Why Startups Need to Embrace Disruptive Technology to Succeed
Photo credit - Neosperience

Why Startups Need to Embrace Disruptive Technology to Succeed

The biggest startup lesson I’ve learned is that you can’t succeed without embracing disruptive technology. It might seem like a buzzword, but it's true: Disruptive technology is what makes or breaks a business.

Specifically, I mean technologies that make your product obsolete overnight—and there are plenty of examples to prove this point.

Disruptive technology refers to an innovation that fundamentally changes the way a particular industry or market operates. It can create new markets, disrupt existing ones, and displace established market leaders. Disruptive technologies often start as simple, low-cost alternatives to existing technologies, but as they improve and become more widely adopted, they can have a significant impact on the industry. Examples of disruptive technologies include the personal computer, streaming services, and ride-sharing apps.

Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave

Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen is credited with coining the term "disruptive technology" and introducing it in his 1995 article "Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave," which he co-wrote with Joseph Bower. "Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave" is a seminal article published by Clayton Christensen and Joseph Bower in the Harvard Business Review in 1995. The article introduced the concept of "disruptive technology," which refers to a new technology that disrupts an existing market or creates a new one.

Christensen and Bower identified two types of technologies: sustaining and disruptive. Sustaining technologies are incremental improvements to existing technologies, while disruptive technologies are fundamentally different and can create new markets or disrupt existing ones.

The authors argued that established companies often struggle to adopt disruptive technologies because they are focused on improving their existing products or services, and are not willing to take risks on unproven technologies. In contrast, startups and new entrants are more likely to adopt disruptive technologies because they have less to lose and are more willing to take risks.

The article provided several examples of disruptive technologies, including the personal computer, mini steel mills, and discount retailers. It also discussed strategies for established companies to respond to disruptive technologies, including creating a separate division or entity to focus on the new technology, acquiring a startup that has developed the technology, or partnering with a startup to bring the technology to market.

"Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave" has become a classic in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship and has influenced many business leaders and academics.

Disruptive Technology and Startups

Disruptive technology is often viewed as a double-edged sword. While it can create enormous opportunities for those who embrace it, it can also pose significant challenges for those who are slow to adapt. Businesses and industries that fail to keep up with disruptive technology risk becoming obsolete, while those that embrace it can gain a competitive advantage and thrive in the new market landscape.

Whether a startup should focus on disruptive technology depends on several factors, including the market they are targeting, the competition, and the resources available.

On one hand, developing a disruptive technology can give a startup a significant advantage over its competitors, as it can create a new market or disrupt an existing one. It can also attract investment and media attention, which can help the startup grow and succeed.

On the other hand, developing a disruptive technology can be risky and expensive. It may require significant resources, including research and development, as well as marketing and sales efforts to educate potential customers on the benefits of the new technology. Additionally, the market may not be ready for the technology, and the startup may struggle to gain traction.

Ultimately, it is up to the startup to weigh the potential benefits and risks of developing a disruptive technology and determine if it aligns with their goals and resources. Some startups may choose to focus on incremental improvements to existing technologies or business models, while others may pursue more radical innovation.

PURABEE PURNASHA MISHRA

Innovation catalyst, Growth Sherpa, Researcher, Global awardee, Mission LiFE Ambassador

1 年

5G technology, Advanced Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Cloud services, Nanotechnology, Big Data, 3D printing, Cybersecurity, Computational chemistry, Digital finger print, Quantum computing, Hyper-personalization, chat bots and many other emerging technologies have really changed the ways of life in a good way. Its better to be ready than ignoring its presence. Leading the technology with compassion and high level of awareness is very much required rather denying it.

回复
Shilpa Bhowmick

Freelance Content Specialist @Abekus.ai @ITC Happy Tummy @Tripledart @Adapt.io @STYX Media @Grotomic

1 年

Very well spoken Dr Nikhil Agarwal. I absolutely agree with your point. Glad that you spoke about it because people fear technology especially disruptive tech, more than embracing it to their advantage. I believe this is also the time to have out-of-the-box thinking and implement it with disruptive tech.

回复
Atul Jain

Engineering Consultant, Electronics and Instrumentation and Control with Automation Upgradation and Technology Transfer

1 年

With all due respect, Out of box thinking and implementation of Idea is better option I humbly submit. Regards

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了