Why not select members of Congress by lottery?

Why not select members of Congress by lottery?

Why Not? Is a bi-weekly newsletter from Post Opinions written by columnist Daniel Pink, who will explore bold, surprising ideas to improve our world. Click the “subscribe” button above to make sure you receive every edition of this newsletter.

By Daniel Pink, Contributing Opinion columnist

The U.S. House of Representatives is not representative at all.

Of its 435 members, 71 percent are men, 72 percent are White, one-third are lawyers, and more than half are millionaires.

Compare that with a nation in which women outnumber men, Whites constitute less than 60 percent of the population, a scant 1 in 128 American workers has a legal background, and 4 in 10 people lack the money to cover a $400 emergency expense.

A House of Representatives with the demographics of a House of Lords isn’t the only reason for legislative dysfunction and public disdain. But it doesn’t help. And legions of Why Not? readers believe they have a solution.

“Why not transform the House of Representatives by including members who are chosen by lottery . . . and drafted to serve for a defined period of time?” wonders a reader in Vero Beach, Florida.

On Election Day, we affirm with our actions an unspoken principle of governance: The fairest and most democratic way to determine who wields public power is by asking citizens to cast ballots.

But what if there’s an alternative — not autocracy or monarchy but a more radical form of democratic representation and popular sovereignty?

“Why not make serving in Congress like jury duty?” asks a reader in Salt Lake City. “If you meet the criteria, you could be selected to serve for a term, which would give a broader cross-section of people representing regular Americans.”

This is an excerpt of Daniel Pink's "Why Not?" column from Post Opinions. Read the full article for free by clicking this gift link.

Share your bold, unexpected idea for improving our country, our organizations or our lives. We read every submission and will select the most intriguing ideas to explore in future newsletters.


Check out our podcast

A little-known secret: Washington Post Opinions columnists like talking to one another. They don’t always agree, of course, but they are in almost constant conversation – testing their ideas, refining their thoughts and sometimes changing their minds.

Each week on “Impromptu,” Post columnists go beyond hot takes and have personal, candid conversations on the latest topics in news and culture that we can't stop thinking about.

Be sure to listen to the latest episodes our website, Spotify, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. On today's episode: Inside the nervy climax of the 2024 election.

Tammy Warner

Design Monkey

3 个月

Let's just burn the whole thing down and give it back to the Iroquois.

回复
Steve Selman

Independent Writing and Editing Professional

4 个月

And this coming from a publication whose director was married to Victoria Nuland. You can't make this stuff up.

回复
Oleksandr Skytchenko

Policy Design | Energy Transition Innovator | ERaaS (Energy Resilience as a Service) | Climate Diplomacy & ESG Integration | Driving Sustainable Energy Solutions

4 个月

The idea of an American Citizens Assembly based on sortition is compelling, offering more equitable, representative governance. By removing barriers like wealth and entrenched political interests, every demographic could fairly participate in the legislative process. Challenges: 1. Limited Political Experience: Randomly selected individuals may lack the expertise to navigate complex policy. ML could provide ongoing training and support, reducing inefficiencies. 2. Increased Lobbyist Influence: New representatives may be vulnerable to external pressures. AI can analyze patterns and flag conflicts of interest, minimizing undue influence. 3. Accountability and Trust: Without regular elections, accountability could suffer. ML can track decision-making, offering transparency and feedback on representative behavior. 4. Ideological Representation: Sortition may fail to ensure balanced ideological diversity. ML could factor in demographics and regional representation, promoting fairer outcomes. Integrating open-book, human-centered systems addresses these challenges, ensuring informed decisions, greater transparency, and a truly representative system. Perhaps it's time to combine tradition and technology for a stronger, fairer democracy.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

The Washington Post的更多文章