Why should safeguards by design be a global effort?

Why should safeguards by design be a global effort?

(Opinion article published March 2024 in 'Nuclear News' by the American Nuclear Society)

I can't think of a more exciting time to be working in nuclear, with the diversity of advanced reactor development and increasing global support for nuclear in sustainable energy planning. But we cannot lose sight of the need to plan for effective international safeguards at the same time.

Global nuclear deployment has been underpinned since 1970 by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), making it a key customer requirement for governments to demonstrate unequivocally that the technology is not being misused for weapons development.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has helped verify this commitment for more than 50 years, but it has never safeguarded many of the advanced reactors (and related fuel cycle processes) being developed today.

For that, the IAEA will need to not only adapt its current practices but also work with its Member States to develop new processes and technologies. Advanced reactors may need advanced safeguards, and these take time to develop.

Hence, "safeguards by design" (SBD): It's imperative to talk now with the nuclear design community to ensure that efficient safeguards can be implemented at advanced facilities when they are deployed, without interfering with safe, secure operation (the "3S" interfaces).

It probably seems straightforward when put this way, but historically, international safeguards has not been high on the radar of the nuclear design community. Legally speaking, it's an operator's obligation, and one that has for many years been addressed largely through known measures and processes.

In nuclear weapon countries like the United States, it's not even an operator's obligation, since the NPT doesn't require comprehensive international safeguards on these civilian nuclear programs.

So, we have a massive, expanding global market and a key customer requirement with limited visibility.

But in the end, good engineering design means knowing your customer's requirements. At the IAEA we have seen that nuclear designers tend to embrace the concept of SBD (and the greater "3S" integration of safety, security, and safeguards) as soon as they become aware of its benefit to timely deployment.

The world has handed our industry an opportunity to finally fulfill the full promise of nuclear energy. Let's do this right; let's do this together.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jeremy Whitlock, PhD, FCNS的更多文章

  • Reprocessing and non-proliferation

    Reprocessing and non-proliferation

    Since its discovery plutonium has symbolized the Faustian bargain of nuclear fission: the unshackling of energy from…

    15 条评论
  • The buzz around Canada

    The buzz around Canada

    Canada comes up a lot in nuclear conversations – always has. Half a century ago the curiosity focused on why Canada was…

    9 条评论
  • Yes, Virginia, There is Still Science

    Yes, Virginia, There is Still Science

    (with apologies to Francis P. Church, 1839-1906) DEAR INTERNET: I am eight years old.

  • Canada's Big Modular Reactor

    Canada's Big Modular Reactor

    Canada is a big country. It has big energy needs, big natural resources, big environmental challenges – and big ideas.

    25 条评论
  • Saving the world from itself

    Saving the world from itself

    It’s hard to find a shining example of successful global policy these days, with the world apparently coming apart at…

    6 条评论
  • Ten Nuclear Waste Myths

    Ten Nuclear Waste Myths

    Today many countries with nuclear power programs are developing, or plan to develop, a deep geological repository (DGR)…

    14 条评论
  • I SEE

    I SEE

    I see the rocks; they broach the landscape around me, with layered colours that tell a story of fire and cataclysm and…

    3 条评论
  • 'Oppenheimer' and the problem of ‘near zero’

    'Oppenheimer' and the problem of ‘near zero’

    Contrary to the portrayal in the film Oppenheimer (and now widespread public belief), the atomic scientists did not…

    18 条评论
  • 'Oppenheimer' and the Canadians

    'Oppenheimer' and the Canadians

    Christopher Nolan’s 2023 opus Oppenheimer sparked renewed public interest in the Manhattan Project – the US…

    12 条评论
  • 'Oppenheimer' and all those marbles

    'Oppenheimer' and all those marbles

    The 2023 film Oppenheimer includes a clever plot device where Los Alamos scientists gradually add marbles to both a…

    14 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了