Why structure is good and more structure may be better…

Why structure is good and more structure may be better…

‘There’s a whole lot of new ideas on org design out there - flatter, more agile, non-hierarchical, cellular, networked – how to know what might help in our reorganisation?’

You want to find an organisation design and structure that won’t just not get in the way of organisation performance but will help drive results by allowing the work, the information and the energy of people to flow. You want an organisation design that will be able to shift and re-balance itself in an agile way to respond to or anticipate changes in the market, in technology and in the industry dynamics.

This search often starts out as a turning away from ‘old’, ‘traditional’, ‘bureaucratic’, ‘hierarchical’ structures and an experimentation with agile organisation methods or flatter, self-managing, participative approaches - of which Holacracy is probably the exemplar brand.

But there is hierarchy and hierarchy. Elliot Jaques wrote the HBR article In Praise of Hierarchy years ago to lay some misconceptions and to set out the conditions under which organisation structure and hierarchy don’t just work but work well. He called his overriding approach ‘requisite organisation’ – the structure and organisation that is required for optimal functioning. Others have developed the ‘requisite organisation’ approach including Brian Dive, whose DMA (Decision Making Accountability) solution has been developed and applied in Unilever and Tesco and others (and is also applied as Space to Lead)

What might surprise you – and gives some of the solid answers to organisation design questions – is that Holacracy and DMA have a lot in common.

·      Both start with the front line – the doers – what the work is and how it is organised and build ‘structure’ or organisation from there

·      Both take the organisation’s purpose ( or mission) as the touchstone to judge the design

·      Both predict that the outcomes of autonomy, devolved decision making, empowerment, greater productivity, job satisfaction, personal development will come as by-products of getting the organisation right first

·      Both say that structure in the broadest sense, including boundaries and rules, is key to good organisation design

·      Both say that the right ‘structure’ – like Goldilocks not too little, not too much – gives the clarity, boundaries and freedom for people to give of their best

·      Both focus on role clarity first and separate the role from the person in the role

I’d summarise the starting point of both approaches as ‘get the role clear, get accountabilities and boundaries of the role clear, create roles with the authority, headroom and elbowroom to add value to others and deliver on their purposes and accountabilities.’

There is a lot more to DMA and Holacracy than this, and there are substantial differences between them but don’t let that distract from the key point we can get from both approaches: clear roles and accountabilities are at the heart of every successful organisational form. Start there and you have a solid foundation.

www.stantonmarris.com

David Ferrabee

Management Consultant: Extensive experience in change management, culture change and employee engagement in large, complex businesses. Charity board member, chair and mentor. Occasional novelist.

5 å¹´

Great point, well made John.

赞
回复
Ann Edwards LEADERSHIP WELLNESS at THE THERAPY SHED

ALCHEMY … Creating compelling futures together with me, Ann Edwards, my eclectic talents and expertise....WORK with me to learn to fully participate as a leader in this crazy & challenging world. All leaders welcome!

5 å¹´

this gives me fond memoties of our times working with the TP strategy group! Ann

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Bruce-Jones的更多文章

  • Culture in crisis 3. Black Lives Matter: transforming inclusion and diversity

    Culture in crisis 3. Black Lives Matter: transforming inclusion and diversity

    As a society and in business we have taken steps towards an intent of equal opportunity. But the Black Lives Matter…

    1 条评论
  • Culture in crisis 2. Two paths out of the crisis

    Culture in crisis 2. Two paths out of the crisis

    As organisations grapple with extraordinary conditions, many have turned to centralised decision-making, seeking…

    2 条评论
  • Culture in crisis: collaboration's missing ingredient

    Culture in crisis: collaboration's missing ingredient

    The structures of tasks, specialisation and accountability in the pre-Covid business went hand in hand with assumptions…

    2 条评论
  • Principles for principles

    Principles for principles

    What do we mean by organisation design principles? When I’m asked to help define the principles for an organisation…

    2 条评论
  • Designing an organisation that works for the people in it

    Designing an organisation that works for the people in it

    How to judge an organisation design: Part 3 “How do you think people are going to take to the new design? How can we…

    1 条评论
  • Reality testing an organisation design

    Reality testing an organisation design

    How to judge an organisation design: Part 2 “I can see what you are trying to achieve with the organisation design…

    1 条评论
  • What does organisation design set out to achieve?

    What does organisation design set out to achieve?

    How to judge an organisation design: Part 1 “Welcome to the team. I’d appreciate your views on something straight away.

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了