't Need a receive Function
Your contract is designed to accept Ether exclusively through deposit() and you enforce this rigorously.
Example:
function deposit() external payable {
require(msg.value > 0, "Must send Ether to deposit");
balances[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
Receive vs. Fallback
receive() external payable {
balances[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
fallback() external payable {
// Optional: You can handle Ether or log an event here.
}
Which to Use?
Final Takeaway
You don’t need a fallback or receive function if you only want to accept Ether explicitly via deposit().
However, having one provides better user experience, broader compatibility, and robustness in case of unexpected interactions.
Would you like to see an example without the receive function? comment "EXAMPLE" below !
En formation Expert Blockchain Developer
3 周Very clear and instructive. Thanks.