Why are so many editors leaving publishing?
When publishers maneuver through supply chain problems and navigate through a pandemic to keep up with the demand for books, they should be applauded.?But when they’re failing to properly care for and nurture the people who make their businesses possible, publishers need to be called out just as enthusiastically.
When I read?Molly McGhee’s impassioned post ?about leaving her job as Assistant Editor at a well known publishing house, it opened my eyes:
Molly has eight years of experience in the industry.?The fact that she was told she wouldn’t be able to elevate out of an assistant position for another five years was something she wasn’t willing (and shouldn’t have been, in my opinion) to accept.
McGhee is just one example of what is not just a trend, but a systemic issue within publishing.?Editors are overworked and underpaid.?Much of the reading they’re tasked with happens outside of working hours, including on weekends, and done without any extra pay.
Assistant editors like Molly are also often tagged with managing administrative duties, duties that are time consuming and pull them away from their reading requirements.?In Molly’s own words:
“[execs] cannot use their own databases, pull their own manuscripts, organize their own inboxes, or navigate the constant influx of new technology. As such, this often falls on junior employees, who are expected to perform both full time admin work in addition to their full time jobs.”
Editors being overworked isn’t a new phenomenon
This?1998 New York Times article ?shows that this issue has been brewing for quite some time.?With the number of titles surging through that decade, the number of publishing professionals in New York, mostly editors, were cut by 16%.
Editors were busy then and are busy now, acquiring new titles, assisting with marketing and promotion, keeping up with technology; all of this before getting down to their “primary” duty, which is to actually help authors construct their books and elevate the quality of the manuscripts before publishing.
But are editors actually even editing anymore? In?Sadie Hoagland’s piece for Publisher’s Weekly ?titled,?“The End Of Editing,”?she tells the story of publishing her first book. After receiving suggestions from a peer review, she waited to hear what changes her editor would suggest.
“I agreed to address these small issues, and I waited for the editor to whom I had originally submitted the work to give me her edits. They never came.?She told me to make the changes the reviewers had suggested, and then I was whisked right on to copy editing.?I know she cared about the book. She just wasn’t going to edit it in the way I thought she would.”
Later in the article, Hoagland quotes her agent, Madison Smartt Bell, who says that,?“Editors now can expect manuscripts submitted to them to be in an extremely finished state, perfected whether by writers teaching in the academy, or by agents drawing on their past experience as editors, or a combination of those two.”
The agent part is interesting. I can attest to how involved agents are in the editing process.?My agent has been incredibly active, offering ideas and suggesting changes to my manuscript before we send to publishers.?In fact, I’m an example of what is becoming more normal, which is I had my manuscript edited heavily before ever showing it to a publisher, so that when it was time for the publisher to edit my novel, there were no significant changes at all.
领英推荐
I didn’t know there was a time when editors from publishing houses wouldn’t expect fully polished manuscripts.?I came into this game with the expectation that as an author, I would have to do most of the work myself.?My first agent made me rework my entire manuscript, then pay to get it professionally edited before she agreed to pitch it to publishers.?I remember several times her telling me that, “It wasn’t always like this.” Her words make more sense than ever.
This is not just a US problem
A 2021 article by Clair Millar describes this exact issue in publishing in Australia. Millar opens the piece by stating,?“For many people, working in the publishing industry is all they’ve ever wanted to do.?But once they get there they face low wages, high workload and union busting — all while being told how lucky they are.”
And as I engaged with people on Twitter, it confirms the assertion that this is a systemic issue that plagues the entire publishing industry.
So what do authors do?
First thing we need to do is show some patience and empathy.
Yeah, editors are at full capacity, and with so many of them feeling like they’re forced to leave the industry, the burden on editors who have chosen to stay is even heavier. So maybe don’t be so critical if you get a rejection without any explanation.
The next thing authors should do is take more accountability.?Like it or not, this is the situation we’re in. Despite how much an editor may care about your book, they may not have the capacity or energy to give you the type of content or line edit your story needs. That means the onus is on you.?Bring them a polished manuscript.?It sucks that you might have to pay more upfront to make sure your manuscript is properly edited, but think of it as an investment.
Let me take a quick step back. In no way am I saying editors are not capable of doing their jobs. They are creative people just like us writers and they wouldn’t be in this industry if they didn’t love books and reading books, specifically. What I’m saying is that the economics of their situation, the amount of work they need to keep up with on a daily basis, is making it more difficult for them to do the thing which I’m certain they love most, and that’s editing books.
So with that in mind, we as authors need to understand the landscape. And while I agree that we should push the publishing industry to do better, the reality is what it is. And we need to deal with the current reality of the situation so we can make better decisions for ourselves and for our careers.
____________________________________________________________________
Did you enjoy this piece? I’m an author who genuinely loves studying the publishing industry, so follow and share if you’re down for the ride. I’ll keep dropping weekly insights on how publishing connects to pop culture.
While you’re here, read my new novel,?BOYS AND GIRLS SCREAMING .
Administrative Professional | Expert in Organization, Strategic Communication, & Customer Service | Empowering Organizational Success
2 年I've been following Molly's post on Twitter and seeing what other editors were saying in response. The burnout is all too real in our society in general and it's sad for publishing (and for authors who need editing services) especially when this seems to be the expectations of most employers. As a writer this is heartbreaking to see happen but maybe a necessary way to open the eyes of publishers (or employers everywhere). A new paradigm in how we 'work' is emerging and employees aren't going to sit back and take it anymore. It's a good thing but has its growing pains. I'd love to see editors get together to form their own small group of editing services (sharing their overhead costs etc) and offering affordable rates to new or emerging writers where our manuscripts can be polished before we submit to agents. This would allow editors to still be editors but outside the publishing houses, give them smaller workloads (they decide on how many clients they take on), and more writers to access editing services.
Human Rights Activist | Spring Magazine Writer | POET | Community Advocate
2 年Insightful article, Kern Carter! Thanks for studying the publishing industry. Expecting your new book to come out on the subject! I wonder if publishers could fix the problem by hiring 'tech assistants' who don't have to read all the readings, as well as hiring editorial assistants who do all the readings but don't have to do All the data entry, filing, budgeting, and tech support. Separate it into two types of jobs? Or does that make too much sense? At any rate, it's possible this suggestion might not put a damper on these wicked-class-based hierarchies in the highly competitive field of publishing. But it's worth a try to create an environment where we don't have publishing supervisors deciding who's 'ready' to move up, and who's not ready yet. Because that language simply translates into who they 'visibly' want to see permanently in burn-out types of service positions. I think we've already seen how that turns out. - LF