Why Ultimate Beneficial Ownership Verification is Essentials for Effective AML Compliances

The concept of Ultimate Beneficial Owner is a cornerstone of corporate law and the fight against financial crime. Understanding who truly controls a company goes beyond just knowing the names on paperwork. In a world where malicious actors weave intricate webs of ownership, structures, uncovering the UBO can be daunting risk.

The Importance of UBO Screening

For business UBO screening is not optional, it is a necessity, it allow companies to:

• Identify Beneficial Owner
• Verify Identities
• Mitigate Risk

Ultimate Beneficial Ownership and AML

UBO can present such as high level of AML risk because they may use corporate infrastructure to conceal the true nature of their business, or their identities in order to avoid the scrutiny of compliance controls.

FATF sets out AML guidance relating to Ultimate Beneficial Ownership in recommendation 24 - which requires members states to take measures to prevent the misuse of legal persons for money laundering or terrorism financing.

UBO and Shell Companies

One of the most criminal threats associate with ultimate beneficial ownership is the use of shell companies, While shell companies often established for Legitimate purpose, they are frequently use for money launder to conceal identity of their owners. Normally established without any physical premises, assets or even employees shell companies enables criminals to hide behind corporate infrastructure while they introduce illegal money into the legitimate financial system. In some foreign jurisdictions, shell companies can be set up anonymously – and then used to evade AML scrutiny.?

UBO Crackdown: Global Action on Shell Companies

Leaks like the Panama Papers exposed the dangers of shell companies. In response, a wave of UBO regulations is sweeping the globe:

• UK: The People with Significant Control (PSC) Register requires companies to disclose true owners. Plans for similar registers for land and trusts are underway.
• EU: The 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive mandates UBO registers, but implementation varies. Latvia, for example, has tightened controls.
• US: The Corporate Transparency Act requires businesses to report beneficial ownership, but its launch has been delayed.
• Singapore: Companies must maintain a Register of Registrable Controllers and report ownership information to authorities.

This global clampdown on shell companies signifies a commitment to financial transparency.

Ultimate Beneficial Ownership AML Red Flags

In order to identify potential money laundering activities, including the misuse of shell companies, organisations should be vigilant for the following UBO red flags:?

• Customers that provide insufficient or incomplete information about the beneficiaries of their transactions.?
• Companies that send wire transfers with unusual frequency or to an unusual number of beneficiaries.
• Companies that engage in transactions that seem unusual for their industrial sector.?
• Companies that engage in transactions irregularly or only sporadically.?
• Transactions in amounts that are not typical of a company’s wealth profile.
• Transactions that involve sender or beneficiary companies in off-shore locations or in high risk AML jurisdictions.?
• Payments which may not be traced to bank accounts and which are only traceable via reference to a company invoice or contract.

Using these red flags to stop criminal activity should be a priority for service providers. With that in mind, sophisticated banks and other organisations are demanding solutions which integrate machine learning and other analytic techniques to unravel and interpret the vast amounts of complex data – generated by sources all over the world – necessary to address? UBO concerns.

Thanks for being part of the newsletter!